SRGMP Challenge 6th round results - Page 8

Originally posted by: TrubL

I think the judges should be fired. Once the verdict is in, it cannot be changed.

These are the same judges who chose Musaed,P & urmi and Swastika..you mean they were wrong...

please lets give them credit for their time and choices...lets think practically and with a cool head...😊

Originally posted by: adi_0112

These are the same judges who chose Musaed,P & urmi and Swastika..you mean they were wrong...

Adi - Urmi and Swastika are the same person 😆

Sorry folks - I thought we needed a little change in mood here - everyone seems to be tensed 😳

Originally posted by: Awww

in one episode Hema and Nihira both were not eliminated coz they scored same, than I think Judges should have done that, saying Sunitha was as good as the top three therefore will only eliminate one contestant instead of two.😕

I agree Zee - but we have seen in EMET too that the judges had the veto power to bring a pair back.. and in fact they were given an additional veto power too when it was thought that more than one pair deserved it, and if we remember both the pairs that got veto power finally did not win it.. finally it was the deserving jodi... its just about giving a fair chance to someone whom the learned judges think have the potential... 😊

Originally posted by: shadyhtown

Adi - Urmi and Swastika are the same person 😆

Sorry folks - I thought we needed a little change in mood here - everyone seems to be tensed 😳

😆

Shady I was few days back going through the old threads and found the thread where Angela gave songs to the participants. And becuase of the ID's she was unable to tell who should get male voice and who female....

That thread was really funny........

but none of us liked it, did we? jaya I think in principal whatever decision has made we should respect it. Whole thing is rules of the game should not be changed in between the games.

How much we liked public voting, tell me, this seems like that to me now. We were given chance to put our opinion before making the decision.

I said Yes initially but I felt I made the mistake after reading sur ji post & my opinion is we should not change rules now.

Originally posted by: jayc1234

I agree Zee - but we have seen in EMET too that the judges had the veto power to bring a pair back.. and in fact they were given an additional veto power too when it was thought that more than one pair deserved it, and if we remember both the pairs that got veto power finally did not win it.. finally it was the deserving jodi... its just about giving a fair chance to someone whom the learned judges think have the potential... 😊

Originally posted by: manjujain

but none of us liked it, did we? jaya I think in principal whatever decision has made we should respect it. Whole thing is rules of the game should not be changed in between the games.

How much we liked public voting, tell me, this seems like that to me now. We were given chance to put our opinion before making the decision.

I said Yes initially but I felt I made the mistake after reading sur ji post & my opinion is we should not change rules now.

This is nt a matter of rules and regulations. it is just a point tht has been raised by the judge and we want yur views. but it is also true tht finally it will be the mentors and the contestants who will hav the last say in this matter.

Manjudi,

Cannot the judges use their veto power if they feel it..here they are the ones who told..as we see from bhaskar bhai's post that she should be given a wild card entry...

no mentor,member or anyone told them to tell so..it is their preference..cannot we as audience,mentors,participants accept that??

hasn't this happened before when one did not get eliminated because judges felt he/she deserved a chance..??

Shady if swastika is urmi..then who is the fourth one???

Originally posted by: manjujain

but none of us liked it, did we? jaya I think in principal whatever decision has made we should respect it. Whole thing is rules of the game should not be changed in between the games.

How much we liked public voting, tell me, this seems like that to me now. We were given chance to put our opinion before making the decision.

I said Yes initially but I felt I made the mistake after reading sur ji post & my opinion is we should not change rules now.

Yes didi - a decision has been made... But its the same decision makers who are feeling now that someone should be given a chance.. Yes they thought that 3 others were better than her in this round, but they also feel that she was brilliant from the very beginning.. Its their opinion didi, and all the Mods are asking us is whether we support their opinion or not.. When Ummm got eliminated in the early stages of the competition just because of some personal reasons, did yalgaar gharana get a replacement contestant - No! was that being fair to the team then?

Moving on, I just feel that judges asked for our opinion and we are expressing it here. The rest will ofcourse be decided by the majority, mentors, participants, mods and eventually and most importantly by the judges!

Originally posted by: adi_0112

Shady if swastika is urmi..then who is the fourth one???

Adi - We had only 5 singers in this round - Urmi (Swastika), Musaed, and Pradarshak, Sunitha and T.