Varun Kapoor played a character similar to lucky

luvakanksha thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#1
Hey guys,
Actually this post can only be understood by people who watched saraswatichandra
I became a fan of Varun from that show he played a character named Danny and surprisingly it was similar to Lucky (I hate lucky by the way, lucky as in the character not namish 😆). So I was free today just finished like 4 chapters and after that I started daydreaming 😆. So I just reflected that why the hell I loved Danny and now a similar character to him I hate. Danny was same as lucky impulsive, childish, protected, vulnerable and he never used to think before speaking.
So I concluded that it's because of the brilliance of cvs and story. Danny said so much in anger without thinking, he blamed his brother and wife of having an illicit relationship. But still his character was not hated. Infact it was sympathized with
I mean whenever he used to speak something idiotic the cvs made sure that he apologised and Danny used to apologize to saraswatichandra like a kid and also his actions were explained, each and every action of his was justified and was explained positively to viewers . Unfortunately I don't know why cvs don't see the same kind of potential in lucky's character? I mean Danny was a second lead on the show but lakshay is a parallel lead. I mean u can keep him impulsive and childish but yet positive. Like one of the biggest opportunity wasted because of the sanskar ragini jail swap. I mean if u go back to the episode the way lucky was apologising to ragini mistaking her to be sanskar was so touching, but cvs wasted it to rush ragya. Temish already look great together they had so much potential. Even Ragini for that matter could have been redeemed beautifully just like Sanskar, with lots of time and drama. Also I feel the kidnapping drama of ragini by lucky was totally unnecessary. I mean it took away a lot of innocence from lucky's character. The malkin track could have been pushed even without that because basically ragini was blackmailing dp for his secret.

PS - it's just my point of view, i was free and was getting bored needed a time pass so made this post
Pss- pls comment and share ur views too, u can bash freely 🤣 Because some people may find this post nonsense.
Edited by luvakanksha - 9 years ago

Created

Last reply

Replies

19

Views

2.8k

Users

13

Likes

50

Frequent Posters

pakh thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 90 Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#2
I have watched saraswatichandra akanksha...but on comparing danny's characterisation was way better than lucky...and that affair thing was because kusum used to love saras earlier and due to guman's drama...I know but still as u said he would say sorry of his every mistake...and that sorry was something which would effect viewers...actually danny was my fav even than saras...I love VK from saraswatichandra days...and I found his reactions according to situations...they may be impulsive but not totally wrong...and as u said we can easily connect with him and sympthasise with him...so o n a short note danny's character was better than lucky in every way according to me...not as a VK fan I am saying this but it really was...I used to love danny at the time when I just liked VK just normally😳😳...and baki I was not aregular viewer of saraswatichandra...have left in middle...but still that I was this was my opinion😃
luvakanksha thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: pakh

I have watched saraswatichandra akanksha...but on comparing danny's characterisation was way better than lucky...and that affair thing was because kusum used to love saras earlier and due to guman's drama...I know but still as u said he would say sorry of his every mistake...and that sorry was something which would effect viewers...actually danny was my fav even than saras...I love VK from saraswatichandra days...and I found his reactions according to situations...they may be impulsive but not totally wrong...and as u said we can easily connect with him and sympthasise with him...so o n a short note danny's character was better than lucky in every way according to me...not as a VK fan I am saying this but it really was...I used to love danny at the time when I just liked VK just normally😳😳...and baki I was not aregular viewer of saraswatichandra...have left in middle...but still that I was this was my opinion😃

Actually I know that danny's characterization was better than lucky(by the way I loved Danny over saras too😆)
I meant that the basic structure of danny's and Lucky's character was the same, u know impulsive, carefree, childish,protected etc etc etc. The difference was in handling the same structure by different cvs, differently. Lucky could have made a same impact like Danny if he was handled properly and positively by cvs.
Fari_15 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 4
Posted: 9 years ago
#4
Honestly I loved Danny character's in the show. Always wished he was given more screenspace and tracks in the show. But I do feel that Laksh's and Danny's character were very different, also their relationships with their brothers/cousins, so they really can't be compared.
luvakanksha thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#5

Originally posted by: Fari_15

Honestly I loved Danny character's in the show. Always wished he was given more screenspace and tracks in the show. But I do feel that Laksh's and Danny's character were very different, also their relationships with their brothers/cousins, so they really can't be compared.

How are the basic instinct of these 2 characters are different?
Yes lakshay was made negative by cvs but Danny was not, danny's impulsive actions were stopped where they were needed and the sanity of danny's character was maintained. I remember when he blamed saras and kusum for an illicit relationship he was angry just for an episode and after like 2 episode without any proves he realized his mistakes and apologized. That misunderstanding was not stretched for drama and his character was not maligned by cvs. in swaragini the cvs malign many characters pari ragini lucky, I don't know why they don't stop at the right time. Except sanskar most of the negative characters crossed limits of humanity in swaragini. Saraswatichandra had apt amount of drams and positivity of each character was maintained, except for hardcore negative character.
foresight thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#6

Originally posted by: luvakanksha

Hey guys,

Actually this post can only be understood by people who watched saraswatichandra
I became a fan of Varun from that show he played a character named Danny and surprisingly it was similar to Lucky (I hate lucky by the way, lucky as in the character not namish 😆). So I was free today just finished like 4 chapters and after that I started daydreaming 😆. So I just reflected that why the hell I loved Danny and now a similar character to him I hate. Danny was same as lucky impulsive, childish, protected, vulnerable and he never used to think before speaking.
So I concluded that it's because of the brilliance of cvs and story. Danny said so much in anger without thinking, he blamed his brother and wife of having an illicit relationship. But still his character was not hated. Infact it was sympathized with
I mean whenever he used to speak something idiotic the cvs made sure that he apologised and Danny used to apologize to saraswatichandra like a kid and also his actions were explained, each and every action of his was justified and was explained positively to viewers . Unfortunately I don't know why cvs don't see the same kind of potential in lucky's character? I mean Danny was a second lead on the show but lakshay is a parallel lead. I mean u can keep him impulsive and childish but yet positive. Like one of the biggest opportunity wasted because of the sanskar ragini jail swap. I mean if u go back to the episode the way lucky was apologising to ragini mistaking her to be sanskar was so touching, but cvs wasted it to rush ragya. Temish already look great together they had so much potential. Even Ragini for that matter could have been redeemed beautifully just like Sanskar, with lots of time and drama. Also I feel the kidnapping drama of ragini by lucky was totally unnecessary. I mean it took away a lot of innocence from lucky's character. The malkin track could have been pushed even without that because basically ragini was blackmailing dp for his secret.

PS - it's just my point of view, i was free and was getting bored needed a time pass so made this post
Pss- pls comment and share ur views too, u can bash freely 🤣 Because some people may find this post nonsense.


actually danny was similar to sanskar. leaving aside revenge piece. he was deeply in love with his wife but she loved his brother. he slowly made her fall in love with him by standing by her when the family was against her and then they got married again and remained together.

Edited by foresight - 9 years ago
soumi93 thumbnail
14th Anniversary Thumbnail Sparkler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 9 years ago
#7
Ya i agree actually i watched Vk's all shows almost bt not Saras as its nt according to my tym schedule i used to be in coaching classes dat tym.bt i watched it in Hotstar later.
Well Danny took the place of groom for his bro.as kusum loves Saras bt Saras loves Kumud and whatever drama created by him has a logical background.Ya he is impulsive,childish and short tempered too.But he always learns from his mistakes which Lucky never did reason ofcourse lack of skills from cvs.
And his bro Saras always used to scold/punish him if he finds his deed wrong and he needs to ask for proper apology to get that...
Lucky got away from his deeds like anything...and moreover that he has a extremity in his nature...like if he hates someone he goes all blind that if that person is right somehow then also he will nt admit that and similarly if h loves someone that also blind love, blind trust...there is no in between for him.
I wish SR cvs could hv make lucky lil bit more mature...
luvakanksha thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#8

Originally posted by: soumi93

Ya i agree actually i watched Vk's all shows almost bt not Saras as its nt according to my tym schedule i used to be in coaching classes dat tym.bt i watched it in Hotstar later.
Well Danny took the place of groom for his bro.as kusum loves Saras bt Saras loves Kumud and whatever drama created by him has a logical background.Ya he is impulsive,childish and short tempered too.But he always learns from his mistakes which Lucky never did reason ofcourse lack of skills from cvs.
And his bro Saras always used to scold/punish him if he finds his deed wrong and he needs to ask for proper apology to get that...
Lucky got away from his deeds like anything...and moreover that he has a extremity in his nature...like if he hates someone he goes all blind that if that person is right somehow then also he will nt admit that and similarly if h loves someone that also blind love, blind trust...there is no in between for him.
I wish SR cvs could hv make lucky lil bit more mature...

Exactly my point
Actually danny also got away with saras for many things, but his realization and guilt was shown due to which his character was loved.
Unfortunately lucky's realization and guilt is not shown by cvs, and his character is an extreme one but actually extremity is swaragini's CV's Forte they don't know when to stop a character's negativity, they went on extreme with all negative characters ragini, lucky, dadi, kavita, etc etc. I don't know how Sanskar was spared and his character was redeemed?
Nupur_5 thumbnail
9th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail Networker 2 Thumbnail
Posted: 9 years ago
#9
Ohh no! Danny was far different from the character Lakshy! Yes Danny was childish, sometimes behaved immature and sometimes got angry as well BUT no way he was impulsive!
He was really mature even such a young age! He handled his wife who was in love with his elder brother almost went wrong! In some way Danny was like Sanskaar!
And when Danny thought Cusum & Saras are wrong, he was under some circumstances created by his mother where he already was hurt bcoz he thought when he is nothing for his brother! He thought when he got arrested Saras didn't go to save him or bail him when he was frightened!
The truth is Danny always considered Saras his hero, in a way worship him! He believed, trusted his brother more than he did his parents! So he was hurt!
Bt it didn't take time for him to understand & apologize!
Plz don't compare Danny with Laksh! They are different!
Yes you can say that CVs played differently, Bt then also both CVs made two different characters & played them differently!
Even before VK started shooting, CVs of SaraswatiChandra said beforehand that the character Danny will be extremely positive!
Danny made mistake but not without any reason!
And he was not juvenile or impulsive! Which are main characteristics of Laksh!
Sakura24 thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail + 2
Posted: 9 years ago
#10
I think if you exclude the piece of information where Danny was Saras' bro...I guess he is more like Sanskar. The difference is Danny was more cheerful while Sanskar is kind of reserved...but that's the effect of his dark past.
What I agree is CVs played smart in SC and brought a very realistic turn in the incident you mention.
Rest I don't really find him similar to Lucky. His brother side was highlighted there in a way Lucky's never was in SR.
Just my opinion...don't mean to hurt anyone's emotions.

Sakura

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".