{|SKR- EPIC Distortion- Frustration Thread 4|}DT Nt pg 30/68/76 - Page 54

Originally posted by: Shivam...

Glad Bahubaali 2 is delayed , otherwise god knows what viewers would have been subjected to after Skr Writers got inspiration from that too😆

Originally posted by: shabari14

Hello, to understand why the CVS portrayed Sita Maa like this, you need to understand that SKR is just an interpretation of the Ramayana. The CVS are portraying what they think Sita might have went through and how she would have faced it. They wanted to show her as the person she was, strong, determined, loyal, and fearless. I am just voicing my opinion, so sorry if I hurt your feelings.

Gowri

Originally posted by: shabari14

Hello, to understand why the CVS portrayed Sita Maa like this, you need to understand that SKR is just an interpretation of the Ramayana. The CVS are portraying what they think Sita might have went through and how she would have faced it. They wanted to show her as the person she was, strong, determined, loyal, and fearless. I am just voicing my opinion, so sorry if I hurt your feelings.

Gowri

Originally posted by: shabari14

Hello, to understand why the CVS portrayed Sita Maa like this, you need to understand that SKR is just an interpretation of the Ramayana. The CVS are portraying what they think Sita might have went through and how she would have faced it. They wanted to show her as the person she was, strong, determined, loyal, and fearless. I am just voicing my opinion, so sorry if I hurt your feelings.

Gowri

For sure there was no need to chain her. It not just looked pathetic but also like with so many Asuras with weapons had to capture a mere human lady with chain as if she was a threat to all their life, if let free. Was Shurpanakha so weak that Sita had to be chained before she ventured to remove Sita's eyes? And was that necessary for Ravan to give free will to Meghanadh to use weapon on those who may try to help Sita? Would Meghnad used his weapon on his mother had Mandodari tried to come near Sita? True he would have done that with Shurpi or Sulochana but the Mighty king Ravan keeping a woman captive with chain was out of his character. That too when he clearly told Sita that he will not allow her to die so soon. The brave lady who was trying to knock her head off using his Chandrahas, would she have begged mearcy with him and asked for food?

Originally posted by: ..RamKiJanaki..

This is what happens when CVs deviate from original script and show nonsense like Ravan kidnapping Sita just for revenge and not out of lust.

Because StarRavan has no reason to send Sita to Ashok Vatika. He has no desire for her, he just wants her to suffer and feel pain.

Now we'll get to see StarRam riding to Lanka in Bahubali style on top of a horse lent by Sugriva. 😎

Originally posted by: .Vrish.

One thing though - I did enjoy Ravan's taunts to Shurpi on how she came back w/ her nose cut, and how she couldn't stop Sita from staring @ her 😆 And Meghnad stopping her from going ahead to hurt/kill Sita - just fantastic!!! 😎

but, the real story is messed up because these things.

Originally posted by: Meself

Exactly SIta is herself justifying her Haran, she will definitely chide Ram once he kills off Raavan! This is no Ramayan, this is one horrible fiction that uses the names of Gods and Goddesses!

very well said dear. . As per Valmiki, right from start, Ravan 's apkarn, Sita Maa looks at Ravan like a dirt anda person who is seeking his own destruction.