Comparisons may not be applicable. - Page 8

please I want to know what made misty suddenly

realize that she is not love with veer

. and if mishty really not in love with veer right from beginning then usne veer se shaadi ke liye Haan kyon ki

Originally posted by: sweetzzz

I know what you are saying. I think you have always stood to this. She either choose wrong or very wrong!!

But then the point is, we don't know how their relationship started, I mean veer and mishti's. S2 started off with their engagement. If their relationship truly started with love, we can say that she is wrong, but if it was arranged or if it was one sided, how can we claim her wrong in that case?

If she is wrong, every girl/boy who was loved one sided is wrong.

We need a back story to come to conclusions

Originally posted by: chicksoup

I hope you understand that Mishti is a flawed character. What you said is right. It was wrong of her to commit to Veer without forethought .

Mishti'so basis for choosing marriage itself and her approach to it was very flawed.

She believes her father cheated because her mother didn't give him enough time. That itself is the worst thinking she can have. It was never Maulis fault that Kunal chose Nandini.

Mishti has some twisted thinking whereby the thinks she has to approach life differently from her mother. Whatever she bases on this flawed thinking is going to turn into a mess. So yes, she has already created a mess.

Now it is up to her to know where she went wrong.

Sometimes when a partner leaves, it can be for the best. Mauli went through a lot of heart break. But Kunal was the only reason she got Ishaan who a way better human suited to her. In the end, life sorts itself out.

Originally posted by: anshvi

That is what my problem is !

What is the reason of y falling out of love despite being in a happy relation ?

People move out of relations whrn they are unhappy and when they find someone who makes them unhappy

An idiot will leave a happy relation without any reason

Y is wrong if she is in a happy relation and yet falls for someone without any reason and dumps x whom she committed to and loved too apprantely

This is where the makers have faltered

By your logic Y can fall in and out of love many times without a reason

By your logic no one in this world should marry or commit

Why not ? That's also an experience.

I don't know if you are married or not. I'm married for some years. When I was getting married or my friends / colleagues at work get married, they know very well what they have now may not be permanent. People change , feelings can change.
Nothing is constant in this world . No relationships remain the same except maybe between a parent and child. Yet they marry. They take THAT RiSK. They are WILLING to take that risk. There are no guarantees in a relationship.

Originally posted by: anshvi

If she falls for Ruhan and still married Veer then she will be more wrong

My point is she shouldn't have committed to him if she ever felt unsure

Now it's about choosing less wrong and more wrong for her

then why such logic are not apply in kunal and nandini case then why both were hated

Originally posted by: anshvi

If u watch the episode where we have a bua and Mishti convo she clearly states that Veer is her first bf and he will be her last indicating that it is a love marriage

Then Pari indicated the same by saying that love should be like Mishti and Veer and what they have for each other

Plus the way they behave with each other

They have shown it as a love marriage and certainly not a one sided love or an arranged marriage

So my point is based on the fact that MishVeer is a love marriage as shown in the show

Originally posted by: poiu123

Why not ? That's also an experience.

I don't know if you are married or not. I'm married for some years. When I was getting married or my friends / colleagues at work get married, they know very well what they have now may not be permanent. People change , feelings can change.
Nothing is constant in this world . No relationships remain the same except maybe between a parent and child. Yet they marry. They take THAT RiSK. They are WILLING to take that risk. There are no guarantees in a relationship.

Originally posted by: surabhi01

then why such logic are not apply in kunal and nandini case then why both were hated

Originally posted by: sweetzzz

See that's the problem. She never had been in a relationship before veer and she isn't sure of what love means. She wants commitment and what she saw in veer's commitment is what made her agree to the relationship. We don't know the back story of how these 2 started off. May be Mishti misunderstood her crush or infatuation with veer to love? Quite possible right!

Pari just looks of mishveer love from what they both show, she isn't aware of what Mishti is actually going through.