My idea of a better scoring and voting system

SCORING SYTSEM:

well since the judges want to use terms like hit or super hit.. they can have a more varies scroing system comprising box office terms like:

disaster
flop
below average
average
above average
semi hit
hit
superhit
blockbuster
alltime blockbuster.

see, a perfect scale on 1 to 0.. or they can be mature and actually use 1 - 10!!!

VOTING SYSTEM:

either they can have it similar to the chote ustaad one,

or they can have the current voice of india voting system,

the judges decide the bottom 4 and the audience decides who to save..


NOTE:

THE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ABOVE 2 SYSTEMS WILL ONLY AND I MEAN ONLY WORK IF
the judges judge properly..

they cant score on the basis of:

specialness of dabba
alien langueage to asma
sweetness of asma..

most probably shankar and aadesh will buck up.. maybe pritam.. he did well in ustaad when he had to score for elimination decision.. maybe himesh too but i havent seen him judge foer making the decision in a show b4..

SO WHAT DO U THINK??

NOTE:
I DO REALISE THAT THE PRODUCTION HOUSE WILL NOT ALLOW ME TO PUT THE 2ND VOTING SYSTEM COZ IT MEANS LESS VOING MOOLAH!

Well Joe, if the judges were judging properly in the first place the idiotic current system would also work. No matter what the system --- the first rule is that judges have to be impartial and judge fairly and give actual judgments without bias.

Your scoring system is good, but I feel that giving the judges so many choices only makes matter worse --- none of them give an honest judgment.

The second voting system I like --- the judges picking the bottom four --- that might actually work. But like you said --- gotta have proper judgment first and foremost.

Good topic! 👍🏼

P.S. Not liking your sig.

Originally posted by: *Woh Ajnabee*

Well Joe, if the judges were judging properly in the first place the idiotic current system would also work. No matter what the system --- the first rule is that judges have to be impartial and judge fairly and give actual judgments without bias.

Your scoring system is good, but I feel that giving the judges so many choices only makes matter worse --- none of them give an honest judgment.

The second voting system I like --- the judges picking the bottom four --- that might actually work. But like you said --- gotta have proper judgment first and foremost.

Good topic! 👍🏼

P.S. Not liking your sig.

Originally posted by: oldblackjoe

thanks..

and i thought u wanted the kk sig.

No, see, I simply asked what happened to your KK sig ... you chose to get all uptight about it and change it back and then say that you changed it because of me to make feel selfish. 😛

Originally posted by: Summer3

So Audience decide means Public voting to see who is out. Quite fair.

Well that's a smart idea of eliminating people fairly!!! however, it's never possible to reach consensus in which contestant to eliminate..coz someone is ALWAYs having a problem!!!...but if u're talking about reducing the conflicts caused by jantaa's vote then yes, u're idea of voting system is perfect!!!

well i like your idea but the thing is the judges are WAY too lenient...they keep on giving historys all the time and it dilutes the standard of 'history'..

Originally posted by: cal-gal

Well that's a smart idea of eliminating people fairly!!! however, it's never possible to reach consensus in which contestant to eliminate..coz someone is ALWAYs having a problem!!!...but if u're talking about reducing the conflicts caused by jantaa's vote then yes, u're idea of voting system is perfect!!!

1. Alka - doesn't get taken in by toshi's weird hand movement.. he killed 2 rafi ongs and she aptly said that it sounded laboured.. and she rightly said that she was doubtful of sumitra and "fighter"priyani., who were ripped on jjws by the judges LOL
2. vishal shekhar - as long as there isn't a kishore clone who sings pancham da compositions these 2 are perfect.
3. Kunal ganjawalla- oh sure he was mean to prakriti.. but on the adult version he'd be perfect.. i may disagree with him saying that jayantt and areeb were prodigies, but he knows his stuff.
4. Kumar Sanu - proper judge. sensible.
5. shaan , sonu and kk - these would be ideal.. sure i ddont like sonu's voice so much but he knows his singing..
6. sunidhi - perfect as well.
7. himesh - but there shouldnt be any teams.. it must be just judges and singers.. no gharnas.

1. shreya - as it is she was jealous of aishwarya who was 10 yrs junior to her.. a person of her age would get ripped to shreds for no reason.
2. aadesh and lalit -OH THE HORROR - THE INFAMOUS AGNI TEAM GURUS!!
3. jatin- tho he recognised abhi and abhas as prodigies, he did some silly stuff as well like pointing out 1 mistake and giving 7 or pointing out 1 good part and giving nine.. moreover if anyone sings pehela nasha even perfectly he'll say udit worked all night for the song and give 6 or 7.
4. udit - muskurate rehete hain, lekin kintu parantu hi bolta hai. 🤢
5. pritam- 🤢
6. shankar -he is the most talented but he is too emotional.

Originally posted by: krazzy4

well i like your idea but the thing is the judges are WAY too lenient...they keep on giving historys all the time and it dilutes the standard of 'history'..