Bakwas Episode:Mod's note PG17 - Page 9

Originally posted by: vishmewell

That makes her a bad person. Not a bad mother. A bad mother is someone who would kill her own child(ren).

There's a difference between a mother person and a bad mother.

sadi gonna burn I know i shoudlnt be happy

Originally posted by: reguser

After reading everything, I thought of seeing the serial (after so many days).

Well, it is not that bad but it is not that good also. 50-50 😆

What I didnt like:

1. Ranvir's actions. Ranvir is the one and only sensible guy in the whole lot. So why did he behave like this? No answer.

2. Sadhna has to prove her worth like this. Otherwise, Vasu cant understand. To prove Sadhna's worth, CTs will push her into fire. This is something horrible. Because, I dont consider there is anything to prove to Vasu. I wanted Vasu to realize slowly with time.

Things I liked:

1. Finally, there is end to this Vasu's hatred. Really frustrated with this.

Questions:

1. Sadhna once saved Alekh by taking bullets. I think Vasu remembers this. Still she hates Sadhna. Now Sadhna is saving Vasu and may be Vasu will start liking/understanding her. How is that possible? Or what does it mean? Does it mean that she loves herself more than her children?

I would have liked to see Sadhana entiring the burning house thinking Aalekh was there... Instead of holding 2 men, I would have liked them to stop blood circulation of Vasu and Ranvir.😆There is no bigger shock and torture for a mother not being able to save her son. Sadhana andar jaathi aur donon wapas baarar athe, aur Vasu is gratified and baat khatam in a nice way...

Originally posted by: vishmewell

@ red - In pure legal terms, Any act(s) performed during contract period is considered services.
Any product developed, or services provided are considered proprietaries of the the person or entity you are providing services to. She got paid upfront for services, she chose to end the contract for a decent severance package.

This is not something I am saying. This contract Law. If I am a prosecutor this is what I am going to argue... there is evidence that she did not exercise other options. Knowingly ans willingly she lost the competition.

Does defense hold any water with my evidence and witnesses?

I am here... Convince me based on any sciences. I will take it. It's hard for me to accept emotional arguments. 😳
😳

Originally posted by: reguser

Yes, I agree with you here.

But do u know something, when she was crying inside that house calling Ranvir, what came to my mind?

Sadhna is also somebody's daughter and how much she has played with her emotions. So Sadhna's mother will not feel bad is it? Did Vasu think like this?

Now please dont tell me that Sadhna should have thought about this.

Honestly, I agree with you. But in reality, women are like that.. there is always a difference between mine and thine...

Most people don't appreciate their MILs... of course its called MIL syndrome 😆😆

Originally posted by: KiNnY-pArTnEr

sadi gonna burn I know i shoudlnt be happy

but vasu gona learn a lessoon

and she is gona underatand sadi...goodness😉

i want to sadi to become very serious😉

Originally posted by: reguser

@Bold - Then you will not be convinced seeing Bidai. Because you need to be emotional to understand a character like Sadhna. Now dont tell me that I am very attached to characters in fiction etc. But, to understand a character like Sadhna you can not rely on science, logic, law and judgement. She is emotional and her intentions are always good. You are commenting her intentions and that is not correct.

Never her intentions... I comment on her actions and decision making abilities. Anything in excess is harmful. One must strike a balance between emotions and practicality.

Originally posted by: vishmewell

Never her intentions... I comment on her actions and decision making abilities. Anything in excess is harmful. One must strike a balance between emotions and practicality.

Originally posted by: reguser

The problem is what you are thinking as "sach" is not so for me as well as many others.

I can draw conclusion from your way of putting Mahabharath here is that, Sadhna supported Vasu (in my case the real she Duryodhan) and hence suffering like Bheeshma.

Tell me Vish, even when our husbands are not well (or when we are not well), we (or they) take care of them with love. Are we (or they) called as nurse? I am not blind to see the love and affection showed by Sadhna at that time.

To conclude I only tell you one thing. You are against a good person (Sadhna/Bheeshma) who is supporting a wrong person (Vasu/Duryodhana). I didnt want to drag Bheeshma and Duryodhan here, you only dragged them so I am giving your examples only.

Areee yaar,.... this story is not only Ramayan it has become Mahabharath also.

I am not against a person. I am ONLY against certain acts... Let me make that cleat the zillionth time yaar...

In mercy killing intentions are good and the person executing might be very good at heart and cant see the suffering of a terminally ill patient, does that make that act or the person right? No. Act is still considered gruesome murder. So, it is the act that is condemned. Since every act is associated with a person, the person is convicted.

I am not using Ramayan or mahabharat for a ficticious character. I want to clarify that. I am defending my decision as a real person based on Giita.
There is difference between fictitious and real.

Originally posted by: reguser

After reading everything, I thought of seeing the serial (after so many days).

Well, it is not that bad but it is not that good also. 50-50 😆

What I didnt like:

1. Ranvir's actions. Ranvir is the one and only sensible guy in the whole lot. So why did he behave like this? No answer.

2. Sadhna has to prove her worth like this. Otherwise, Vasu cant understand. To prove Sadhna's worth, CTs will push her into fire. This is something horrible. Because, I dont consider there is anything to prove to Vasu. I wanted Vasu to realize slowly with time.

Things I liked:

1. Finally, there is end to this Vasu's hatred. Really frustrated with this.

Questions:

1. Sadhna once saved Alekh by taking bullets. I think Vasu remembers this. Still she hates Sadhna. Now Sadhna is saving Vasu and may be Vasu will start liking/understanding her. How is that possible? Or what does it mean? Does it mean that she loves herself more than her children?

If I remember correctly, Sadhana didn't save Alekh by taking the bullets. The shot was misfired by the goon and the bullet just hit Sadhana instead of Alekh.