Maternal Family? Don't they mean anything? - Page 4

Originally posted by: jahbless

Come on this sgp lovey dovey bs is not realistic. And people in real life are not so detached from their maternal home and quick to forget it when they get married. Mother is a mother and no thaya saas (badi ma) can ever take the place of the birth mother. It's absolutely unrealistic and and yes it doesn't matter if she went to her dad on her own or by pressure. The main thing is that why does she have ideas in her head that she is a kashyap and not a Bajpai it doesn't matter. She is still his daughter and legally the heiress to his money he doesn't have any other legal descendants except for her sister. Even after a female is married she still has full rights as her parents daughter and shouldn't be taught that she is leaving or becoming a foreigner. I think this is all b.s. And yes it is conservative thinking because women are not property to be given away (kanyadaan). I have been raised in the west and I have never encountered this type of mentality.

If her in-laws are middle class then shit... Share and care spread the wealth. Why is her dad hoarding all the money anyways what is he trying to prove.

Originally posted by: Tani91

Um have you even watched the show???like seriously😕🥱

KK does not hoard his money he was ready to give it, Suhana herself refused it

Yes a mother in law cannot take place of a mother but in the case of BM Suhana has found a mother in her because she doesn't have her own and what's so wrong in that?? So according to your logic if orphans find a mother in someone e,we then that becomes wrong now does it

Once again they didn't force her to NOT take money from them, she willingly refused her father for God knows whatever reason and KK was proud to see her grow up into a responsible person arather than a complete spoilt brat. And who the hell said that she will not get his money, just a few episodes ago KK himself came to them and said that after he dies everything will go to both of them so how in e world does that equal conservative thought

Originally posted by: Tani91

Um have you even watched the show???like seriously😕🥱

KK does not hoard his money he was ready to give it, Suhana herself refused it

Yes a mother in law cannot take place of a mother but in the case of BM Suhana has found a mother in her because she doesn't have her own and what's so wrong in that?? So according to your logic if orphans find a mother in someone e,we then that becomes wrong now does it

Once again they didn't force her to NOT take money from them, she willingly refused her father for God knows whatever reason and KK was proud to see her grow up into a responsible person arather than a complete spoilt brat. And who the hell said that she will not get his money, just a few episodes ago KK himself came to them and said that after he dies everything will go to both of them so how in e world does that equal conservative thought

Originally posted by: rightnow

Why is it not right to take money from father after marriage? Especially when she is a heiress along with her sister? And when she was suffering from life threatening illness? And there is always big talk that KK belongs to them as well. If he really belongs, why cant he help his daughter instead of making Alok debt ridden? They never showed clearly how Alok is managing so much including his saas medical bills though they always show their family as counting pennies. In real life no one minds all these things and modern real life people are more practical.

Originally posted by: ice.maiden

Sheemu dear, this topic is very close to my heart.. I hate it when people promote the idea that a girl ceases to belong to her maternal family after her marriage.. The whole ladki parayi ho jati hain concept gets on my nerves.. I respect my in-laws a lot and they in turn respect the relationship I have with my parents..
I hate it when they keep saying in this show that ab Suhana aap ki nahin hamari beti hain.. I know the intentions are good, but if any one says this to my parents in front of me, I will really not like it..

Originally posted by: jahbless

There is nothing wrong with her taking money from her dad and it doesn't make her responsible if she doesn't take money form her dad. There is no connection between responsibility and asking her dad for money. Easy money doesn't make someone a spoilt brat. Just because someone has money doesn't equate to being spoiled. Especially in a time when she needs it. Suhana's in-laws think too much of prestige izaaat and those sort of ideas. They think that if she takes money from her dad after marriage her in law family ki izaaat kaam hojayegi. These are all social structures that really have no place in society when dealing with real hardships in life. And yes... Why would they want alok to struggle putting pennies together when it wouldn't! Even make a dent in kk bank balance. Yes... The whole Ladki parayi thing is very outdated and absolutely unrealistic in real life.

This is all a method of keeping women under lock and key and brainwashing them and their parents to believe that they will have to be given away and that they will no longer be as tied to their parents.

Originally posted by: Tani91

This right here proves that you obviously don't even watch the show so I won't even bother argue with you🥱 the fact that you think that they brainwash her like she is a piece of roper...clearly we are watching two completey different shows are you mistaking SGP for SNS maybe

Originally posted by: MadameX

[

True...credit should be given where it's due. About the part that Suhana is overlooking him...I want to add that maybe KK's method of raising Suhana up is also a big factor in all this. He has really spoiled her well in just about everything. What Suhana demanded, she received. And then combined with that, KK had a kind of relationship with Suhana wherein she is absolutely free to speak her mind...and pretty much be like best friends with him. In Suhana's mind, KK seems more like a great friend than a dad. And the negative effects of that is starting to be seen (or actually has been shown since the beginning). Suhana has no qualms in raising glassware in a move to show like she's about to hit her dad. To me, that is like a big NO-NO. A father is a father, not a friend. One should never raise anything against their parents like that, whether the intent is good or not. That's just plain wrong and one of the hard to digest things about Suhana's character. 😆 But I account that to KK's methods of raising Suhana and spoiling her combined with lack of sensibility on Suhana's part. So I guess it's probably not too surprising that Suhana overlooks KK. 😕

Originally posted by: ice.maiden

Sheemu dear, this topic is very close to my heart.. I hate it when people promote the idea that a girl ceases to belong to her maternal family after her marriage.. The whole ladki parayi ho jati hain concept gets on my nerves.. I respect my in-laws a lot and they in turn respect the relationship I have with my parents..
I hate it when they keep saying in this show that ab Suhana aap ki nahin hamari beti hain.. I know the intentions are good, but if any one says this to my parents in front of me, I will really not like it..