Would have been better if dhrishti had mauli's role. - Page 3

I never bashed Nandini for involving in EMA.I found her fake and didn't able to connect with her and i hate her crying and shivering after EMA started as it looked fake.I always commented i am vexed with her Shivering.And at the same i didn't say i would have supported Nandini and EMA if it is played by Aditi,but i would have connected with her and would have liked Nandini too but never would have supported the character.Liking and supporting mei difference hota hai.I like Shivaay in IB,but i don't support him if he do any nonsense,i bash left and right but still like the character.

Originally posted by: sweet_tania

Aditi is so great artist that she has added her own charm and flavors beautifully in mauli's character. I can't forget her acting in confrontation scene in my entire life and can't imagine anyone else in place of aditi .

If we talk about role reversal than what drashti had done in mauli's character is like she had added flavor of 2 bottle glycerin and hand shivering while asking questions to kunal in confrontation scene . Can you imagine it !!! I can't .

Drashti has stardom and superficial fan following but for me , when it comes to acting, Aditi is powerhouse. Drashti is telly world's Katrina kaif and Aditi is telly world's Kajol . This is just my opinion and every one is entitled to their own opinion.

I just feel the cvs could have given some substance to nandini s role, dhrishti is wasted in it.

First of all, people need to stop acting like the more popular actor is the lead. It's not that hard to believe that there can be three leads at the same time as there have been other shows as such. Aditi despite not being as popular before this show has gained the most love because of sympathy for her character and her performance. It's actually so vapid to blame a certain actor not being given the role of the show's most loveable character for the show not going as well, ignoring the obvious reasons for the show's failure being excessive shameless romance of the EMA couple, their ignorant, selfish and innocent attitude towards Mauli and the affair, and that all we want to see is the EMA couple suffering karma, as viewers are not interested in seeing EMA and the show's immoral tag line being justified. In saying that they shouldn't have shown Mauli-Kunal marriage as perfect, is essentially saying in a way that the EMA would then be more justified and make fans of the EMA couple or the popular actress more happy. That's just ridiculous. I agree with you that they should have given more for drashti to do instead of trying to make her character look innocent.

Dd is the pnly reason mauli is not getting justice i jus wish DD was not there in this show at all!

I'm not fond of DD'S acting honestly. She acts the same way in all her shows. And that's my opinion.

However, when I did like Nandini, I liked the way DD portrayed her pain in the initial episodes. I will give that to her, she portrayed that well. Especially in the hotel room just before the pig saved her. She did a great job in those scenes.

But for me, no one can outdo the character of Mauli. Aditi slays that role so great, she's a queen. I can connect to Mauli because she's an everyday girl. Even if she played Nandini, she would slay as a villain.

Nandini doesn't do much beside cry or look pretty. I think nandini would've been better if it was a grey character. With many shows I watch I never saw a mistress portrayed in this manner. Mistresses are meant to break a home. They're selfish and greedy and insensitive. They are also supposed to be the villain. I have never saw a compassionate mistress, that does even make sense when you think of it.

I think DD would challenge herself a lot and her acting if she tried out a villain role. It's something different to see concerning her. Actors are supposed to challenge themselves.