Nasir was Malik-us-Sharq

overactor thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#1
(Lord of the East) 😆 he was the governor of Bengal 🤔 and died after one year of his rule🤔 is this the right info?

Created

Last reply

Replies

2

Views

1k

Users

2

Likes

1

Frequent Posters

702755 thumbnail
Posted: 10 years ago
#2
Yes, he was Malik-us-Sharq but he soon died after he suppressed rebellion in Bengal. But he won't die till he produce a son. His son will be named after him and he will become the last ruler of Slave dyansty of Iltutmish.
overactor thumbnail
12th Anniversary Thumbnail Stunner Thumbnail + 3
Posted: 10 years ago
#3

Originally posted by: Roxelana

Yes, he was Malik-us-Sharq but he soon died after he suppressed rebellion in Bengal. But he won't die till he produce a son. His son will be named after him and he will become the last ruler of Slave dyansty of Iltutmish.

His son would succeed ala ud din right who was the son of ruknuddin😆

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".