Strange Episode to say the least:Mod's Note PG10 - Page 7

Originally posted by: reguser

Suchitra, it is true that life goes on.... but, the present Ragini mourns over Sadi's death in the begining of each episode. What was shown in yesterday's episode (havent seen, just assuming by reading) was mainly to show why/how Ranvir's exit from Ragini's life. And while portraying this, they completely forgot what they are showing after the leap. This is like a specialist (MD holder) treating the organs of human body forgetting the other parts. The medicine he gives to the patient may cure the problems of that particular part but it may cause trouble to other 😆

Also, I feel not a good way to end Ragvir story. Or may be we come to know more in later episodes.😕

I always expected a good message from this show. But, now I feel the message is "Keep your brain in the fridge and enjoy what you see dude..." 😆

Originally posted by: --Anu--

What they show at the beginning is just a recap. There is no doubt Ragini still misses her sister badly but she can't stop living because of that. There is a big difference. And the udaasi in Ragini's life is due to Ranveer's death and her marriage to Anmol.

Originally posted by: reguser

Just a recap of the present and not the past? Yes, Ragini cant stop living because of Sadi's death. No doubt. But, given Ragini's character, it is totally unlike of her to come out of the sadness of her sister's death within months and to go into fun mode. That too when Ragini knew her sister took her bura-naseeb. Ragini's udassi is because of Ranvir and Sadhna both, who are most dearest to her.

It is just to show how and why Ranvir exited from her life.

How can we expect logic? Alekh (before leap) was 25 years (he himself wrote in an appln). Naveen is supposed to be younger than him. Lets say 24. Now Guni is 18 and Navin will be 24+6=30. So what is the age difference between Navin and his daughter? 12 years 😆

Originally posted by: --Anu--

So true. Not only that they were really talking about their Anmol-Anamika days, not about the character Anmol. It was kind of confusing but the dialogues were meant for the future storyline. Their conversation started with Anmol but Ranveer was just teasing her with the name she gave him not about some other guy. He just meant to say that she fell for Anmol (basically Ranveer) but Ranveer came in between them i.e Ragini's Anmol aka Ranveer and Ragini.

Originally posted by: reguser

Is it? Was Ranvir talking about Anmol (who is Ranvir himself)? Then atleast ok, Otherwise, I was thinking they will not apply any logic there also.

Originally posted by: ~*simran*~

I would like to disagree with this part ji. Life goes on after someone passing away. Within a year is a long time, and a couple romancing is by no means unacceptable. In reality when a very close family member passes away, it is indeed very difficult to live life. However, we do live life ji. In b/w we do have some light moments. Close to a year things resume to normal, and within a year normacly to life happens again ji.

It is very normal for any couple to have lighthearted romance within a year of passing of a death in the family. Safhna was very close and dear, but life resumes. Why is it not acceptable? If it is within a few days then yes, I agree it's not acceptable. But then again, it's their lives so I don't care. However, if it is after a few months (say 6-7) then I really see no problem.

A year is very long, and a loss of a close one stays with you forever (personal experience). However, life goes on no matter what ji. Romancing is natural b/w couples, and by no means is it disrespectful to the deceased; especially if it is within a year (ie few months or longer). When someone passes, it gets really hard and a smile does make you feel guilty (again personal experience). However, we do laugh, we do live, we do come to terms with it.

Anyways, I see no reason why a married couple cannot romance if the passing away happened to almost a year ji. As far as my math goes, it is a 8 year leap and Anmol has been married to Ragini 6 years then there is a year somewhere. Chalo, jo bhi hai mera point of view is the same. I have lost someone who was for me a part of my soul. It took me a very long time for myself to come to terms with it than people around me took. One needs to accomodate in life, no matter how hard it is. There were days when I would laugh and be happy, and after a bit feel so guilty why did I laugh etc. However, it is life and as humans we have been functioned to live it. That is why I do not see a couple romancing acceptable. If it is just 2 months into it then yeah I do not, but I give the benefit of doubt that it may be more like 6-8 months into it-something I see no bad in.

This is just my POV, not intended to hurt anyone. I am actually very afraid of posting in this section lol. You may fully disagree with me, but I may not get the time to carry forward an engaging discussion ji😊. I need to go to my patients.

Originally posted by: shanti05

Hey great points the highlighted ones is what i feel also

If Anmol even met Ranveer after 6 months of Sadhana's death he has to live his life with happiness and can't be mouring
So also goes with Ragini since she wud have to mom both Tammana and Kushi and with all the support from kith and kin and family life goes on
To make Alek also be happy with the mental balance he lost is what the whole family was doing at that time when Anmol met ranveer

After watching the FB portion I thought and realised

ONE THING IS CLEAR FROM THE CONVERSATION OF RANVIR AND RAGINI ANMOL HAS MET RANVIR EVEN BEFORE RAGINI GOT PREGNANT !! COZ during their conversation neither Ranvir mentioned abt his and Ragini's daughter he just mentioned pyaar ka nasha and abt his wife Ragini

So Ranveer might be knowing Anmol a year or 6 months before Ragini got pregnant second time

So maybe Ranvir knows Anmol even just after Ragini and Ranveer got married !!!!

I think the whole thing does make complete sense
So mouring ios no where in the picture or Sadana'sw death !!!

Originally posted by: Purehearts

This is exactly what I thought too.
I also observed that Raagini was wearing that saree before her second pregnancy was know, around or just before Sadhana's pregnancy.
Yes neither Ranveer or Raagini mentioned Tammy .
But you never know, Cts might not be thinking keenly like us.
We have Bidaai story running in our head.But Cts are just adding scene by scene and creating it.
They might have entirely have missed to care for this detail.
Let see what's going to happen in today's episode.