A Question about the Vow

tamil_nalan thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail Engager Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#1
I have a question about the vow. I understand that there are people who believe they have to give up something to gain something.

In Paro's case she wanted that Rudra survived the Poison Ladoo, so she prayed to God that she would gave up her most precious thing aka Rudra if he gets better.

So Paro sees Rudra as her most precious thing in life.

But once during the wedding vows Rudra made the vow that Rudra will never belong to Paro. Of course he was intoxicated but in this moment he meant the vow?

So Rudra never belonged to Paro according to his vow, so doesn't it make the Vow of Paro invalid?

Because she cant give him up if he didnt belong to Paro.

I am quite confused about the vow, but this could be a loophole, or?

Created

Last reply

Replies

1

Views

537

Users

2

Likes

6

Frequent Posters

Deezi thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 11 years ago
#2
Paro didn't mean rudra as in a thing more precious than her life, she gave up his saath, his presence in her life, the moments she'll spend with him, her lifetime with him.
It doesn't matter what vows rudra took during the drunken wedding, he himself has been breaking those vows from the next day itself.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".