India-Forums.com- Participation Guidelines & Rules - Page 18

Once again, i have been ignored with my queries. thanx.

Talking about MIDs...do you know, Mr Vijay, that the main cause of these MIDs flooding the Forum is you and your half-baked, ambiguous rules? With a 20% warning level increased on any post which goes against your military-clad rules, you will make sure that the members are banned after just 5 posts notwithstanding of the extent of derogatory language they used. Don't you think warning levels must be dished out in accordance to the post itself i.e. how insulting/abusive/derogatory it was?

Originally posted by: vijay

Sorry we cannot allow separate account to PM members.

But yes there can be "join" mailing list if the member agrees to subscriber to your post and wants a mail whenever you post any update to your FanFic.

Tell me if that option will work?

Originally posted by: lazyleaves

Do you know vijay, by not acknowledging posts by members despite of the fact that they are REPEATEDLY asking you to listen to them is an insult?


In the real world, this is equivalent to you ignoring people standing next to you right in the middle of a huge stadium with the whole world to witness how 'well' you treat your members.


I have never felt this insulted ever! Whats the WL for the person who insults others and mocks them? Who will give you a rise in WL? Will it be viewable to the whole IF or only certain members of the DT?


Your attitude has turned me bitter towards IF.

Your silence means two things:-

a. You know we are right and you have no way to defend your DT.

b. You know you are wrong and you have no courage to own up!


@Olive and Ninja: I guess this whole page is going to be ignored now! Unless someone comes praising the DTs!

Well this is the first time I am seeing your post probably so I don't know why you got the feeling that you have been insulted? I try to reply as many I can in the limited time I have. Well if you are bitter cause I have not replied to your post than I can just say sorry for the delays from my side cause as I get so many posts/PM that it gets practically impossible to reply each and every post personally even if I try to do so. Some of the questions that has been left out were repetitive and has already been answered in another threads and I didn't have anything new to add on it so may have been left out due to lack of time.

Please get in touch with the Channel Moderators of the forums in which you are active on and they will help you out with your queries / suggestions.

Regards,

Vijay,
Since you requested another member to wait patiently bcz you are so busy and you have lots of pending msgs to answer.I will also wait.I have been waiting for 3 months for mod ahaana to read my msg.Now I am quite used to this.I will wait patiently even if takes years for you to reply.

^That was my fourth comment on the thread. Thank you so much for replying. I frequent only IPK and the FF forum and I personally am very happy with the DTs there and have never faced any issues with them.


But my issue is with your higher DT including you. In the 3 weeks when all the DTs had mysteriously gone on a leave (I checked all the forums where the notes were posted. Funny fact: Two notes by two different MODs were same), I had PMed SIX DTs, you included. 2 of your GMs had not logged in in ages! One of your GMs was busy increasing her posts by posting the number '8' and names on a thread (The new rule will implement here, won't it?). The other two DTs whom I PMed were you and priya.nair. Another was the forum DT.


I know the DTs are busy and have their own personal life to handle. But don't you think if you have taken up the responsibility then you should at least come online and do all the spamming that you want, AFTER you have addressed the issues of the members?


I have never been in fights with anyone on the forum or any MODs. I have no issues with any of these MODs actually but my only problem is their carelessness towards their responsibilities. If they cant continue to handle their duties, appoint someone who at least is active on the forum. If you wish to know the names of these DTs, its there in your inbox in my message.


In fact, I would like to appreciate Angel-Jot. and ~Saraa~ who looked in to our issue, even during their leave because the DTs we were asked to speak to were unresponsive!


Basically you need an active and responsive higher DT or else the grievances will only pile up!

thanx for these new rules vijay...but do u think these will really work????

Originally posted by: -Aimz-

Talking about MIDs...do you know, Mr Vijay, that the main cause of these MIDs flooding the Forum is you and your half-baked, ambigious rules? With a 20% warning level increased on any post which goes against your military-clad rules, you will make sure that the members are banned after just 5 posts notwithstanding of the extent of derogatory language they used. Don't you think warning levels must be dished out in accordance to the post itself i.e. how insulting/abusive/derogatory it was?

And I quite frankly believe you are quite biased in your judgement and implementation. It's as if you are after those members' virtual IDs who dare to question you, especially those you have so conveniently called "hatemongers" (oh btw, did you give yourself a WL for that? Because you very eagerly give a straight away 20% WL raise for a comment calling someone 'two-faced' which was more of a fact than an opinion...just as you believed that it's a fact that a group not licking any celeb's asses is 'hatemongering' and not just your own opinion)

Hopefully you will get over your selective replying, and give me a reply within this century.

Well warning levels are certainly given in accordance to the post itself. Since you posted about your own WL I would simply like to know why you are posting selectively the reason for which you were given a WL increase. You also know it was not raised cause you just called someone "two-faced" but it was much more than that against another member (not me or any of the DT).

This is the problem with some of the members that they create a lot of hue and cry about how IF should protect its members from personal attacks and when we do that they will call us "biased".

Regarding the MID issue also I tend to disagree with you cause much of the MIDs are created just to bash someone without getting identified and it is not something very recent but this challenge has always been there and unfortunately we have limited options. There are even instances we have seen members creating MIDs to bash themselves up or make post against a certain group so that they can instigate other members and create unrest in the forum.

Regards,

I would differ from some members here pointing a finger at Aahaana for not replying to PMs. She is one of those GMs who replies to PMs rather promptly. Lately, she might have been busy with her personal life but she does address the urgent issues.