Draupadi is the main topic of discussion of Mahabharata but sorry I never feel her justification anything right sorry but I really don't like draupadi now you all will be like what type of girl is she
My question always is the battle was really faught because wrong was done with draupadi
She was the only one who was having swayamwar and insulted Karna for Sarthi ya it was her choice to choose the bridegroom but it was only her rule to arrange that chunauti and there was no condition that only king will do that from before anyway she got punishment as she got married two five men
Anyway now coming to her molestation yes wrong happened with her but how only kaurava were wrong her husband were more wrong then why she not left them or kept a prank that you all will also kill yourself
I don't know how yudhistir done only one adharma as told in the last the biggest adharma he done by putting draupadi as bet
So sorry I don't feel Mahabharata yudh was faught for draupadi to justice in case of draupadi pandava and kaurava both were wrong and i feel she somewhere given punishment to them by untieing her hair and kaurava was given in battle
But my opinion is Mahabharata battle was faught so that right people are able to rule the kingdom inspire of what pandava done with draupadi and were totally wrong in that but they were someone who would not wrong others without any reason but kaurava were capable of
Like whatever has shown till now I will go on it
I don't want to bring Indian law and this that as here only telekaw is applicable
As they have always said that on LAL Mahal 1000 families run so satrupa is fighting the battle so that those 1000 families get right ruler but shudha on the other hand has chance to choose her path and she chooses the path of obsession
She was having path that she could leave happily somewhere with her son if she was not having money then they would have paid alimony and she could have given a life to narottam but no she chooses the path of revenge
If whatever they are showing is right I don't want to go in history but it is there that she was never raped it was mutual relationship with both permission and I feel always a woman has responsibility of child that's why God has given them right to carry baby if baldev like useless people refuse to accept then either you abort or give proper life to your baby or throw but don't blame others
It is only our blame on boys that these men chauvinist society has given the child a name illegitimate so I feel a woman if without marriage is bold enough to make relationship and give birth then it's her responsibility for the child totally because God has gifted female this pleasure of carrying a child 9 month the most beautiful phase of woman life
So like Mahabharata satrupa here is fighting for all to get a nice ruler but shudha is fighting for her own revenge where both party were equally wrong so her revenge nullifies
She could have took revenge but first by giving a life to narottam
We don't feel that much against for satrupa for giving anami as anami was having happy life that's how if today shudha would have came for revenge only after giving a life to narottam then I would have sided with her
Like look at dheeru he even was wronged but he has given life to his children first even now he is keeping them away
Sorry for the rant as this is my thought I am never able to justify anything on the name of God or custom
Like I question Rama for what has done with sita whatever logic they give like shraap or something but I can't buy and justify him as God
That's how I will not justify draupadi for insulting Karna or blaming solely to kaurava because everyone was at fault