The hands you take and the hands you leave Part 63-Updated page 149 - Page 74

From the talks of Gayathri with Anami, it is clear that Dada fell in love with dadi and married her by convincing both the parents. And dadi was teasing Anami about her supposed love and was encouraged her in that regard. So I don't think either dadi or dadaji were against love marriage, if BD and Sudha's love interest was genuine. Gayathri would have supported their love in the beginning and would have blessed Sudha.She would have encouraged them

@usha if Narotham is not Baldev's son why they are keeping him. One DNA test is enough to disaprove Sudha's claim that Narotham is Baldev son. If they dont know that fact then why he is mistreated in LM. Why they take the punishment on him. See in royal families bloodline matters. Sudha is not Satrupa. The pedigree of Satrupa, Sudha doesnt have. Somewhere that factor has played a lot in Sudha-Baldev love story.

Sudha hit Baldev where it matters the most. The son of LM who has been denied rights in RS Sudha shows him that mirror. Poonam had told one thing to Anami about Baldev. People imposed their decisions on him, never asked him what he wants . He was never considered an individual. It was then Anami goes and gives choice to Baldev and finally he agrees for DNA test. A person's individuality is what get suppressed in families like that of LM. When the family suppresses the individuality the person tries to get it from somewhere else. Most probably what happened with Baldev was searching individuality and searching acceptance which he found in Sudha. Vatsalya is suffocated in LM ways and plans to run away, which results in his death. Anami also doesnt like the imposing ways of LM. She is openly defiant, but what both Baldev and Vatsalya lacked Anami has. That's support for some of her so called liberal activities. Reason is nothing the guilt of abandoning the child allows Satrupa and Gayatri to take somewhat lenient view with her. Also Anami's empthatheic nature plays an important part where she stands for others in true sense. What we need to see is that today Baldev went away from Sudha. How she is going to put more poison in him.

On one side we see Sudha poisoning Baldev with pointed words, she is trying to keep Anami by her side by using kids. She makes kids paints and of course Anami is happy as she takes breakfast for Sudha. And then in her need to impress Anami more and keep her engaged with her sob story she opens the old suitcase and from it falls the photos which Sudha doesnt want Anami to see. Sudha thinks Anami only considers her sick. No, that is one part, the other part is the suspicion Adhiraj had planted on her and today Sudha playing with the photos makes Anami suspicious of her. Yes she will investigate and it is the beginning. Satrupa says she wont do anything, let Sudha do and Anami find out. It has to be like that. Anami herself will have to reach Sudha's truth. In that journey Ladoo, vatsalya, Adhiraj will become her strong support as what they show will be the truth without manipulation because unlike Gayatri and Satrupa these 3 doesnt have any need to show half truths. Somewhere I feel Baldev will move closer to Sudha and Anami will move farther. But Baldev moving close can have serious repucurssions and we dont know what.

Coming to Adhiraj and Anami. I am happy CVs are exploring all facets of their relation. The freedom they take with each other. First anger. Then slowly melting towards each other's way. That ice cream was perfect way of showing Anami thawing towards Adhiraj. I mean he lied, but she forgave him unlike the first time that happened with DNA. It is a relation that is slowly growing intense. As Adhiraj said he cannot see her tensed. Now coming to death certificate of Purushottam. I hope Adhiraj investigate this angle. I dont think he is dead. Anyone can make a death certificate with some money.

Story is slowly moving towards the centre of Chakravyuh. The centre where the real battle will happen. The centre where will see the ugly power in all its glory.

I see parallels of this in the RKC family. Vikram and Gayathri have a good marriage because there was both love and duty in it. Baldev was the only heir and he was brought up with more duty so perhaps he rebelled and that was Sudha ? All the love he probably had was given to Sudha. He made a dutiful marriage to Satrupa and saw to it a heir was born. I don't think he ever gave Satrupa love, but he was lucky in that he found a very dutiful wife who took up the slack in his place. Unfortunately their son took after Baldev. He did not inherit his mother's sense of duty but father's restlessness and cost him his life. The new heir Anami has no ties to LM, but has inherited her mother's sense of duty. if channeled well, could this heir to LM finally be the ONE that could be a savior almost.

Prince William does not seem keen on being the heir to the throne. He would be happy flying. It must be difficult to have your life planned out for you from the moment you were born. But most of us cannot identify with it or be sympathetic to it as it comes with great wealth and power most times. Many of us struggle to find what we are good at so we rather envy someone like that. So too most royals seem to yearn to find something for themselves they are good at. When you are a heir to a legacy the person is obscured by the weight of it. People are more interested in the legacy than the person who will carry it forward. But people matter. An heir is a person first with their own hopes and dreams. Was Baldev treated as a son first or heir first ? It matters. Parvarish matters. Treating a person as an individual matters. The LM wasis are bearing the brunt of treating their children more like heirs than individuals.

@mangothyme duty has to be accepted, not imposed. The whole problem happens when it is imposed. In royal families from the time a heir is born people plan his whole life and he has to walk on that line whether he wants it or doesnt wants it. They are not allowed to grow up as an individual and then take up the responsibility on their own. Both Baldev and Vatsalya were groomed to be right. For Anami Murari Pathak and Madhoo Pathak gave direction, she was allowed to choose on discretion. She was allowed to make mistakes and learn from them. Hence Anami is more responsible and if you see in Ladoo also we see the same streak. He chooses. He observes. Right and wrong was not imposed on pandit kids. They were taught humanity and not morality and that will make all the difference. Same is the case with Adhi to some extend. His mother also has not taught him morality but he has been taught humanity and a sense of purpose to get justice.