#KunalMauliForever

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

CIDfan4ever

@CIDfan4ever

Explorer

Posted: 6 years ago

#51

Originally posted by: FruitToasty

KuNan were promoted during EMA phase, after EMA revelation when so many fandoms loved Aditi's promoted the show was promoted in Mauli's name...
It was Mauli who promoted the time slot change, it was Mauli who was standing in the middle during karvachauth promo, her popularity was utilized by Colors...

KuNan didn't even get a promo for their Ding Ding scene, it was obvious that people don't like them and Colors channel did not promote them...

KuNan were promoted in initial phase to get hype for the show as they were obviously more popular, but I don't they ever got a promo after channel decided to cash on Mauli's popularity...

Similarly, if MauHaan are as popular as Mauli was they would have been promoted by the channel, the caption is very clear that they are eyeing for Manual fans...

Let me add that the show is going towards MauHaan only and this is just marketing strategy

I saw colors promoting kunan on Twitter even after the confrontation scene, when mouli's popularity was at its peak...kunan were hated by everyone and mouli was receiving supporting from all fandoms at that time...still they were promoting them as some great lovers...

I guess they want some negative buzz for the show since they can't show anything positive

Quote

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 6 years ago

#52

@ Fruit toasty I agree with you that a woman should not be labelled for her choice. Even I don't like it when woman who accept back their cheater husbands are called doormats . I don't agree with it. Freedom of choice absolutely. It's not the choice that's regressive or progressive but the reason behind it. A wife decides not to work after marriage because she wants to take care of her husband and kids it's not regressive because it's her choice but a wife is forced to do that because it's expected from her because husband expects hot food when he is back that is regressive. A wife accepting back a cheater husband because she thinks she has no alternate means of living is regressive but a wife accepting a cheater husband back because she loves him and wants to give their marriage a second chance not regressive. Manual happening is not regressive or progressive. It's the reason that is regressive or progressive. Which is what I said I see no justifiable reason for Maunal as of now.

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

FruitToasty

@FruitToasty

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 6 years ago

#53

Originally posted by: NainoMeinSapna

I was trying to stay away from the debate, but this is the most ridiculous thing I've ever read. I personally wouldn't be angry if Mauli chose Kunal, but comparing people expecting Mauli not to return to Kunal can't be compared to the medieval period, sorry but that's just ignorant and disrespectful. In today's day and age, women, including Mauli, have the right to choose what they want to do with their lives, which career they wish to pursue, whom they wish to marry, when they want to have kids, and etc. This was not true in the medieval times. Women had no rights and their occupations were usually "wife" and "mother," and some like the peasant class of women had it especially worse as they were oppressed. So comparing someone's opinion about women to the injustices women faced in the medieval ages is not fair. That would be like me saying "anyone who doesn't partake in sports is basically handicap."

Also, let's not forget, Mauli is just a character and any real person saying something about her is not going to affect her at all. You were the one who kept saying "Pari is just a character" not a real person so the same applies here, Mauli is just a character

First of all I don't really understand why people react so aggressively towards posts I make, it's not like I am making everyone read it...

The original post isn't even about the story, people started discussing story and I didn't reply to them, I reply only when people quote me or are talking to me...

I am not comparing people here, i didn't even start the whole debate of regressive, chauvinistic and frankly I didn't even read most of it, I just stated that people don't give women a right to choose...

Again you have quoted from the middle of a conversation so everything is lost there, the person I replied to was talking about progressive women in general, my comment was to that, progressive women are not restricted by rules or right and wrong, they have a right to choose...but when you decide wrong and right for them you challenge their ability to distinguish between the same, it's their life and their right... (Talking about progressive women in real world) about the character Mauli... Are jo karna hai kare

Quote

sweet_tania

@sweet_tania

Sparkler

+ 3

Posted: 6 years ago

#54

Originally posted by: Sabhayata
What's all in the past? Is Pari in the past? 😆 Or is she now being viewed as Mauli and Kunal's daughter 😆 . See what I am trying to say is no one will agree with KunalMauli forever because then what about Pari , is she an adopted child and not a love child? Has Kunal done or said anything to show that he never loved Nandini? That it was always Mauli for him? I don't think so. Let Kunal say these things from his mouth then we can discuss about forever 😆 . Regarding marketing technique to lure in viewers when EMA was at its peak I remember Drashti and Shakti went to a few cities to promote Silsila. There was no Aditi. But still Kunan was hated. Drashti and Shakti went to promote as they were the main leads it got nothing to do with Kunan being liked . Same is the case now , Kunal and Mauli are the leads. Any case which couple is liked more I can't say , I can only say in this forum and in YouTube I find most comments that are against Kunal mostly.

Agree YouTube IG people are mostly against kunal . All are bashing him and don't want him with mauli .

Majority public had never accepted kunal and nandini as a couple even after doing so much publicity and tried to cashing on so called kunan chemistry.

Regarding maunal forever than Pari is having blood of kunal and nandini. Pari's biological father is kunal and biological mother is Nandini. Pari is Nishani of kunal's true love . Nandini has spent 2 years with her own daughter pari whom she carried 9 month in her womb. Nandini and kunal has spent special moments together from pari's pregnancy news to pari's delivery to taking pari in their arms for the first time . As a proud parents kunal and nandini had enjoyed pari's childhood of that 2 years . No one can ever change the fact that nandini is pari's mother who is not her just biological mother but that mother who must be very loving for her daughter pari during those 2 years. Neither mauli is pari's biological mother nor she had spent more time with pari than nandini .

I laughed hard when people called pari as maunal' daughter. Nandini ne janm diya pari ko , breastfeed bhi kiya hoga pari ko , lori bhi gayi hogi pari ke liye, god mai sulaya bhi hoga nandini ne pari ko or Aj dekho ek maa se uske sare adhikar chin liye Gaye or maunal parents bann Gaye just because nandini mar gai hai isiliye 😡 Agar nandini zinda hoti to koi aisi bekar baat accept karti kyunki wo bhi kunal ke liye kafi possessive thi or pari ke liye bhi hogi shayad.

Shipping karte karte facts destroy nai kiye ja sakte . Pari can't be maunal's daughter because she is nandini 's daughter.

Quote

FruitToasty

@FruitToasty

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 6 years ago

#55

Originally posted by: Sabhayata
@ Fruit toasty I agree with you that a woman should not be labelled for her choice. Even I don't like it when woman who accept back their cheater husbands are called doormats . I don't agree with it. Freedom of choice absolutely. It's not the choice that's regressive or progressive but the reason behind it. A wife decides not to work after marriage because she wants to take care of her husband and kids it's not regressive because it's her choice but a wife is forced to do that because it's expected from her because husband expects hot food when he is back that is regressive. A wife accepting back a cheater husband because she thinks she has no alternate means of living is regressive but a wife accepting a cheater husband back because she loves him and wants to give their marriage a second chance not regressive. Manual happening is not regressive or progressive. It's the reason that is regressive or progressive. Which is what I said I see no justifiable reason for Maunal as of now.

Fair enough 🤗

Quote

Amritha

@amirthaa

Navigator

Posted: 6 years ago

#56

Common guys chill, It is just a promotion, thats it...nothing to add...

As all said, mauli will not return to kunal if kunal did not feel Kunan is wrong...

If kunal says that they were wrong and they just stayed together to support each other, then it is mauli's choice...

If kunal did not say Kunan as wrong, then no point of debate, Then it is only Mauhaan...

Regarding most people saying kunal loved nandhini post leap, I doubt..I agree he talked to nandhini's photo, but it was not like any kind of love scene, and moreover when so many times mehek asked kunal to join mauli, never did he utter that he will only love nandhini...

So its just 10 days, let kunal know the truth and comment about Kunan, then we will all decide...

Quote

Sapna

@NainoMeinSapna

Voyager

Posted: 6 years ago

#57

Originally posted by: FruitToasty

First of all I don't really understand why people react so aggressively towards posts I make, it's not like I am making everyone read it...

The original post isn't even about the story, people started discussing story and I didn't reply to them, I reply only when people quote me or are talking to me...

I am not comparing people here, i didn't even start the whole debate of regressive, chauvinistic and frankly I didn't even read most of it, I just stated that people don't give women a right to choose...

Again you have quoted from the middle of a conversation so everything is lost there, the person I replied to was talking about progressive women in general, my comment was to that, progressive women are not restricted by rules or right and wrong, they have a right to choose...but when you decide wrong and right for them you challenge their ability to distinguish between the same, it's their life and their right... (Talking about progressive women in real world) about the character Mauli... Are jo karna hai kare

It doesn't matter if you started the conversation or not. You said and I quote that "... you are the society and you are limiting women to do something which is considered good ... that's what they did in the medieval period, the right to choose was not for women and today its not for women ... its for society to decide ..." and that is clearly a comparison to women in the medieval ages.

I am not talking about progressive or regressive I was simply saying that this is an unfair comparison, women today have it much better than women in the medieval ages did.

Also, blaming me for quoting a conversation from the middle isnt an excuse because you can simply go back and quote them again like this:

Originally posted by: Poorabhforever
any progerssive modern woman with self-respect will never i repeat WILL NEVER ACCEPT her husband back after everything he did mauli accepting kunal will be promoting society set of rules and regulation because that what society expect a woman to do forgive forget and turn a blind eye i would prefer single mauli if she does not wants to marry ishaan but no maunal 🤢

which was a reply to this:

Originally posted by: FruitToasty
Kaha regressive and medieval age me chale gaye log..
It's all about set of rules for everyone, women were sold and degraded when they didn't follow rules in medieval period, women (Mauli) are sold for 2rs if they don't follow rules of this so called progressive period...

Right to freedom is not for her, if she wants to decide something it should be according to the rule, because rules are progressive and freedom to live happily is regressive...

Labeling women never goes out of style

But again what @Poorabhforever said doesn't have any relevance to my point at all because clearly you were comparing to the medieval times right from the get-go. It's my mistake I missed that otherwise I wouldve just quoted that directly. I hope you understand my point and don't make these types of comparisons again.

Edited by NainoMeinSapna - 6 years ago

Quote

an_am

@an_am

Rocker

Posted: 6 years ago

#58

Originally posted by: Sabhayata
wonderful examples. Yes Rick does love that child as his own even though he know it's not his. 👏 But like you said it wasn't EMA in fact once Rick came back wife went back to him and told Shaun that nothing can happen between them now. Regarding breaking bad as far as I remember she only has an affair after they had separated right ? Ya it could be more prevalent in Indian dramas but it's still very universal I mean even in books. Would 50 shades of grey be a hit if genders were reversed? I hardly think so.

in breaking bad, wife was involved in EMA while she was still living with her husband but she hated him for being a drug dealer and they had fights daily..

kunal ka to case hi alag hai, he was living happily with mauli and suddenly he started lusting over nandini for no reason..

i havent watched 50 shades...

talking about SBRK, i do agree that mauli should not take kunal back for the sake of her self respect but i would say she has already compromised her self respect when she admitted to kunal that she still loves him and being unable to control her feelings.. and now she is sleeping in the same bed with kunal.. she is still so comfortable with kunal, i dont think its impossible for maunal to end up together.. if she still loves her cheater ex, she can go back to him.. its her choice..

i dont expect any message from this show.. adultery is divine, thats the mental level of the writer..

Edited by ria_9 - 6 years ago

Quote

Sabhayata

@Sabhayata

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 6 years ago

#59

Originally posted by: ria_9

in breaking bad, wife was involved in EMA while she was still living with her husband but she hated him for being a drug dealer and they had fights daily..
kunal ka to case hi alag hai, he was living happily with mauli and suddenly he started lusting over nandini for no reason..
i havent watched 50 shades...

talking about SBRK, i do agree that mauli should not take kunal back for the sake of her self respect but i would say she has already compromised her self respect when she admitted to kunal that she still loves him and being unable to control her feelings.. and now she is sleeping in the same bed with kunal.. she is still so comfortable with kunal, i dont think its impossible for maunal to end up together.. if she still loves her cheater ex, she can go back to him.. its her choice..
i dont expect any message from this show.. adultery is divine, thats the mental level of the writer..

agreed 100%. Mauli admitting she loves Kunal was one of the lowest points of the show . In fact I had stopped watching at that time. But like you said what does one expect from a serial that shows EMA is divine .