Created

Last reply

Replies

545

Views

7k

Users

2

Likes

1

Frequent Posters

satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 2 days ago

https://psyche.co/guides/how-to-alter-the-passage-of-time-to-feel-fast-or-slow

How to alter the passage of time to feel fast or slow

Knowing the psychology behind why moments drag or whizz by can give you a degree of control over your experience of time

by Martin Wiener, associate professor of psychology

Time pervades every aspect of modern life. Sometimes, we wish we could speed it up; other times, we crave the ability to slow it down. The other day I was driving with my family for a short vacation and we hit traffic. My GPS told me that the slowdown would last only 10 minutes, but the cars were barely moving. Hot and tired, the wait was agonising. I looked ahead for the end of the tailback and wished that I could somehow fast-forward to that point. Yet later that same day, once at our destination, I knew that time would start to fly by. Now I wished to slow life down, to squeeze more out of the precious moments to come.

When you think about it, our everyday talk is infused with references to time as a prized resource. We talk about being ‘time poor’ (if we don’t have enough time to do the things we want) or being ‘time rich’ (if we are young and have our whole lives ahead of us). We agonise over ‘time wasters’, who extend the torture of boring meetings, and we lament ‘time sinks’ when we find ourselves stuck scrolling through apps on our phones. If there is one thing we agree on, it’s probably that we don’t have enough minutes in the day. ‘If only I had more time,’ we say.

So what if you could have more time? Well, of course you can’t literally slow down the clock, but you can change how the passage of time feels. I research time perception, and in this Guide I’m going to share some ways you can intentionally alter your sense of time’s passing.

Your sense of time originates in your brain. Research over the past three decades has found there is no unitary brain structure or neural location in which time ‘resides’. Rather, time in the brain appears distributed across a variety of structures, from the cerebellum, which hangs off the back of the brain, to the outer cerebral cortex. Experimental evidence suggests there is a separate clock for each of our senses – a clock for vision and a clock for sound, and so on – and that all of them are coordinated and aligned so that it takes careful probing in a psych lab for us to notice their differences. There is even a separate neural clock influenced by bodily signals – for instance, speeding up and slowing down your sense of time around each heartbeat.

With your perception of time constructed from a variety of neural sources, it may not be surprising to learn that it can stretch and contract like a rubber band, as both external and internal factors exert an influence. Lab experiments have shown that time can ‘dilate’ (that is, its passing feels slower) when viewing images that are emotional, frightening, awe-inspiring and vast, but also images that are brighter, louder, more numerous, moving or flickering. Time can also ‘contract’ (that is, seem speeded up) when viewing scenes that are cluttered, receding or when stimuli have less contrast with their background.

Recent work from my lab has also shown that there’s a two-way relationship between memorability and time perception: not only do inherently memorable images (such as a face, rather than a bland landscape) seem to last longer when viewed, but this relationship works in reverse too – images that are perceived to have longer durations are more likely to be remembered later, regardless of their inherent memorability. This suggests a fascinating connection between how we perceive time and how our memory systems function.

These and other lab findings on time perception and memory hint at ways you can deliberately choose to alter your perception of time. However, as I walk you through some basic ways to do this, remember the situation is not entirely straightforward because of an important distinction between ‘prospective’ time and ‘retrospective’ time. That is, there is a difference between how time feels when you’re in it, and how it seems when you look back at what happened – this is worth keeping in mind as you read on.

Pay attention to time to slow down the present

The more attention we focus on the passing of time, the more stretched out it becomes – at least in the moment. This is what is known as ‘prospective’ time – looking at time ahead of us as it passes. When you’re watching the clock in a traffic tailback or waiting in line for a rollercoaster, time drags painfully slowly. This is why we have the adage ‘A watched pot never boils.’

Conversely, when you’re distracted and not paying attention to time, then it can seem to whizz by, hence the adage ‘Time flies when you’re having fun.’ Curiously, this effect can work in both directions. If time seemed to fly, then you might infer that you had fun. This observation is based on a research study where participants were required to engage in various tasks with a clock that was either accurate or artificially speeded up. Participants in the sped-up time condition believed the experience was more enjoyable, simply because they’d been tricked into thinking that time had flown by.

This perception of the past is an example of ‘retrospective’ time – thinking back in your memory to judge how fast time went. It is quite common for there to be a disconnect between prospective and retrospective time perception. Something that is long ‘prospectively’ can appear short ‘retrospectively’, and vice versa. To return to the rollercoaster ride, the wait in line might have felt prospectively like it lasted forever compared with the ride itself but, looking back, you will likely remember much more about the fun and exhilarating ride – and so it might end up seeming stretched out in time (whereas the uneventful wait in line, seen in rear view, feels constricted).

Put simply, if you want to slow down time prospectively, as it unfolds, then pay attention to it. Savour it. Whether you’re on a family holiday or enjoying a lovely meal out, bringing your attention to the moment could help to slow it down. Conversely, if time is dragging while you’re waiting for a flight or enduring a dull lecture, the worst thing you can do is to watch the clock. Whether it’s people-watching at the airport or doodling, try to find a fun distraction instead.

Seek new experiences to make the past seem longer

Many of us have that sensation of looking back at the past month, year or decade and wondering where all the time went. In retrospect, it can feel shorter than we might like. This is about retrospective time, and it’s where engaging in new and exciting events and experiences can make a difference. They whirl by prospectively like tornadoes, but they leave trails in our memory that loom larger than mundane ones. You can exploit this principle to make the past seem longer and avoid that feeling of a month or year zipping by in the blink of an eye.

The reason for this phenomenon has to do with memory consolidation. Habitual activities – those you’ve mastered and that might have become part of the daily grind – require little effort or conscious thought, and so are encoded only weakly into memory. In contrast, novel activities and situations demand attention and so are more richly encoded. Crucially, the remembered timelines for new experiences are then stretched, compared with everyday ones. This is why peppering your year with fresh and unfamiliar experiences – be they vacations, meeting new people or trying new activities – can make the year feel more enduring in retrospect.

At a physiological level, one reason for this effect on retrospective time perception might have to do with the greater neural encoding and metabolic cost required for forming richer memories (which might be why you get so hungry on vacation). It’s possible that the brain then interprets this extra processing and metabolism as meaning more things happened, which leads to extended subjective time when looking back.

To increase the length of retrospective time, while avoiding each day prospectively flying by, the best advice then is to seek new experiences periodically, while remembering to also return to the comfort of the routine. The more exciting moments may not last as long at the time, but the duration in memory will feel longer.

Use meditation to slow down the present in an enjoyable way

The gist of what I’ve told you so far might give you the impression that you must choose between either slowing down time in the moment (by clock-watching and engaging in routine, boring tasks) or slowing down time as it feels in the past (by engaging in fun, time-accelerating, exciting activities in the here and now). However, this isn’t strictly true. There’s a third way that involves stretching and dilating time in the present (that is, prospectively) in a way that can be enjoyable.

A clue to this approach comes from the way that time is briefly dilated when we get back into our routines after a vacation, not in a way that makes them drag, but in a way that makes them seem more enjoyable again.

The key may be finding situations where your focus on time’s passage leads to enjoyment rather than boredom. An activity where this can happen is meditation. Certain kinds of meditation, such as transcendental and mindfulness, allow the individual to experience time but without any discomfort. Some studies suggest that time dilates during meditation, yet practitioners find this to be a pleasurable experience.

Taking up a form of meditative practice could therefore give you a third way to manipulate time – to slow it down in the moment, but not in a way that drags. The mindful skills you learn in meditation could also help you to savour precious, pleasurable moments in life, so that they don’t seem to fly by too quickly.

Embrace the malleability of time

Besides the specific approaches above, a better way to get more control of time may be simply to be aware of it, what the geologist Marcia Bjornerud calls ‘timefulness’. Another term for this is ‘metacognition’, or being aware of your own thought processes. In this way of thinking, you are aware that time is a limited resource, but you also recognise that your perception of it is flexible and adaptable, according to your needs.

This awareness of time’s malleability can be helpful when you’re experiencing highs (you might think to yourself: ‘This day is passing fast, but long will it will be remembered’) and painful lows (you might think to yourself: ‘This is going slowly, but it too shall pass’). It can also serve as a way to get more from everyday situations: when you begin to notice the different ways that time’s speed seems to change, you can use it as a shortcut to knowing when you’re overly distracted, bored, impatient, excited or content.

Martin Wiener is an associate professor in the Department of Psychology at George Mason University in Virginia, US. He is an expert in time perception and temporal processing. His work has been featured in The Economist, The Guardian and on the BBC.

satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 2 days ago


THIS IS A "MEMBERS ONLY" POST
The Author of this post have chosen to restrict the content of this Post to members only.


satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: a day ago
satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: a day ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0siYUjV9UM&list=RDK0siYUjV9UM&start_radio=1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0uP1ZoAGdL0&list=RD0uP1ZoAGdL0&start_radio=1




Mama, I am coming home

When I came to Madras to live under the shelter of my aunt, I quickly discovered that life in the city, particularly in our house, was all about the latest styles and trends, be it music or be it clothes.

All of you know that I was born in Bangalore to a Telugu family, and that I spent the first five years of my life in the gullies of Dodda Mavalli.

Our little house was situated amongst other even smaller houses on a piece of land that acted as a bridge connecting two tiny lanes. I am not sure but I think it is safe to say that there were about eight to ten houses that stood in parallel and opposite on the land bridge that connected the two gullies.

The only languages I knew and spoke well back then were Kannada and Telugu, although I doubt if I know how to read and write in them in communication modes. But I was also familiar with Hindi and Tamil back then.

Today, the words cosmopolitan and metropolitan are clichéd terms, but trust me when I tell you that, even in that small piece of land between two small lanes existed a sort of cosmopolitan life several decades ago.

Both lanes were overflowing with people from all walks of life and religions, and all talking different languages.

And the music.....MGR and Sivaji will be roaring through TMS, vying to be heard over Kishore and Rafi and at the same time, Ghandasala would be vying with NTR against Dr. Rajkumar.

English, sat? What about English songs? I am sorry, I did not even know English Rhymes back then and only heard about it when I came to Chennai.

My aunt and other elders looked at me, the newly minted orphan that stood a foot above the ground and decided, ' we will do good by him and not let him become the drunkard and gambler that his dad was..'

Well, they sent me to Don Bosco for my 1st std admission test, and yes.. a big fat zero was awarded to me.

No comprende English señor, but I comprende telugu and kannada and scribbled something in the paper and so, from there i was admitted to a small primary school near our house in Mahalingapuram.

I think the first song I heard in Madras was " Thaaye karumari and Mariamma engal Mariamma " sung by Lourde-Mary Rajeswari, better known as L. R. Eswari. That was done regularly on Fridays and pooja days, and then it was all about Hindi and English songs.

I began hearing and dancing to Abba, Beatles and osibisa and to all Kishore da and R.D.Burman songs.

No, yes, believe it. No songs from MGR and Sivaji, and that too in Namma Madras. Well, not that I missed them too much, for I was too caught up in growing up.

Then came hostel and school, and I was introduced to Genesis, Jethro Tull through Dattatri and Ram Seshadri.

But, it was in 1984 in Alan's house that I took my next step and proceeded to a higher level in music knowledge when Bartley junior introduced me to Pink Floyd, Dire Straits, Alan Parsons project, Black sabbath, Led Zeppelin, Scorpions, and so much more.

My dear friend Alan, Alee boy as we used to call him also introduced me to Beethoven and Bach and when I tried to speak up about Abba and Boney-m, he used to look at me and snarl, and growl, ' P..sy music ' and looked at me questioningly and I would whine, ' No da, I am no P..sy.'

I wonder what he would have said or how he would have reacted if I brought up the topics about Ghandasala and TMS. I think he would have strangled me with his bare hands without a sweat. He was nearly 100 kilos and I was about 49 or 50 kilos. No wonder they called me Skeletor.

The lead singer of Black Sabbath, Ozzy Osbourne passed away a few days ago and closing my eyes, I thought of Alee boy and sniggered, ' Machaan, now you have Ozzy himself up there to sing for you. Enjoy buddy.'

I listen to a few of Ozzie's songs very often and they are, " dreamer, you're no different to me, changes and yes, mama i'm Coming Home.'

Alan's mum, Valerie or Val as she was popularly known, left in April, and Alee boy followed her home in June.

Now with Ozzy gone, I was hard-pressed to find a better title than "Mama I'm coming home ' for both Alan and Ozzy.

Times have changed and times are strange

Here I come but I ain't the same

Mama, I'm coming home

Times go bye, seems to be

You could have been a better friend to me

Mama, I'm coming home

You took me in and you drove me out

Yeah, you had me hypnotized, yeah

Lost and found and turned around

By the fire in your eyes

You made me cry, you told me lies

But I can't stand to say goodbye

Mama, I'm coming home

I could be right, I could be wrong

It hurts so bad it's been so long

Mama, I'm coming home

Selfish love yeah we're both alone

The ride before the fall, yeah

But I'm gonna take this heart of stone

I just got to have it all

I've seen your face a hundred times

Everyday we've been apart

And I don't care about the sunshine, yeah

'Cause mama, mama, I'm coming home

I'm coming home

You took me in and you drove me out

Yeah, you had me hypnotized

Lost and found and turned around

By the fire in your eyes

I've seen your face a thousand times

Everyday we've been apart

And I don't care about the sunshine, yeah

'Cause mama, mama, I'm coming home

I'm coming home, I'm coming home

I'm coming home

Edited by satish_2025 - a day ago
satish_2025 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 500 Thumbnail + 5
Posted: 22 hours ago

https://psyche.co/ideas/does-progress-seem-slower-when-you-constantly-check-on-it?utm_source=Psyche+Magazine&utm_campaign=5e832e126f-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2025_08_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-8e23a7006c-838120577

Does progress seem slower when you constantly check on it?

by André Vaz, social psychologist

Research on how we perceive the rate of change shows how you can be strategic about goal tracking and boost your motivation

Suppose you just started training for a marathon. You’ve never done anything like this before, but you’re hoping that seeing improvements in your fitness levels will motivate you to be a more active and healthier person. The marathon is a year away, and you have plenty of time to reach your desired condition. Of course, that also means you could lose steam between now and then – especially if you don’t feel like you’re getting better. So, measuring your progress seems critical. What’s the best way to go about doing that?

Running is just one of many contexts where the way you gauge progress matters. Other examples could be tracking how much money you’re saving for a much-needed vacation; how many pages of a paper, book or script you’ve written; or how much ground your team is covering on an important project at work. In these and other cases, underestimating or overestimating the pace of change can cause you trouble: misjudge how quickly you’re actually saving money, for example, and your dream vacation will stay a dream, perhaps indefinitely.

Sometimes, an accurate perception of change is essential. And in some contexts, just the feeling that change is happening quickly (or slowly) is important. If you don’t see satisfactory improvements in your running times, your spirits may start to dwindle. In fact, studies show a link between how fast or slow a person feels they’re progressing towards a goal and their motivation to continue.

In any case, a key question is how closely you should be watching your running times, your savings, etc – that is, how frequently you should monitor progress. If you want to make an accurate judgment of how progress is going, it seems intuitive that frequent monitoring would help. On the other hand, popular wisdom suggests that watching too intently can distort your sense of how quickly or slowly something is proceeding: as the saying goes: ‘A watched pot never boils.’

My collaborators and I wanted to find out how the frequency of monitoring actually affects perceptions of change. In a recent study, we placed people in a managerial role at an imagined factory, where they tracked how many items some employees produced over a certain period. One employee was monitored daily, while another was monitored only every few days. Crucially, both employees produced items at the same rate. This means that the frequently monitored employee had less to show each time they were checked on, since less time had passed. At the end of the simulation, we measured the study participants’ impressions of each employee. As we suspected, our participants believed that the more-frequently monitored employee had been less productive, and they predicted that this employee would produce less than their co-worker over the following two days.

We call this the monitoring frequency effect: as the frequency of monitoring goes up, the perceived rate of change goes down. The factory scenario may seem somewhat artificial by itself. Still, we found the same results when people were tracking the daily spread of a contagious disease in different cities, annual CO2 emissions in different countries, weekly operating profits from investment opportunities, and even something as simple as a boy’s growth over the span of a couple of years. In all cases, change seemed slower when it was checked on more frequently.

People were willing to bet on it that less was changing when something was monitored more frequently

Why might that be? Although monitoring change infrequently means that there’s more new change to see each time you check in, our study participants still experienced the passage of time, and they understood that what they saw at each check-in reflected how much had changed since the last time they checked.

One possibility, of course, is that our participants were distracted or not sufficiently motivated. To test this, we offered people the possibility of a bonus payment if they could accurately track the rate of change in both the rarely and the frequently monitored targets. Researchers in psychology and economics call this ‘incentive compatibility’: participants are encouraged to be motivated and to disclose their true judgments. The results were clear – it didn’t make a difference. Not only did people believe less was changing when something was monitored more frequently, they were also willing to bet on it.

The fact that our results persisted even when people were motivated to be accurate suggests that this effect is not easily avoidable. However, it still does not explain why people perceive change as slower when they monitor it more frequently – why the watched pot might seem so slow to boil.

At the end of one study, we asked people to recall how often they had monitored each employee, as well as each employee’s progress at each check-in. The effect did not seem to be caused by people misremembering how much time passed in between check-ins. Instead, it seems that people weren’t making use of all the information that they did remember.

This actually aligns with the findings of some decades-old research: people tend to disproportionately focus on the most salient features of something when they make judgments about it, while neglecting less conspicuous features. This can look like, for example, people preferring a gamble with odds of 9/100 over one whose odds are 1/10, because they focus on the number of favourable results (9 vs 1) and neglect the total number of possible outcomes. In the case of tracking progress, the amount of change that people can see every time they check is highly salient – after all, that’s exactly what people look for – whereas the period that the change corresponds to is merely background information. So, if you’re monitoring a writing project, writing 30 pages per month might seem like better progress than setting a pace of 10 pages per week, even though the latter is actually more productive.

Unfortunately, this can make people feel discouraged since the goal appears less attainable

The consequences could be insidious when combined with the sorts of motivations that drive people to monitor more or less frequently. Consider the case of a manager who hears that a new employee is lazy and tends to slack off. This manager might decide that such an employee needs to be watched closely, to make sure the employee’s productivity is up to par. If the manager does not mentally correct for the (little) time that is passing between check-ins, then the minimal changes that they observe will serve only to confirm the suspicion that the employee is unproductive.

Or consider the marathon-training runner or someone working toward another goal. As things become more important to us, we tend to want to check in on them more often – which, as we’ve learned, only makes them seem as though they change more slowly. Unfortunately, this can make people feel discouraged since the goal appears less attainable, which in turn might lead people to aim lower, or to just give up on their goal altogether.

All that being said, the situation is not hopeless. When we presented people with information about CO2 emissions across the years in a single table, where both the emissions and the periods they corresponded to were fully outlined, the monitoring frequency effect was much smaller. In cases where accuracy is important (for example when monitoring multiple targets: employees, investments), getting a bird’s-eye view instead of making comparisons on a moment-by-moment basis seems to help. It’s likely that doing the actual mathematics – calculating the ratio of change per unit of time for the different targets – will improve it further.

More interesting are the cases where the perceived speed of change matters more than how accurate that perception is. Whether seeing improvements (savings gained, weight lost, running times trimmed) is what keeps you going, or you just want to avoid being overwhelmed by too many updates, you can use what we’ve learned by strategically adapting your monitoring approach. If your motivation wavers as you pursue your goal, despite your continued progress, then monitoring yourself less frequently might make your gains seem more impressive and encouraging. In short, being slower to check your progress could help you appreciate how quickly you’re progressing.

André Vaz is a postdoctoral researcher in the Social Cognition lab at Ruhr Universität Bochum in Germany. His research focuses on how people form judgments and make decisions, particularly examining cognitive biases and the dynamics of social evaluation.

Related Topics

Sensational South Thumbnail

Posted by: Leprechaun

1 years ago

From & To Sathish #6

Previous thread links: From To Satish #1 From To Sathish #2 From To Sathish #3 From To Sathish #4 From To Sathish #5

Expand ▼
Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".