i dont understand...pls explain...

Page

ab98623

@ab98623

Explorer

Posted: 11 years ago

i agree that Paro was at first treated like a suspect...

but later on,Rudra tried his very best to try and make her understand that he wasnt wrong...

he tried it aggressively,(because dat is his nature)...n later on he even went to helpless pleading...

so y dint v react about Paro being blind...or insensitive towards the soldiers...etc...???

and now Paro is trying to prove herself right,and she suddenly becomes the one with no self respect??

when Rudra tried to explain to her,did she listen to him...?then y r v expecting a man who is still stuck so badly with his past,his parents being his "dukti nass" to accept that she is not responsible for all that has happened?

both of them are opposites...so y expect Paro to leave him behind after all that she has misunderstood about him?would the guilt,or d will to set things right not drive her to do what she's doing right now?

after all he has saved her life not only once,but multiple times...

according to some of us,she may not owe him this...

but if Rudra's character is angry and aggressive...similarly,Paro's is strong but soft and loving...

if he tried to convince her by force,she will convince him y her methods...

if there is anything that is common in both of them,its their stubbornness...

did u guys notice,dat even if Rudra was drunk,it wasnt as though he dint recognize Paro...

so he actually knows dat she is not at fault...

subconsciously,both of them know each other...it is only when they are conscious,that they misunderstand each other...

i think i hav understood the nature of the characters quite well...if not perfectly...

so i find nothing wrong with d current track...

this is justmy opinion...

feel free to comment!!