Salman Khan behind bars - breaking news ! - Page 13

Originally posted by: seema_17

Truly sorry Seemaji but you are saying that your clique of distinguished lawyers do not find anything wrong in your stance that if a group of criminals committed a crime and one was caught - then we must "wait" until all of them are caught before we punish the one that is caught???

Else let the one that was caught go away scot-free until the others were caught ?????

And if "ALL" weren't caught then punish none???? So you are saying Law should be a "All or none" deal???

Originally posted by: seema_17

Respectji,

u keep saying we shld look at this from a legal perspetive, and yet u r the one going into his background, with the kind of company he keeps, his age and what not. and it is ur opinion that he might kill others. how do u kno? u have kept on saying that we shld look at things from legal point of view, so do U keep reverting back and forth from legal to a not so legal perspective as it is convenient for you? or do u believe that only u have the right to do that? as for me i will stick to my stance and say let them all go in together. do u think they will do anything after he is sentenced? the answer is NO. becuz we r the kind of ppl who will say oh atleast one of them got caught and we have done our duty and just sit back... so once salman is in forget abt the conviction of others

No I am just saying, once we convict someone(and it is soooooo hard to do that in India) that person should serve time. We should not deviate from convicting whoever is guilty, but if by chance, we get an opportunity to convict someone who has been in rackeetering, anti-country activities, extortion in a crime of killing rare animals, good let us have him serve time

You should watch Untouchables and see the mafia related trials in the US, yes those guys were all convicted in unrelated activities, but it served a greater purpose in reducing Mafia activity. India as a country needs to really start focussing on that aspect of legal dawpech

And I am not saying this only for SK, this should be for all big/small criminals, that is the only way this out-of-control legal problem is reduced to a acceptable level

Originally posted by: seema_17

Respectji,

u keep saying we shld look at this from a legal perspetive, and yet u r the one going into his background, with the kind of company he keeps, his age and what not. and it is ur opinion that he might kill others. how do u kno? u have kept on saying that we shld look at things from legal point of view, so do U keep reverting back and forth from legal to a not so legal perspective as it is convenient for you? or do u believe that only u have the right to do that? as for me i will stick to my stance and say let them all go in together. do u think they will do anything after he is sentenced? the answer is NO. becuz we r the kind of ppl who will say oh atleast one of them got caught and we have done our duty and just sit back... so once salman is in forget abt the conviction of others

Oh - since "they" will do nothing after he is sentenced - then the best thing to do is not to catch him at all ??? So - taking a broader view - you are stating that since the Law isn't going to mete any punishment to high-profile criminals let us not even bother catching them???

Seemaji - we are at very acute cross-roads in our thought processes. Hence I bid you adieu and good luck with those law exams you said you had to prepare for !

Originally posted by: respect123

Truly sorry Seemaji but you are saying that your clique of distinguished lawyers do not find anything wrong in your stance that if a group of criminals committed a crime and one was caught - then we must "wait" until all of them are caught before we punish the one that is caught???

Else let the one that was caught go away scot-free until the others were caught ?????

And if "ALL" weren't caught then punish none???? So you are saying Law should be a "All or none" deal???

I am hardly going upto the law and telling it what it shld or shldn't do.... law doen't work on mine or ur singular opinion.

as for ur sarcasm abt my "clique of distinguished lawyers" i would say i haven't seen u trying to justify ur opinion with anything except for reason.

as for them finding anything wrong with my reasoning, i think u misunderstood becuz i meant that they believe and agree that law and morality r not different. and that law depends on morality, and law's roots are from morality. if u have any doubts u can find a lawyer who u feel is "distinguished" enough for u to confirm this issue with.

i never said let him go scott-free.... a delay and going scott-free are not the same, or r they according to u??

Originally posted by: respect123

Truly sorry Seemaji but you are saying that your clique of distinguished lawyers do not find anything wrong in your stance that if a group of criminals committed a crime and one was caught - then we must "wait" until all of them are caught before we punish the one that is caught???

Else let the one that was caught go away scot-free until the others were caught ?????

And if "ALL" weren't caught then punish none???? So you are saying Law should be a "All or none" deal???

Respectji,

I do not know about law, but Yes if everybody is involved in same crime then all should be punished at the same time. Here nobody else had been punished all gone scott free. There should not be selective justice. It is plain and simple if you do same thing with your kids, the kid who got punished will definitely feel depressed and dejected when other of his/her sibling got unpunished for the same crime. You can not say your kid I am punishing you now and I will punish other after one month for the same mistake.

Originally posted by: SmarterDesiKid

This topic should be closed. It has NOTHING to do with saregamapa! 😡
I still can't belive that a mod responded to this, when he/she know's it has nothing to do w/ saregamapa 😕

i am back and i have skimmed through....i am enjoying this discussion very much. stimulating conversation for a change. wish i had enough time to respond thoughtfully. i can say this much. i am 100% against death penalty. as for the initial topic of SK, i am really at a loss right now. i cannot imagine the guy with the kabootar buddy in maine pyar kiya doing all this 😆 now i know what he meant by kabootar ja ja ja 🤢

i think it has to do w/ srgmp, too. Salman khan was on the show.

Originally posted by: respect123

Oh - since "they" will do nothing after he is sentenced - then the best thing to do is not to catch him at all ??? So - taking a broader view - you are stating that since the Law isn't going to mete any punishment to high-profile criminals let us not even bother catching them???

Seemaji - we are at very acute cross-roads in our thought processes. Hence I bid you adieu and good luck with those law exams you said you had to prepare for !

i never said they would not do anything cuz they r high-profile people. u constantly misread my comments. since they have not caught anyone yet they r all working hard to convict atleast someone. their point of view is atleast someone has to pay. by keeping salman on hold we r pressuring the system to convict all of them.

and abt my "exams". i never said i had any. i said i have an english essay. as i said u r constantly misreading my posts. if u would read them more carefully next time, there wouldn't be so much confusion, and i wouldn't have to clarify myself again and again, and hence i would have more time for my english essay

This really has nothing to do with our discussion on hand and I apologize if I sound high-handed but it is "scot-free" not "scott-free".

Originally posted by: respect123

This really has nothing to do with our discussion on hand and I apologize if I sound high-handed but it is "scot-free" not "scott-free".

thank you respect ji,

i didn't know we were also supposed to use correct english over here otherwise i would also have corrected u when u said Gawd, instead of god

Originally posted by: respect123

This really has nothing to do with our discussion on hand and I apologize if I sound high-handed but it is "scot-free" not "scott-free".

respectji,

Jo bhi ho par hai to free na... free mein kisi ko nahin chhorne ka... sab ko pakar kar jail mein daalo...I think Salman is punished because he asked the judge to punish him instead of calling for hearing every time.