What if it was Paro instead?

Page

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

What if it was Paro instead of Rudra?😉 Ahem...😆

Yeah, I'm talking about Rudra's "encounter" with Laila. Laila uski le li, yeh hum likh ke keh sakte hain. 😛 Now, what if it was Paro (or any freaking other female lead in a soap) who was shown to have had a tryst with another guy before the male lead, would you accept it?

Just a survey to see if the "Bad Girl" is as acceptable to the audience as the quintessential Bad Buyoy.

Quote

Frequent Posters

Midnight

@Midnightsorrow

Trailblazer

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

No not at all they wouldn't Indian audience are so biases when it comes to woman 🤢

With a guy it's drooling and hot but with a girl she would be called a "s**t" 🤢

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

jeesie

@jeesie

Navigator

Posted: 12 years ago

That's a million dollar Q my friend , I think who ever is appreciating Laila ,s closeness with RUDRA , they have to except PARO affair also , cuz usually girls have some crushes , relationships and affairs before marriage or true love , this is a realistic and practical approach

Quote

tvbuf

@tvbuf

Sparkler

+ 4

Posted: 12 years ago

No one will accept the bad girl

Is there any doubt ?

We have all been brought up in a certain way, and what we heard/learnt while growing up has stayed with us, no matter how biased.

If we can teach the next generation to think differently, then awesome 😛

Quote

964749

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

Very thought provoking question!

Personally, I would have no qualms accepting such a female lead. Women are human too, ergo they also have needs. 😛

However, I don't think Indian TV industry will ever show such a thing. They have evolved a lot, showing male leads like Rudra who are not as holy as Ganga jal. 😆

But I don't think they have come around to showing female leads who are the same. It would be a blasphemy for people at this point. 😆

Edited by MissCoco - 12 years ago

Quote

samirao

@samirao

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

👏 Fab post ,if male lead can do any thing before true love , female lead can do the same thing , she is also a human being with needs

Edited by samirao - 12 years ago

Quote

samirao

@samirao

Dazzler

+ 2

Posted: 12 years ago

Now no one is going to discus that cuz , if man do it he is hot sexy , with needs sizzling chemistry , but for female lead a big NO

Quote

441597

Suspended

Posted: 12 years ago

From what I've noticed, "Bad Boys" and "Bad Girls" have two distinct definitions for Television Show-makers.

Bad Boy--Rude, Arrogant, Snobbish (throw in some wit for the "sexay and wild" quotient), and of course----a hit with the ladies with a different one in his sack every week.

Bad Girl--Spoiled, arrogant, snooty (with NO major redeeming qualities, mind you), a bully maybe...in short, A TOTAL BITCH. But hey, hold on---she might be a total Harridan on the top floor, but should be purer than Gangajaal down there. A li'l bit of flirting and basking-shasking in attention-stattention is okay...I mean, okay-dokey...but no unlocking the chastity belt till the hero comes along and reforms her a la Himmatwala. 😳

Alright, not really seen a bad girl lead as yet on TV (no idea about exceptions, if any, enlighten me here will ya), but the bad boy is definitely a rage---even from the times when he was just a flirt and not really banging the headboards with anyone.

So, who'd like to see the BAD GIRL on TV? Do we ever see such a possibility and will YOU endorse it?

Edited by krystal_watz - 12 years ago

Quote

Uthra

@Viji79

Inactive

+ 6

Posted: 12 years ago

Originally posted by: krystal_watz
From what I've noticed, "Bad Boys" and"Bad Girs" have two istinct definitions for Television Show-makers.

Bad Boy--Rude, Arrogant, Snobbish (throw in some wit for the "sexay and wild" quotient), and of course----a hit with the ladies with a different one in his sack every week.

Bad Girl--Spoiled, arrogant, snooty (with NO major redeeming qualitites, mind you), a bully maybe...in short, A TOTAL BITCH. But hey, hold on---she might be a total Harridan on the top floor, but should be purer than Gangajaal down there. A li'l bit of flirting and basking-shasking in attention-stattention is okay...I mean, okay-dokey...but no ulocking the chastity belt til the hero comes along and reforms her a la Himmatwala.

Alright, not really seen a bad girl lead as yet on TV (no idea about exceptions, if any, enlighten me here will ya), but the bad boy id definitely a rage---even from the times when he was just a flirt and not really banging the headboards with anyone.

So, who'd like to see the BAD GIRL on TV? Do we ever see such a possibility and will YOU endorse it?

The only TV bad girl that comes close to this definition, that I can think of is Tapasya from Uttaran.

Quote

Sultan_Of_Swing

@Sultan_Of_Swing

Sparkler

+ 7

Posted: 12 years ago

#10

Kystal I have already seen a number of posts outside of this forum, calling Sanaya a s**t & what not for wearing the outfits she does in the show.

So with any shadow of doubt I can say that any actress playing a role like that would be brutally criticised and s**t shamed.

Quote

1 2 3 4 5 ... 7

What if it was Paro instead?

Related Topics

Explore Topics