disgusting delhi show my opinion - Page 2

Originally posted by: simtara

Pehle to...autmother, aap do baar chatbuster ka naam galat copy kar gaye. Sorry, but it's started to bug me a lot since it happens so often with me. But that's not important.

Autmother...your post was opinion based. I wish, as appaji had also requested, you'd provided details of the show to back up your thoughts. Those of us who haven't had a chance to see it yet do not have a base off of which we can compare and then agree or disagree.

As Chatbuster mentioned, live shows often tend to be more about the hype, the atmosphere and actually seeing the performer, and less about the show (singing, etc) itself. Had it been a play, I would have said otherwise. But in this case, I will have to agree with Chatbuster.

Pradip...I didn't understand your comment about HR and Ranchi. Perhaps it's due to the fact that I no longer live in India, and am therefore removed from regional prejudices. Care to explain?

Hi simtara ji,

Nice Avatar😉. Ranchi is famous for its Mental Asylum, and thats what Pradip ji meant.

Just watched the Delhi episode online. I have only one thing to say "VINIT YOU ARE SCREWED". Once this show is telecasted you will loose lot of votes. You were just no match for Debojit.

Look (and this is not to point fingers at you, it's just that you too are bringing it up and I am participating in this thread), obviously those who made it into this show are capable of singing.
You may not like Vinit's style of singing. Fine. I didn't particularly like Rajeev's. We all have our preference in that. But it doesn't mean we go about claiming or declaring that the rest aren't singers (just because we don't like them).
As far as the hypothetical situation... Yes, obviously it would have been different. Each individiual brings a unique dynamic with himself or herself. The three you mentioned are well versed in the classical forms of singing as well. While the assumption that they would have chosen to sing within their comfort zone is valid, it is equally possible that at this stage they would also have been interested in or comfortable enough to explore less familiar areas.
Trust me when I say that there would have been an equal amount of hype if any two of the three contestants you mentioned had been on stage instead. The difference would have been in the reason for the hype and mania.
I'll go as far as to give a hypothetical reason. These contestants are all relatively young. With youth comes energy and a different form of passion. The crowd feeds off this energy, and in return supplies energy for the performers.