Crisp Bytes SC - 2nd Aug 13 - Page 5

Created

Last reply

Replies

46

Views

4.2k

Users

17

Likes

155

Frequent Posters

-Ivy- thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#41

Originally posted by: smrth


Kudos IVY ji👏...first time here I am seeing a closer analysis of her true internal fight that is blazed in the work (has been trying to share it hoarse for couple of weeks). Lines- indeed; real, sharp and cutting. It's cutting edges of her 'conscience' that has been cruelly, forcefully set on/against her own integrity that's bleeding her. Not Pramad's violence that Saras is so intent to stop at the moment. Remember, Saras is not wrong. The physical degradation is first step to a repair. It must stop. But real wound? How would he, or for that matter even Kumud herself, ever going to bridge the 'chasm'? As per book, it never was. But thanks, first time I am seeing here an analysis closer to the work. Otherwise most of the time, looking through our 'right', urbane, politically correct views- how she is 'incomprehensible', inconsistent, lost and not her 'real self' etc. Ironically, those 'observations' are right! But not the diagnosis!


Smrth Bhai... It is the execution that is playing spoilsport here. We let ourselves be carried astray by little irks... Thus all we all can make are "observations"... The past two epi's are testament to that. Filler episodes, where there shouldn't be any because it just disrupts momentum. Maybe I'm being too uncompromising but I would have preferred to wait for Saras and Kumud scenes whole of last week, until J got back so that the true affect, the actual internal struggle could be highlighted. Hoping that this week more than makes up for it. The last two epi's Kumud actually came off as "inconsistent" to me... Jennifer's execution seemed a little off... And this depiction bears on the overall pyschological identikit of Kumudsundari's that we're striving to make. It does disservice to it.

@Bold Intriguing. But here Kumud will have to bridge chasm right? Indications point to it, and book vision needs to be adapted to suit palate of medium's audiences. Otherwise how would it look in the long term... Kumudsundari "incomprehensible, inconsistent and lost"... Audiences will dis-identify, will even lose empathy... No desire to define diagnosis. Observations only will suffice

Edited by IdiotViewer - 12 years ago
smrth thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#42

Originally posted by: IdiotViewer


Smrth Bhai... It is the execution that is playing spoilsport here. We let ourselves be carried astray by little irks... Thus all we all can make are "observations"... The past two epi's are testament to that. Filler episodes, where there shouldn't be any because it just disrupts momentum. Maybe I'm being too uncompromising but I would have preferred to wait for Saras and Kumud scenes whole of last week, until J got back so that the true affect, the actual internal struggle could be highlighted. Hoping that this week more than makes up for it. The last two epi's Kumud actually came off as "inconsistent" to me... Jennifer's execution seemed a little off... And this depiction bears on the overall pyschological identikit of Kumudsundari's that we're striving to make. It does disservice to it.

@Bold Intriguing. But here Kumud will have to bridge chasm right? Indications point to it, and book vision needs to be adapted to suit palate of medium's audiences. Otherwise how would it look in the long term... Kumudsundari "incomprehensible, inconsistent and lost"... Audiences will dis-identify, will even lose empathy... No desire to define diagnosis. Observations only will suffice

Actually you are right Ivy, 'diagnosis' is not required per se. Observations are suffice for the intent of a 'watch'. But when we observe 'remedies' also our POV, then diagnosis automatically becomes topical, doesn't it?
But ivy for last three days I have been looking for a comment on Saras's insistent 'observation'. Do you see an implication? Or a nonexistent, fanciful interpretation?😆

Have to close IF and concentrate on the tangibles, more later.😆
Edited by smrth - 12 years ago
happychappy thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#43

Originally posted by: arshicritic


True smrth, it is for the first time I am seeing the true nature of Kumud's wound. And must thank Ivy for the clarity with which she has brought it out. You both have that third eye that looks and divines thinks that are subtle and understated, and are often missed out.

An Aha post from you ivy, loved it and glad you fully recovered and back!


As usual, I read ivy's post, and thought I got a glimmer of light, then read Smrth's response, and feel that I didnt actually get the point at all...😊 So for the less enlightened, please clarify...

Does the fact that the line is blurred make it easier or more difficult for Kumud to leave?

I would imagine that if the line was well-defined and strengthened by being married to a different man, say the logical opposite of Pramad, it would be easier for Kumud to stay (within the line).

Now the non-existence or blurring of the line leaves her in a no-man's land of belonging nowhere and to none... But in the longer run, given that Kumud herself is not exactly un-urbane, would it not make it easier for her to leave (cross the line)

Why is the chasm between her conscience and her identity so unbridgeable? In the present day? Obviously, the chasm is a deep, rich lode of angst, but still?



-Ivy- thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#44

Originally posted by: happychappy


As usual, I read ivy's post, and thought I got a glimmer of light, then read Smrth's response, and feel that I didnt actually get the point at all...😊 So for the less enlightened, please clarify...

Does the fact that the line is blurred make it easier or more difficult for Kumud to leave?

I would imagine that if the line was well-defined and strengthened by being married to a different man, say the logical opposite of Pramad, it would be easier for Kumud to stay (within the line).

Now the non-existence or blurring of the line leaves her in a no-man's land of belonging nowhere and to none... But in the longer run, given that Kumud herself is not exactly un-urbane, would it not make it easier for her to leave (cross the line)

Why is the chasm between her conscience and her identity so unbridgeable? In the present day? Obviously, the chasm is a deep, rich lode of angst, but still?


Bold One: That is a trick question, my friend 😉 The way I see it, it doesn't matter if blurred or not, easy or difficult is not even going to come into the picture because, as long as there is a line, any line, that K can see or imagine, and God forbid, find that she can hold on to, she will stay. Of course, let's see how smrth Bhai reads this =)

Bold Two: Really, would it? Perhaps. But for how long? Imagine all constants the same, only nature of Pramad changed, but still with Saras in the picture, could K stay truly "within lines" in the most absolute essence of the word?

Bold Three: Million-dollar question, buddy. And so eloquently put by you 👏 Here we are trying to re-concile source and show. In the source that chasm was never bridged. But in show, core characteristics of Kumud have been altered. The chasm may not be so "unbridgeable", after all... Her conscience and her identity have gotten utterly enmeshed by this point. And paradoxically, this has created a gulf. On one hand, Kumud is torn apart within herself (gulf)... On the other, her identities of "Mrs. Dharmadhikari" and "Kumudsundari Desai" have become irrevocably entwined. With Saras there, these identities (both of whom she cannot let go) have provided fuel to the raging fire of her conscience. They are mutually in service of one another, and also working against the other. It is a catch-22 of a right, royal order! As you ask, "but still"... However, at this point of time in show, that's easier asked than answered 😕

Edited by IdiotViewer - 12 years ago
twila thumbnail
13th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 12 years ago
#45
Hey Ivy ...



Great to see you back , Dear ... Hope you are feeling fine now . 😊


and what can i say about your analysis ... Brriilliantt as always . 👏

you add so much depth to the episodes ... open our eyes to newer meanings and nuances ...and the writing so lyrical ... reading it is such a pleasure. 😊

happychappy thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#46

Originally posted by: IdiotViewer


Bold One: That is a trick question, my friend 😉 The way I see it, it doesn't matter if blurred or not, easy or difficult is not even going to come into the picture because, as long as there is a line, any line, that K can see or imagine, and God forbid, find that she can hold on to, she will stay. Of course, let's see how smrth Bhai reads this =)

Bold Two: Really, would it? Perhaps. But for how long? Imagine all constants the same, only nature of Pramad changed, but still with Saras in the picture, could K stay truly "within lines" in the most absolute essence of the word?

Bold Three: Million-dollar question, buddy. And so eloquently put by you 👏 Here we are trying to re-concile source and show. In the source that chasm was never bridged. But in show, core characteristics of Kumud have been altered. The chasm may not be so "unbridgeable", after all... Her conscience and her identity have gotten utterly enmeshed by this point. And paradoxically, this has created a gulf. On one hand, Kumud is torn apart within herself (gulf)... On the other, her identities of "Mrs. Dharmadhikari" and "Kumudsundari Desai" have become irrevocably entwined. With Saras there, these identities (both of whom she cannot let go) have provided fuel to the raging fire of her conscience. They are mutually in service of one another, and also working against the other. It is a catch-22 of a right, royal order! As you ask, "but still"... However, at this point of time in show, that's easier asked than answered 😕


Thanks... you do a pretty good job with the million-dollar ones, dear Ivy!
p.s. I've given up on manually altering your name... shall wait for you to do it. At source! 😊
smrth thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 12 years ago
#47

Originally posted by: IdiotViewer



Bold One: That is a trick question, my friend 😉 The way I see it, it doesn't matter if blurred or not, easy or difficult is not even going to come into the picture because, as long as there is a line, any line, that K can see or imagine, and God forbid, find that she can hold on to, she will stay. Of course, let's see how smrth Bhai reads this =)
Bold Two: Really, would it? Perhaps. But for how long? Imagine all constants the same, only nature of Pramad changed, but still with Saras in the picture, could K stay truly "within lines" in the most absolute essence of the word?

Bold Three: Million-dollar question, buddy. And so eloquently put by you 👏 Here we are trying to re-concile source and show. In the source that chasm was never bridged. But in show, core characteristics of Kumud have been altered. The chasm may not be so "unbridgeable", after all... Her conscience and her identity have gotten utterly enmeshed by this point. And paradoxically, this has created a gulf. On one hand, Kumud is torn apart within herself (gulf)... On the other, her identities of "Mrs. Dharmadhikari" and "Kumudsundari Desai" have become irrevocably entwined. With Saras there, these identities (both of whom she cannot let go) have provided fuel to the raging fire of her conscience. They are mutually in service of one another, and also working against the other. It is a catch-22 of a right, royal order! As you ask, "but still"... However, at this point of time in show, that's easier asked than answered




[/quote]

Again on dot, ivy ji. And it also dispels a slight doubt over reading/interpretation of your post. Happy ji this is more or less what I was trying to say. Adding;

@ red, any of forfeit (leave) is difficult for her. She asserts repeatedly, 'not one to give up relationship without giving her best'. So question of 'ease' as we see it, is moot as ivy explained. Moreover, the 'line' is both- imposed as well as, accepted.

@ blue, ivy ji you caught her vulnerability so perfectly. Actually, weak Pramad gives her a 'vicarious' respite. For here she has a pretext to counter her own 'conflict' well against. But were there a more straight Jeck, in the picture, she would have felt her conflict even more acutely and more violently against her own failing emotional self perhaps.

@ bold three and chasm; though book has just outlined how she was failing under the weight, here perhaps we have to wait to see the adaptation. But if they are continuing any conformity to the original than the course is not accounting any 'bridge' I am afraid.
Her nature says, 'give utmost.' Her integrity demands best towards it. But her 'consciousness' is not giving up the 'etching' that she also 'adopted' priorly, wholeheartedly and loyally. It's a conflict between, conscience and consciousness.🤢
Edited by smrth - 12 years ago

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".