Originally posted by: ReshmiRoy
Pretty dear another nice post - Kunal never complained but it was playing in his mind which led to the EMA> that is the only justification I get. For Ishan I do not feel his value in Mauli s life. Nor Mauli s value in his life. Probably it has not developed well because he was a cameo.
Relating to feelings, In BV we all used to think A had feelings for J. But when time came A expressed what she actually feels and chooses to move on. That was a fabulous episode. But you need guts to write such story lines. I do not have hope from SBRK. But impressed wth u.
anandi is a women of inspiration and also BV was a show of women enpowerment and social issues...there is a important that need to be address...child marriage is wrong...it should not be encouraged...so whatever it happened b/w jagya-anandi was relatable...whatever they showed after that was dealing with strong female dealing issues...
Silsila is a concept of EMA terming that there is no right n wrong in emotions...though we are against the idea of EMA...its wrong...it can never be right but in actual fact EMA is also never wrong in a certain section of people lives...they fall out of love from 1st marriage than they seek love for 2nd time...there is no wrong...the route that silsila went was totally haywire...it was bad...something that we can never digest...
this show is more of no right n wrong when it comes to emotions...so mauli being in love with kunu who betrayed her is also no wrong n right in it ...whatever decision mauli took in the end also there is no wrong n right in it
this show was always abt this bold concept of EMA n repercussion n effects of it but they destroyed the characters...they did not execute well thats it but it was never a show that gives out social message neither mauli is a anandi who tackle social issues...its more a complicated love triangle of trio in a concept of EMA...
Edited by Mages - 6 years ago
