Originally posted by: shruthiravi
@Shivam I couldn't reply in detail to your comparison of 2 wars. You have done a wonderful comparison. Some points I have to highlight is
- Ram was a man with knowledge. He knew Sanskriti and its way of manipulating things very well. He knew to uphold Prakriti he has to break certain rules without people understanding they are breaking any rules or any change has happened. He along with his better half Sita walked a path which any human can walk if they intend to. It was a hard path and not the easy path. In this journey as Ram, Vishnu learned the prejudices and weakness of men, and how with support from Prakriti can mock the men. He held every woman in his life especially his better half in high esteem. He became Siyaram for her.- In Krishna avatar he comes with the inherent knowledge of both Sanskriti and Prakriti. We need to understand Ram understands Prakriti through Sita. But Krishna at birth itself knows Prakriti.He challenges Sanskriti even before his birth. That's why he requests Gowri to accompany him as Maya his kid sister at the time of his birth itself. Krishna not only corrects Adharma himself, but enables an Arjuna to eliminate adharma on his own.If you see Ramayana, Hanuman is adept at both Sanskriti and Prakriti and it is him who manages all the situations of grave danger in Ramayana for Ram. Whether finding Sita, whether going for sanjeevani, whether reaching Bharath before Agnipravesh it is all Hanuman. Ram learns Prakriti in Ram avatar. He is a normal man.To move to exceptional zone to be a Krishna you have to master Prakriti and Sanskriti at the beginning itself. For that you have to fight a war from childhood which Krishna does and then go and enable another to fight the warBut without walking Ram's path, without understanding Prakriti no one can guide another or become a Krishna