Obnoxious Salman - Page 11

I really agree with shefali 's comments.

Originally posted by: King Anu Lives

My royal advice

Don't waste his higness's time here

go to court, convince them, put salman behind bars and then come here

there are politicans and gangsters in india who have killed thousands and you are obsessed with salman. if you focus on the former then you might be able to provide justice to 1000s.

sooner you come to reality the better

dont make him a scapegoat just because he is rich.

Originally posted by: Gauri_3

🤣🤣🤣 the bolded part is funny. with you on the non-bolded part as well!

Originally posted by: shefali_123

😆😆

Reemaji,

First of all he has already deposited the entire compensation of 19 lakhs in the High Court of Mumbai. There is no giving compensation again and he did want to give but waited for the court orders because he is an accused and cannot contact the victims for giving any money.

Alistair pereira was given 3 yrs under cuplable hmicide not amounting to muder not under negligent driving or sec 279. His appeal is pending in the Supreme Court after the High Court increased his sentence to 3 yrs after the fast track court gave him only 6 months.

Plz get your facts straight.

Under negligent driving the maximum sentence still continues to be 2 years. This is section 304(a) of the IPC .

Sec 337 and 338 are additional sections applied to all accident cases and these sections donot relate to death but to greivous injury, causing damage etc .

All sentences under these acts are clubbed with the main section of culpable homicide or negligent driving because these sections carry the max sentence that can be given to a person in such cases.

Salman has pleaded "Not Guilty" even to negligent driving charges, he cannot and I repeat cannot file any petition in any court saying I have compensated and so I must be pardoned. Its not permitted under any law in force at present.

And Dipesh Menta wouldn't file any such petition and there is no such petition because the trial is going on.

And you are the one who have mixed up the two cases, not me.

In the poaching case he did approach the Supreme Cpourt for stalling of trial because he could not crossexamine the witness but Supreme Court told his lawyer that since the trial is already at fag end please come up through the appeal process.

About the accident case the Supreme Court has already decided long back and also dismissed his plea for in-camera priceeding in December 2005.

And the case is going on in the Magistrate's court in Bandra, the accident case, the prosecution has so far examined 40 witnesses according to a recent article in Deccan Chronicle. Its not going on in the Sessions Court and you need not take me there, I know what is happening as I am in Mumbai only .

The constable in the hit and run case is long dead, he was an alcoholic and he died due to tuberculosis not attended by even his family who had abandoned him long before because he was irresponsible.

He had also been suspended a number of times during his career for deriliction of duty .

And yes he has finished his testimony in court before he died.

You should be knowing this if you really knew so much about the case sitting in your library.

But the fact that you didnot know this and told that he made lakhs of rupees through Salman shows me a lot of things about you.😉

He died literally on the streets begging for money and abandoned by his own family . So much for the lakhs he made. Poor fellow must be turning is his grave.

There are no purjury charges against the constable but against the driver Harish Dulani( who has changed his stmt thrice in the court giving different version of the same incident) in the chinkara case which dates back to 1998.

And yes he did come and say on Aajtak that he was tortured by the Rajasthan cops.

How true or false it is can only be known once he is produced in court again but he has disappeared even though Salman's lawyer filed a petition seeking that he be produced in court in the interest of justice.

The chinkara case is pending appeal in the High Court of Rajasthan.

And you cannot understand what I have written because you donot know law and you are busy gathering erroneous facts about things of which you have no knowledge sitting in a library.

And no I donot wish to discuss any case through Pms with you because you have a 'closed mind' and busy gathering and showing off people your wrong info which you can go on doing at your will.😆

Thanks a lot for the offer though and incase you never read or understood,😉 I have studied law and I practice it too, so I know what I am saying.

@Megha25

😆

the chinkara case happened during 1998 at the time of shooting HSSH in Jodhpur. Its not a recent case at all. Please get your facts right before giving your opinions on something.

@ Summer3

Whoever agrees with you or Reemaji is objective and the rest are all biased , is it?? 😆

What a revelation , really!😆

Shefali you find nothing morally wrong with Salman's actions all can be forgiven by compensating a few lakhs to the injured parties? I was referring to the interview on NDTV which happened recently where he made the wildlife quote it was in reference to the chinkara case which was brought up again in 2007 years after it happened. Do you not watch the news? You are defending Salman on the basis that he pleaded "Not Guilty" even though there are witnesses to prove both cases. If you practice law why would you not have a moral stance. Or maybe the other side of the law where lawyers defend immoral acts for money.

Out of curiosity what are your views on the OJ Simpson case? 😆
Anyone can plead not guilty. If witnesses and evidence is against them their not fooling anyone if you catch my drift or maybe only those who choose to be fooled.

@ Shefali, Reema, Summer its been an interesting debate.

Originally posted by: King Anu Lives

yeah nice and effective

Why is the Highness wasting his own time here if he's not interested in debate?

I doubt anyone here has enough money to convince the Court and put the Rich behind bars let alone get their hearings to proceed faster. One person can't change the entire Indian judiciary specifically its corruption.

Originally posted by: ReemAnshu

Every person is different and so am I, for me to like or appreciate any person, the first quality which he needs to posses is that he has to be a good person for me and everything else comes in later.

I use to like Salman a lot in his early days but as time has gone by and I have personally witnessed one of his antics, since then I have taken a strong dislike.

You may call me old fashioned but I cannot seperate his personal and professional life when I look at him. I may appreciate his performance in a movie, but I cannot ever be his fan or admire him. For me he is a criminal and should be behind bars.

And some (i think Anu) said that it is about a community, then all I can say is PLEASE, it has nothing to do with community or religion. I like HR a lot, but if tomorrow he was involved in a serious crime and took the law for granted, at that very moment I would loose all respect for him.

It is similar to Sanjay Dutt, in the 80's as a growing kid, I loved him so much but again when he broke the law, just developed a strong dislike.

Any criminals who commit serious offences like abeiting terrorism, keepin AK-47's, killing people while driving in drunk condition, hunting animals, buying cocaine (Fardeen), etc will always remain criminals for me. I just HATE people who take the law for granted and use their position to get out of these things. If you do the crime then you must do the time.

You may find me wierd but I believe in this and I am very passionate about my belief, I just hate any form of Corruption or lawlessness and I will pray till my last breath that my country get rid of these evils. Hence for me, someone like a Salman Khan will always be Obnoxious.

I mean no offence to his fans, you may continue to love him, these are just my views which I am sharing and do not wish to impose them.

Wow Reema you speak so eloquently. I agree with you justice should always be given whether it be the case of Salman or corrupt politicians. If you do the crime then do the time. If people can love stars even if they commit serious criminal offenses, then continue to do so we have no problem with that. Just don't try to justify their wrong actions by calling them right that's all. Peace.

This looks like the 100 years wars. 😆

Originally posted by: Summer3

This looks like the 100 years wars. 😆

I conclude everyone has a point and is looking at the same object from a different angle.

yr wife looks pretty summerji😆😆