whats the difference between nandini and rajdeep? - Page 7

so rajdeep isnt rapist in india, but what if he goes to america or a country where martial rape is considered rape and against the law. so a rapist in these countries but not a rapist in india, which is the truth/reality here. end of the day rape is forced sex on an unwilling participant, ti doesnt matter if their married or not, its the same no consent mean rape. if the wife say's no she doesnt want to and the husband forces her anyways despite her protest that would be rape. that's the way i see it personally. honestly feel bad for those who are forced into marriage and are abused like this by their "husbands" or have been sexually assaulted and are forced to marry their assaulter because as long as their married its not rape

Originally posted by: elim

rape definition: 1. to force someone to have sex when they are unwilling, using violence or threatening behaviour

it doesn't matter if it is not punishable offence.Its still called rape and Rajdeep is a rapist . Looks like people here only sympathies with women whose husband cheats them .Not rape or domestic violence victims .

Originally posted by: arshi_asya

She had absolute sympathy before but now it has been diluted with her wrong actions aginst the another.

Everyone cared for the boy and rushed to his help when he was spreading the news about wolf but when the wolf actually came, no one came to his defence. Nandini atleast had support before of 4 people, now she won't have that. And she herself is responsible for this fate of hers now. It will be her battle alone from now on.

And no one says, Rajdeep is any great. He is a creep as well who deserves his punishment.

All three Kunal-Nandini-Rajdeep are culprits for different acts. None is better or worse than the other.

Rajdeep violated her body, Kunal and Nandini violated the trust. Each of it henious and worse on its own level.

Originally posted by: bila_a

so rajdeep isnt rapist in india, but what if he goes to america or a country where martial rape is considered rape and against the law. so a rapist in these countries but not a rapist in india, which is the truth/reality here. end of the day rape is forced sex on an unwilling participant, ti doesnt matter if their married or not, its the same no consent mean rape. if the wife say's no she doesnt want to and the husband forces her anyways despite her protest that would be rape. that's the way i see it personally. honestly feel bad for those who are forced into marriage and are abused like this by their "husbands" or have been sexually assaulted and are forced to marry their assaulter because as long as their married its not rape

The comments here are disgusting .Comparing Nadini's wrongdoings to RAPE .like really?

In my opinion both are worst .It's like choosing less evil from both evils.Rajdeep is more evil than nandini becoz he is not only rapist he is abuser as well cheater also.He sold his wife to other man just for money.He abused nandini mentally as well as physically. She cheated with nandini by sleeping with other woman.Nandini is selfish and cheated upon her frnd but she didn't rape,abuse or sold human being just for money.So if i hv choose bw the two i will say nandini is better than rajdeep.

Originally posted by: arshi_asya

Some crimes are in grey zone. They are easy to prove in one situation but extremely difficult in the other.

POCSO act is also not properly used when the offender is close relative.

But forced sex in a marriage is a ground for divorce in India but not for prosecuting the husband.

Indian law considers only man as the rapist while woman can't be tried for rape as their penetration is an important criteria in court to prove rape. Where as per the consent, woman can be rapist too. This is the situation all around the world. MeToo came where women are encouraged for sharing their incidences of sexual harassment but when some men did it, they were laughed it.

Originally posted by: elim

there is no point of discussing when u think cheaters and rapists are same .bye .God bless u

Law is a grey area a lot of times and which is why legal procedures are complicated.

Originally posted by: bila_a

rape itself isnt a grey zone, its fully black, though it would be hard to prove when married but its still hard to prove with a he/said she said situation as well, and when alcohol involved. that's is what's messed up, men do get laughed at for being abused sexual or physically, but it will be men to laugh first as they see how can a man be abused by a women since they see women as the weaker sex still, and then women will follow them laughing as well, but from my experience it will be women as well who will be the biggest supporters first. its messed up women cant be considered rapists in india