TVs big cause & effect - Page 7

Originally posted by: -Mano-

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">Aditi dear,this article is only on VFX</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">There are enough threads already for story discussion</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">It's for acknowledging the effort of the VFX team</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">If u find any plus or minus on VFX discuss it</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">I know u didn't start it</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">But I can say this only to u😃</font>

Mano. some people complained Bahubali resemblance for the way scene shot but they didn't complain VFX effects as bad. this article is about VFX right then one shouldn't bring Bahubali topic here.People can claim that we are disapproving CVS work but if we try to defense our POV,we will be labeled for Deviating topic. please tell me honestly, if someone questioned our comparisons at respective threads, we would've answered in those threads. but they questioned here, that's why we are here to answer. it's truth I'm hating CVS for handling Ramayana wrongly but I'm not blind to disapprove CVS hardworking.

Originally posted by: ..RamKiJanaki..

Yeah we'll have to agree to disagree, because you clearly view my posts as bashing whereas I view it as critiquing. It's nothing less than what many other frustrated souls are feeling.

Originally posted by: -Mano-

And may I know what "other frustrated souls "means

It's sarcastic or attacking or criticizing

I'm done with this topic. It's deviated way off course. Reporting the topic, and hope the mod closes it.

Originally posted by: iDea-yeS-viruS

[
Mano. some people complained Bahubali resemblance for the way scene shot but they didn't complain VFX effects as bad. this article is about VFX right then one shouldn't bring Bahubali topic here.People can claim that we are disapproving CVS work but if we try to defense our POV,we will be labeled for Deviating topic. please tell me honestly, if someone questioned our comparisons at respective threads, we would've answered in those threads. but they questioned here, that's why we are here to answer. it's truth I'm hating CVS for handling Ramayana wrongly but I'm not blind to disapprove CVS hardworking.

Originally posted by: ..RamKiJanaki..

I'm done with this topic. It's deviated way off course. Reporting the topic, and hope the mod closes it.

Originally posted by: -Mano-

<div><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">Many said it a copy of Bahubali</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">That scene which u or other talk about is VFX</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">while from the article it was clear that they have been working on it for eight months</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">Which makes it not a copy of Bahubali</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">her comment was based on the article</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">While story discussion has nothing to do with the article</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">It's total deviation</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">And many threads available for it</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">while there is very rare posts on technicalities</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">even if it's diverted to story discussion</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">Then what' the point of the article</font>

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2" color="#00cc99">I hope I am clear</font>

who said it took 8 months? isn't it CVS? or did anyone neutral witness their work? see.i'm not against your trust in CVS but you can't expect everyone to have same trust on CVS.

this is Ramayana. Anything shown out of epic will be considered trend works. Bahubali was 3 long years work. it's few scenes where seen before release. More than that,Bahubali released July but SKR started to air mid Nov. Teen Ram wouldn't be finalized at the moment. above all, there is no significance for why that scene shot. so it's normal to have such a doubts.yes, I do agree Story discussion isn't necessary here. but That scene was unnecessary that's why I put story here. it's better to end the topic because neither I nor you can't prove that scene whether copied or not.

Originally posted by: iDea-yeS-viruS

who said it took 8 months? isn't it CVS? or did anyone neutral witness their work? see.i'm not against your trust in CVS but you can't expect everyone to have same trust on CVS.

this is Ramayana. Anything shown out of epic will be considered trend works. Bahubali was 3 long years work. it's few scenes where seen before release. More than that,Bahubali released July but SKR started to air mid Nov. Teen Ram wouldn't be finalized at the moment. above all, there is no significance for why that scene shot. so it's normal to have such a doubts.yes, I do agree Story discussion isn't necessary here. but That scene was unnecessary that's why I put story here. it's better to end the topic because neither I nor you can't prove that scene whether copied or not.

who said to trust the comment? I never said anywhere It's copy of Bahubali but I'm not against those feeling that. I'm saying that people have their opinions which can't be proven. I'm not against the people who believing this work as CVS own creativity then why should I oppose the people who has opinion about copy.if you didn't believe Ramayana, it's your choice. I shouldn't poke you that Ramayana was the truth and have to be worshipped. believing Ramayana is my choice. yes. you do have rights for your opinion. but you see. there if difference between I don't think it's a copy of Bahubali and how can people think this as copy .first one is opinion and second is criticism. this debate not started because opinion. it started because criticized people's opinion. I didn't read the comments about comparison made before. but if they did criticism on people opinions, they are also wrong. my point is till fact is unproven, people have rights to have their opinions without questioning other's opinions.

Originally posted by: iDea-yeS-viruS

who said to trust the comment? I never said anywhere It's copy of Bahubali but I'm not against those feeling that. I'm saying that people have their opinions which can't be proven. I'm not against the people who believing this work as CVS own creativity then why should I oppose the people who has opinion about copy.if you didn't believe Ramayana, it's your choice. I shouldn't poke you that Ramayana was the truth and have to be worshipped. believing Ramayana is my choice. yes. you do have rights for your opinion. but you see. there if difference between I don't think it's a copy of Bahubali and how can people think this as copy .first one is opinion and second is criticism. this debate not started because opinion. it started because criticized people's opinion. I didn't read the comments about comparison made before. but if they did criticism on people opinions, they are also wrong. my point is till fact is unproven, people have rights to have their opinions without questioning other's opinions.