Rudra and Laila ...The Great Debate... - Page 4

I think it is very convenient for men to shrug off any form of commitment by professing to be honest and upright about the relationship. I am glad you brought that point up. There re indeed many ways of commiting oneself to another, and it doesn't always need a verbal declaration.

Why do men believe that it absolves them of all sins just because he had never promised her a happily ever after? You are in a relationship with someone for a decade yet you say you are not into commitments.

Men are hypocrites. And we women are utter fools for letting them play with our emotions. I really don't buy the bs propagated by some people who believe that the man is " damaged" and how it is the touch of the right woman , her chaste , pure love that can heal the man. Utter BS, I tell you. Just a convenient way out, an easy excuse.

Originally posted by: ebook-reader

I think it is very convenient for men to shrug off any form of commitment by professing to be honest and upright about the relationship. I am glad you brought that point up. There re indeed many ways of commiting oneself to another, and it doesn't always need a verbal declaration.

Why do men believe that it absolves them of all sins just because he had never promised her a happily ever after? You are in a relationship with someone for a decade yet you say you are not into commitments.

Men are hypocrites. And we women are utter fools for letting them play with our emotions. I really don't buy the bs propagated by some people who believe that the man is " damaged" and how it is the touch of the right woman , her chaste , pure love that can heal the man. Utter BS, I tell you. Just a convenient way out, an easy excuse.

Originally posted by: .bohemian.

A misogynist, and does not mind a sexual relationship with a woman. 8 years in a relationship? What age did he start, 20? All is forgiven when he sets eyes on the fair maiden.. for she is going to reform him. 😡 This is indeed a Paro-Rudra story, but they should stop painting the 'other woman' black.

Oh I have to say this - I know enough women - real breathing ones who decided to let their partners of years go because they happened to fall in love with someone else / needed to marry someone else for whatever reason.

I neither understand the need to demonise Laila nor do I see the need to justify her. I'm somewhere in between. She knew what she was getting into, but like many other women she lived in the hope that the man would change one day for her. But he didn't. So I do understand her hurt and sense of betrayal. But on the other hand I don't think she is justified to react the way she is- manipulating to hurt the other person in the equation instead if hurting Rudra.

And that my opinion, I don't feel either of those emotions towards her. And I still believe that her character is badly written and uni dimensional for me.

Originally posted by: meera30

Oh I have to say this - I know enough women - real breathing ones who decided to let their partners of years go because they happened to fall in love with someone else / needed to marry someone else for whatever reason.

All I am saying is - this is not a gender thing. Whether a man does it or a woman is immaterial.

I am not judging, merely quoting the fact that it happens - right or wrong. And the person who is left in the lurch, may decide to pursue a variety of options - how a hurt soul reacts is what makes human behavior interesting.

So even if we were to forget the morality, without reactions from Laila or Lavanya, what fun would their be at all? And just for that they deserve every color in the palette - not just the tainted black or the dull grey!

More than men its women who are hypocrites

Women in 8 years relationship deserves an answer from the said man
Just because woman having sex before marriage makes her a pros and she is getting name called and she is a women with emotions and she deserves love and family
If laila is pros then rudra is also pros why gender bias

People calling her whatever by name are no trp audience but progressive women.I was really routing for laila today rudra deserves it.

For once can we have a bold female lead who is ready to jump on to bed with ML and not silent innocent FL

NB: I can empathize with her. Yes, it seems illogical an rather unfair on her part to hurt someone she never had any business with, namely Paro. But all I can say in her defence is that "Zhakm abhi taaaza hai". She's bleeding. And her wounds are still fresh. You can't expect her to act rationally. I am sure time would mellow her and would give her the maturity to move on. She might not stop loving him but she would certainly accept his relationship with the "other" woman.

Originally posted by: ttt1

short and sweet !

but television is the 1st democracy , it goes by exactly what people want the scary thing is what people want

😆 Right back at me, eh.

It gets scarier by the day.