{|SKR- EPIC Distortion- Frustration Thread 4|}DT Nt pg 30/68/76 - Page 3

If surpanakha was a man, then would he have been pitied the same way? I guess no

Originally posted by: attubaby

Yes goin by the natire of sita ma, she can never scold Lakshman for cutting the nose dat too wen it was cut as part of defense.

Regardin madi expressns, yes she z quite gud in soft scenes. Earlier as unmarried princess, she was okay in arguments as well. i remember her scene with malyavan in mithila..dats wat is d apt one...it's mostly hard for me to relate to vanvaasi Sita of SKR wen she z in an argument...

@tssvenkat bu both in Ramayan n in SKR Lakshman z gonna be shown as attackin surpi as part of protectin Sita...anger n self defense do have a difference...here Sita ma was terrified seein d attack of surpi so Lakshman in an instantaneous rxn to the attack came to defend his Bhabhi.

yes, that's the real cause of shurpi's nose cutting, she was attacking sita and lakshman was protecting her. it was not some punnishment.

Originally posted by: attubaby

@tssvenkat bu both in Ramayan n in SKR Lakshman z gonna be shown as attackin surpi as part of protectin Sita...anger n self defense do have a difference...here Sita ma was terrified seein d attack of surpi so Lakshman in an instantaneous rxn to the attack came to defend his Bhabhi.

Hi guys unable to watch skr. Just reading your comments. And going by that laxman going to scolded by sita for cutting surpi nose.

Ok, I finished watching this week's episodes, and boy, were they as wierd

Originally posted by: jayvenk

Hi guys unable to watch skr. Just reading your comments. And going by that laxman going to scolded by sita for cutting surpi nose.

What are the writers getting at??

Hi guys..till now I've been a silent reader ..and i used to love siya ke ram...but ever since the vanvas track started i feel that the essence of ramayan itself is missing in siya ke ram . This new promo of portraying surpanakha as innocent is going too far. Having read both valmiki ramayan and ramcharitamanas by tulsidas..it is mentioned that lakshman reacted only after being prompted by ram to teach surpanakha a lesson. I dont know why the cvs are trying to portray lakshman's character in such a bad way..

Originally posted by: Justlikethat1

Jaya, it looks like the writers want the blame of the haran laid squarely on Lakshman 's feet. Heck.. why should they worry if it was Sita or Lakshman at fault?

Raavan in his lust and Surpi in her need for vengeance decided to do something that caused the destruction of their kingdom. But the writers😡

Btw seeing the video, it looked as if Lakshman in his anger advances on a surpi cowering in fear.

As I predicted, Lakshman will be put to blame for the haran, when it was Ravan's lust and Surpankha's need for revenge. And her lust as well.

I am fairly certain that Shri Ram, Shri Lakshman, Sita Ma and Shri Hanuman are very angry with the horrible portrayals of the other characters 😡😡