so unfair poor twinkle and vishwas - Page 2

sharib and banjo are far better than tv for sure. bs can sing any song and still maitain the quality but tv cannot sing all of the songs well, specially twinkle.

sharib se acha koi nahin twinkle bhi nahin

Koi farak nahi parta...public ne TV ko shayad vote nahi kiya hova...Ab kuch nahi kar sakte...

(to be honest...I never liked T.V) 😆

Twinkle is better off without this contest. She is too old for it and could use
this time to do other things to further her career.

Vishwas, I think his time has passed. He is too ld and not good enough.
Sometimes I feel that way about Niladri too even though I like him as a
singer. How old is Saptak?

The veto was now or never as they could not use it in the finals.

GUYZ BASICLY I POSTED DIS TOPIC SO DAHT EVRY1 CAN WISH THM ALL DA BEST NOT SAYING THR BAD..AND MY INTENTION WASNT TO FIGHT AND I AM NOT SYAING ANYHTING ABOUT sharib so y som ppl getting aharib in2 dis?..i didn say anything against him he is my second favourite so why would i anywayz i dont wana argue anymore evrybody has thr own opinion.. 😊

Originally posted by: mdroy

Twinkle is better off without this contest. She is too old for it and could use
this time to do other things to further her career.

Vishwas, I think his time has passed. He is too ld and not good enough.
Sometimes I feel that way about Niladri too even though I like him as a
singer. How old is Saptak?

The veto was now or never as they could not use it in the finals.

Is there an age limit in this contest?

The age of all the participants is given in the sify website. (Check the Challenge 2005 section)

And would you believe it:

Rajeev Kumar - 29 years (in 2005)

Sharib Sabri - 17 years (in 2005)

Raktima Mukherjee - 25 years (in 2005)

Twinkle Bajpai - 20 years (in 2005)

Ujjaini Mukherjee (one more?) - 17 years (in 2005)

So how does that make Twinkle "Too Old" for this contest? She is below the average age very clearly.

If at all, it is Rajeev, who is the oldest of the lot (and clearly the most mediocre) who shouldnt be here!

Twinkle was arrogant so GG was correct to throw TV out of EMET...

Originally posted by: sujay1974

Twinkle was arrogant so GG was correct to throw TV out of EMET...

First of all, it wasnt GG who threw them out of EMET. It was the fact that they fell short of votes (shall I say "Sympathy votes")

And secondly, you say - Twinkle was arrogant so GG was correct to throw TV out of EMET...

Since when did EMET become a "good behaviour" contest - I always thought it was a music contest!

Originally posted by: desi_gr3l

GUYZ BASICLY I POSTED DIS TOPIC SO DAHT EVRY1 CAN WISH THM ALL DA BEST NOT SAYING THR BAD..AND MY INTENTION WASNT TO FIGHT AND I AM NOT SYAING ANYHTING ABOUT sharib so y som ppl getting aharib in2 dis?..i didn say anything against him he is my second favourite so why would i anywayz i dont wana argue anymore evrybody has thr own opinion.. 😊

Its because of the subject of your post...

Originally posted by: dewan_arun

First of all, it wasnt GG who threw them out of EMET. It was the fact that they fell short of votes (shall I say "Sympathy votes")

And secondly, you say - Twinkle was arrogant so GG was correct to throw TV out of EMET...

Since when did EMET become a "good behaviour" contest - I always thought it was a music contest!

It is definitely a music contest...but if anyone is so arrogant to say that she should not have taken part in the contset...then yes, she deserved to be thrown out the contset (irrespective of whether she sings well or not) and GG has done just that by not using the veto. It is to be remembered always that however big one is...he/she cannot be bigger than the institution he/she belongs to...