Strange Episode to say the least:Mod's Note PG10

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Veritas

@Veritas

Dazzler

Posted: 15 years ago

#41

Originally posted by: SPN_JD_Addicted
Ragini as per Bidaai never had any identity.Others decide for her,her husband tramples over her and her MIL just bulldozes her.We really can't blame her here.She just fulfilled her husband's dying wish.May be they married quickly cos Ranvir wanted to witness it lol

then the marriage wont be legal..unless Ranvir divorced her first..

Quote

smitha

@SPN_JD_Addicted

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 15 years ago

#42

Originally posted by: Veritas

then the marriage wont be legal..unless Ranvir divorced her first..

And I sincerely hope we don't get to witness that! 🥱

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Priya_aks

@priya_sparsha

Rocker

+ 2

Posted: 15 years ago

#43

Originally posted by: Veritas

then the marriage wont be legal..unless Ranvir divorced her first..

sometimes we have keep our practical thinking aside while watching tv shows😆

Quote

smitha

@SPN_JD_Addicted

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 15 years ago

#44

Originally posted by: priya_sparsha

sometimes we have keep our practical thinking aside while watching tv shows😆

It might turn into an emotional scene.Ranvir on his death bed,giving away Ragini!!!!I feel the beginnings of a migraine lol.

Hope we get to see some closure on this ASAP

Quote

Veritas

@Veritas

Dazzler

Posted: 15 years ago

#45

Originally posted by: SPN_JD_Addicted

It might turn into an emotional scene.Ranvir on his death bed,giving away Ragini!!!!I feel the beginnings of a migraine lol.

Hope we get to see some closure on this ASAP

STOP you are making me Puke...
I will personally go and beat someone up if they show this....

Quote

479445

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#46

Originally posted by: priya_sparsha

agree. One doesnt always have to be sad for missing loved ones. Afterall, loved ones live in heart even if they are not physically with us. Every relationship and everyone moves on one day or another.

Even if I spare the thought that within months it all moved along (again, doesnt compute as they were supposed to be each other's soul) it just doesnt match to their personalities ... Along with the timing of it all ... Khushi-Tammy complexities ... the shock and desolation ... ... ... just doesnt gel in ... not in accordance ... also considering Alekh's gone looney!
Sadhna and Ragini were supposed to have a special benchmark relationship ... and Alekh and Ranvir too ...

Well to some it may have looked ordinary ... to me and to people around me, plus according to the personalities of the characters ... it was eerie.

Who knows what else is coming up ... GEAR URSELVES ... LOLLLLLLLL

As for Gunni ... think then if Gunni was 10 ... Naveen should be 30 atleast? ... or if he was 25 (which means he married at 15 years of age right?) , perhaps an early marriage ... perhaps Avni and he had some intimacy in their teens (did not get proper reproductive education) due to which they had to marry early?.... so many things can happen ... and we know they'r evil

Edited by Ice-Thinker - 15 years ago

Quote

smitha

@SPN_JD_Addicted

Sparkler

+ 2

Posted: 15 years ago

#47

Originally posted by: Veritas

STOP you are making me Puke...
I will personally go and beat someone up if they show this....

Smita,JUST IMAGINE......leaving it to ur imagination! 🤣

Quote

gilmores

@gilmores

Stunner

+ 8

Posted: 15 years ago

#48

It was a bad episode. Period. Bad flashback-only good thing was seeing Kinshuk/Ranvir again.

Even if Kinshuk himself decided to quit and Ranvir was supposed to be a part of the leap, the DT's job is to come up with a convincing end for Ranvir and Ragvir. And they get a BIG, FAT 0 for it. Epic Fail.

Quote

15836

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#49

Originally posted by: Omshanti1111
Ranveer's proposal, his doings and ragini;'s marriage all are acceptable...except that 'teasing and romancing" as if nothing had happened (Sadhna's death) is not acceptable... how can both revert back to so much teasing and romancing within a year of Sadhna's loss

I would like to disagree with this part ji. Life goes on after someone passing away. Within a year is a long time, and a couple romancing is by no means unacceptable. In reality when a very close family member passes away, it is indeed very difficult to live life. However, we do live life ji. In b/w we do have some light moments. Close to a year things resume to normal, and within a year normacly to life happens again ji.

It is very normal for any couple to have lighthearted romance within a year of passing of a death in the family. Safhna was very close and dear, but life resumes. Why is it not acceptable? If it is within a few days then yes, I agree it's not acceptable. But then again, it's their lives so I don't care. However, if it is after a few months (say 6-7) then I really see no problem. A year is very long, and a loss of a close one stays with you forever (personal experience). However, life goes on no matter what ji. Romancing is natural b/w couples, and by no means is it disrespectful to the deceased; especially if it is within a year (ie few months or longer). When someone passes, it gets really hard and a smile does make you feel guilty (again personal experience). However, we do laugh, we do live, we do come to terms with it.

Anyways, I see no reason why a married couple cannot romance if the passing away happened to almost a year ji. As far as my math goes, it is a 8 year leap and Anmol has been married to Ragini 6 years then there is a year somewhere. Chalo, jo bhi hai mera point of view is the same. I have lost someone who was for me a part of my soul. It took me a very long time for myself to come to terms with it than people around me took. One needs to accomodate in life, no matter how hard it is. There were days when I would laugh and be happy, and after a bit feel so guilty why did I laugh etc. However, it is life and as humans we have been functioned to live it. That is why I do not see a couple romancing acceptable. If it is just 2 months into it then yeah I do not, but I give the benefit of doubt that it may be more like 6-8 months into it-something I see no bad in.

This is just my POV, not intended to hurt anyone. I am actually very afraid of posting in this section lol. You may fully disagree with me, but I may not get the time to carry forward an engaging discussion ji😊. I need to go to my patients.

Quote

apus fan

@sami01

Sparkler

+ 5

Posted: 15 years ago

#50

simran ur view is right, in real life people sometimes laugh even after 2 months or so , i have seen my close friends laughing after such event, life has to go on......i think here those flash backs were not of a day but of series of months may be creatives needed to do better editing , but i must admit all i saw today was apu😉......

and yes yahana post karne se pehle sochna padta hai but koi na is forum pe bhi wo din aayenge jab hum fiction ko sirf fiction samjhenge....