I don't care what Ahijit feels about singers not participating in this contest. I only care about what the judges have to say regarding the singers participating in this contest and I strongly feel that the judging is not up to par. Ahmed and Abhijeet are not consistent with their views and reviews.
1. Sanchita is getting away with murder and she still gets at least 7 or 8.
2. Amit Paul consistently singls well and he is never getting more than 6.
3. Aneek and Raja are two different singers but that doesn't mean their scores have to be that different. They both (along with Amit) deserve good reviews and good scores.
4. Rajashri is an average dancer but somehow she's always managing high scores - what's up with that?
5. If you have already made up your mind that Abhishek and Kushal are the best dancers on the show and your scores and comments reflect that after each and every performance of theirs, how will that affect the psyche and performance of the other dancers? As judges, have Abhijit and Ahmed given any thought to that?
6. When Poonam and Apurva left, Ahmed's scores became the clincher. Why didn't they do the same when Emon and Sanchita went at each other? What was the point of having a dance contest between Purvi and Kushal?
7. Is it possible that the contestants from Sony are being given a step-motherly treatment from the organizers at Zee?
Judges and organizers are supposed to be impartial but somehow I am not getting that feeling. It looks like Ahmed and Abhijit have already made up their minds. The worst part of it is even after voting, the final fate rests in the hands of these two judges so Lord have mercy on the really talented ones.