SKR:OF LOOPS AND SYMBOLISMS #4: 1/08: updated on pg. 132 - Page 86

@Shivam if Sulochana could be guided rightly by Mandodari even she could see Mandodari's vision. Problem was Mandodari never raised her voice enough till now. She was obeying her husband and MIL doing her duty as a wife. So Sulo was always at cross roads and ended up in the hands of Surpi. Bad influence.

My individual post on yesterday epi. Do read and comment. That post covers my analysis

Updated Seven Vows Chapter 39. Read and comment

@Savitha completely agree to you. Trijadha scene was beautiful I loved it. As I said in my analysis once again it showed unbound compassion of Ram

@shruti

You guys are all right.

Originally posted by: Shivam...

@shruti

Yesterday's scene was really having me compelled to draw comparison between the wars in the two epics .

1. both the wars took place to uphold the dignity of a woman , difference is that in ramayana the main culprit was ravan , in mahabharata there were several ( duryodhan dushaasan and other brothers )

2. Both involved death of a young prince , In ramayan it was akshay , in mahabharat there was abhimanyu , both died away from their father's eyes

3. The 5 pandavas in my view can be compared to the main army leaders in vaanar camp , like sugreeva , hanuman , lakshman , angad and jambvant , both guided by respective avataars of vishnu .

Lakshman looks like Arjun , instrumental in killing the most no. of strong enemy warriors.

4. last but not the least , Its rama and krishna , One in which Lord vishnu is in human avtaar , fights with dharmaa , creates chakravyus and inspires his army , Where as the other , a complete incarnation of vishnu , goes a step further , not only creates chakravyus , but also breaks them , stands for dharmaa , but to maintain dharma , doesnt hesitate to play tricks too.

Vanar sena started off well while the asur sena came to the battlefield without some gud strategy

When you know that u have some power which cannot be easily defeated by ur opponent then ur confidence level increases,,,,,, the same is dhumraksh's condition

Dhumraksh knows for sure that ram wouldn't be able to find him in all smoke,,,,, if ram isn't able to trace him then how will he kill him

A good leader knows about the strength, weakness and capability of his army men

Ravan knew about dhumraksh's strength and capability,,, so he sent him to kill the vanar sena nd not ram

If Dhumraksh would have killed ram then he would have gone away with all the credit nd ravan didn't want this


If there is no army to defend u then u can be easily defeated by ur opponent,,,,,, after each and every vanar would have been killed, ravan would have easily defeated ram as most of his strength would have been exhausted


As a good army leader, ram came to the rescue of his army

Dhumraksh's death was like a blow on ravan's face

An enraged meghnath wanted to enter the battlefield but ravan stopped him from going there,,,,, in a game we use our best moves at last , similarly ravan will use his best move I.E meghnath at last
Same is with ram, he'll also use his best move I.E lakshman at last



Ravan is worried,,,, his facial expression speaks just one line, "Dhumraksh toh gaya, ab kya hoga"


When u need help then there are many chances that you may join hands with ur enemy or someone whose worth is not that gud in ur eyes,, thus ravan had to go nd take Akampana's help

Tactfully ravan brought Akampana nd his fellow mates to his side

Akampana was easily brought to ravan's side

This means that Akampana is so silly that he couldn't identify ravan's real intentions

Trijeta is worried for ram, this means that she doesn't trust ram Completely nd she doubts his capability

Ram is not like Akampana that he will be easily fooled by ravan's silly tactics,,,, thus all efforts made by ravan are gonna go in vain

This post isnt about and symbolism and Loops