Reality shows with public voting are
popularity contests, nothing more, nothing less.
They capture not only how much public support is out there for a contestant, in terms of number of people, but how strongly the fanbase supports that contestant (i.e. how strongly they vote).
The voting results, as far as I can tell, are a combination of several factors:
-viewer sentiment for contestant's backstory, hometown, personality, looks, etc. People love a good underdog story-it just depends on who they see as the underdog.
-attachment level - even if some contestant's have a performance that is not up to their usual ability, if a contestant is able to keep fans rooting for them through thick and thin, something has made a mark - whether it be how much that contestant's singing is adored in general, things based on viewer sentiment, or a combination of both.
-how things are hyped on the show (e.g. HR and his comments for Aneek vs. his comments for Raja)
-which in turn affects how aggressive the mobilization and/or general voting strategy is across each fanbase, and this changes weekly. If a certain aspect is hyped more than everything else (e.g. Aneek vs. Raja), viewers on both sides of the controversy get worried that the other side is getting votes they shouldn't be getting based on viewer sentiment. They get worried their favorite will get voted out unfairly because of this, it is only human nature....many fans on both sides probably start voting more aggressively than they already were. Things of that nature.
-that week's performances (interpretation of which is influenced by judges comments, but is still highly subjective and open to viewer interpretation and biases)
-accessibility of voting/television in areas where a contestant may have stronger support or stronger chance of getting it, based on viewer sentiment.
-girls as a whole get less votes than boys and get eliminated out sooner. Which is partly a problem with the audience's voting tendencies. The other part goes back to the issue of the way things are hyped on the show, and how that plays on voter tendencies.
-Zee perhaps doing fuzzy maths with the voting, losing votes here, finding votes there, to suit their purposes. Even with this
potential voter fraud, though, I suspect there still have to be enough votes coming in all along for all the top 5 to have made it that far, in order for fuzzy margins not to have gotten them out earlier, and in order for Zee to even want to keep these contestants around. It is not in Zee's financial interests to have kept any of the top five in the running that long if they were not generating enough audience interest.
There are some other factors, too, but those are the biggies.
Edited by mojazwal - 17 years ago