'Respected' 'almighty' Judges

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

RAJNISH GUPTA

@RAJNISHMJF1

Voyager

Posted: 17 years ago

#11

These judges are unpredictable....and tonite i m gonna make a very shocking news disclosed...be prepared to handle it😭

Quote

bellevue

@bellevue

Inactive

Posted: 17 years ago

#12

I don't think Rajashree deserved that kind of unfair treatment by those judges tonight. This was outright uncalled for. I feel sorry for this sweet and decent human being Amit too.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

ramas

@ramas

Alumni

+ 5

Posted: 17 years ago

#13

Originally posted by: bellevue

I don't think Rajashree deserved that kind of unfair treatment by those judges tonight. This was outright uncalled for. I feel sorry for this sweet and decent human being Amit too.

I somewhat agree. They were making raj feel like a villain here and aanchal was like an angel.

some one is honest and speaks against injustice does not mean they are villain. Aanchal did not perform good at all. I agree Aishwarya was good. But then amit never got the points he deserved.

i too feel sorry for raj as she was made feel worst just before she had to perform. Who would not get nervous with this kind of comments just before the performance.

if you can not encourage at least don't discourage the performer because you like other performers.

Edited by ramas - 17 years ago

Quote

bellevue

@bellevue

Inactive

Posted: 17 years ago

#14

Originally posted by: ramas
I somewhat agree. They were making raj feel like a villain here and aanchal was like an angel.

some one is honest and speaks against injustice does not mean they are villain. Aanchal did not perform good at all. I agree Aishwarya was good. But then amit never got the points he deserved.

i too feel sorry for raj as she was made feel worst just before she had to perform. Who would not get nervous with this kind of comments just before the performance.

if you can not encourage at least don't discourage the performer because you like other performers.

I just think that the judges should treat each and every contestant with respect. I was trying to think how I would have felt if I were in Raj's place, it felt quite painful to be in her shoes. No matter what , judges need to be more patient and treat them with a little more tlc.

Quote

ramas

@ramas

Alumni

+ 5

Posted: 17 years ago

#15

Originally posted by: bellevue

I just think that the judges should treat each and every contestant with respect. I was trying to think how I would have felt if I were in Raj's place, it felt quite painful to be in her shoes. No matter what , judges need to be more patient and treat them with a little more tlc.

I was thinking the same too. If someone had treated me like this just before I had to go and something imp. I too will get nervous. Some can hide their feelings and pretend tp smile while others are unable to and get upset does not mean they are villain.

Raj & amit are here because judges and audience save them so why this treatment?

Quote

larina

@larimel22

Navigator

Posted: 17 years ago

#16

Originally posted by: ChicksDigMe

At least, HR backed a good singer like Aneek. Nothing wrong with that.

Unfortunately, I agree with your prediction. The "judges" will make sure that Sanchita-Kushal pair will be there till the end.

I pity Amit Paul. He shouldn't have participated in this rigged show. I hope a much better future awaits him outside of this circus.

If Abhijeet is so fond of Sanchita, let him take it outside. Why this show? Why are other, more talented singers suffering because Abhijeet wants Sanchita to win at any cost? I mean, what have they agreed to before the show?

no matter how much these stupid judges try, the final voting is in the audience's hands. they cannot expect only certain people to win.😊😆

besides, sanchita is a good singer but there are equally and evn more talented ones on the show.

c'mon abhijeetda, remove the blindfold you have put over your eyes and SEE them!😡

Quote

xxangelxx

@xxangelxx

Explorer

Posted: 17 years ago

#17

Originally posted by: diplomats101
yeah even himesh is a better judge than them...

🤣 hahaha very well said. itz all BUllSH** and all da participints noe that they r way better than this. and 4 u judges go host a crapy show just as crap* as uu.

Quote

aditi

@addyydda

Voyager

Posted: 17 years ago

#18

the judges have always been biased for or against certain contestants frm the beginin...it just becums obvious wid every episode...
they feel they can say anythin n xpect the contestants 2 take it wid out a word....
amit no way deserved 1...n ahmeds excuse made no sense...even if abhijits scores were counted he still shud have given amit the marks he deserved...they need to rise above their stupid prejudices n biases n b more objective....
also they need 2 remember that all these contestants r successful in their respective fields n give them the due respect...

Quote

ChicksDigMe

@ChicksDigMe

Inactive

Posted: 17 years ago

#19

Originally posted by: addyydda
the judges have always been biased for or against certain contestants frm the beginin...it just becums obvious wid every episode...
they feel they can say anythin n xpect the contestants 2 take it wid out a word....
amit no way deserved 1...n ahmeds excuse made no sense...even if abhijits scores were counted he still shud have given amit the marks he deserved...they need to rise above their stupid prejudices n biases n b more objective....
also they need 2 remember that all these contestants r successful in their respective fields n give them the due respect...

Ahmed is drunk with power. He thinks he can say whatever he wants and do whatever he wants.

By the way, how did Ahmed know what score Abhijeet was going to give to Amit/Rajashree? Weren't the judges supposed to give scores independent of each other? That's how the last couple of eliminations were determined, right? First one judge cops out and gives the same number of marks to a contestant as though he didn't find any friggin' difference and then the second judge steps in who, surprise surprise, gives 1 more or 1 less than the other judge thus deciding the contestant's fate? Isn't it clear that they are colluding at each elimination phase by deciding before hand who will give what?

These "judges" have struggled so much in their careers that they now look at the contestants and think "hmmm, how come these guys are so popular? How come these guys are getting so much TV time and so much fame and popularity when we got nothing at that age? Let's do something about it"