ChicksDigMe thumbnail
Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#1

I don't care what Ahijit feels about singers not participating in this contest. I only care about what the judges have to say regarding the singers participating in this contest and I strongly feel that the judging is not up to par. Ahmed and Abhijeet are not consistent with their views and reviews.

1. Sanchita is getting away with murder and she still gets at least 7 or 8.

2. Amit Paul consistently singls well and he is never getting more than 6.

3. Aneek and Raja are two different singers but that doesn't mean their scores have to be that different. They both (along with Amit) deserve good reviews and good scores.

4. Rajashri is an average dancer but somehow she's always managing high scores - what's up with that?

5. If you have already made up your mind that Abhishek and Kushal are the best dancers on the show and your scores and comments reflect that after each and every performance of theirs, how will that affect the psyche and performance of the other dancers? As judges, have Abhijit and Ahmed given any thought to that?

6. When Poonam and Apurva left, Ahmed's scores became the clincher. Why didn't they do the same when Emon and Sanchita went at each other? What was the point of having a dance contest between Purvi and Kushal?

7. Is it possible that the contestants from Sony are being given a step-motherly treatment from the organizers at Zee?

Judges and organizers are supposed to be impartial but somehow I am not getting that feeling. It looks like Ahmed and Abhijit have already made up their minds. The worst part of it is even after voting, the final fate rests in the hands of these two judges so Lord have mercy on the really talented ones.

Created

Last reply

Replies

6

Views

876

Users

5

Frequent Posters

Summer3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#2

This show was not meant to be serious as the Organisers are mixing Apples and Pears. I think it is supposed to be a fun programme the all the viewers and participants shoul enjoy themselves with the superb performances the singings and dancings; all done at the same time, so that it does not become monotonous.

But the two judges are getting too serious and the participants constantly hounded, as a result it is now in a complete Mess.

Edited by Summer3 - 17 years ago
pdesh thumbnail
20th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#3
Wonder how much of the voting is true....one week the jodi that was at the top is at the bottom in the next week....c'mon the public cannot be that fluctuating...so yeah, you have a valid point about the judges, maybe they've already decided upon who the winner pair is & now they are just playing along....reality TV is scripted!
Summer3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#4

Originally posted by: pdesh

Wonder how much of the voting is true....one week the jodi that was at the top is at the bottom in the next week....c'mon the public cannot be that fluctuating...so yeah, you have a valid point about the judges, maybe they've already decided upon who the winner pair is & now they are just playing along....reality TV is scripted!

Public voting is yucks ! If judges are also yucks, then we have no choice !

Best is a point system for cumulative good performances. The latest results having a higher weightage.

bellevue thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#5
I was told by my relaitive that these shows are not based on talent or vote counts only. A neice of mine from the industry told me that the contestants are told ahead of time that you will go next week regardless of vote counts. That means most of these shows are meant to make money only. My neice has already participated in one of the realitiy show and she will be in another one soon.
lilroses_89 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 17 years ago
#6
Thank you for making this topic.

The format and judging of ESBE is mind boggling.
There is too much to say about the format so I will stick with the judging. In the Harman-Priyanka episode, both Ahmed and Abhijit complimented Amit Paul for singing well. Neither of them criticized his performances or gave him any suggestions for improvement. After giving such positive comments, they give him scores of 5 and 6. Although, I felt he sang the song well, the judges may not have thought so. But, if they did find some fault or flaw in his singing, why did they not comment on that? Instead, they give him wonderful comments and disappointing scores. There is no congruency at all between comments and scores.

Back to the topic, many Zee singers and actors are getting favourable treatment. Rajshri, Sanchita just to name a few. Why did some of these talented stars even bother with this show??? 🤢
Summer3 thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Trailblazer Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 17 years ago
#7

Originally posted by: bellevue

I was told by my relaitive that these shows are not based on talent or vote counts only. A neice of mine from the industry told me that the contestants are told ahead of time that you will go next week regardless of vote counts. That means most of these shows are meant to make money only. My neice has already participated in one of the realitiy show and she will be in another one soon.

Bellvueji, looks like everyone wants to play "God" and decide things way ahead. thanks for the inside info. Please keep me updated on such info. But sometimes certain things do go wrong as in the case of Aamir in SRGMP which was a great negative publicity.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".