Reality vs glamour [DT Note-Pg7 &15] - Page 13

even I feel the same. I want full dress for Paro. her costume is unnecessarily exposed.

Originally posted by: ankitamishra201

hey u r guy ...good to see dat boys r also here , i thought only gals comes on dis site

vaise i agree wid wat u said ...😊

Aww well there is quite a few huys here who r san fans..i know about 8 or more



😳

Originally posted by: mpat

Beautiful Sanaya...beautiful clothes...what a waistline.
Why would anyone want to cover it up in the show.
The other women with Parvati...thank goodness their waistlines were covered. 😆

Tomorrow when I go to the Gym I am showing my trainer Sanaya's waist and tell him that mine needs to look like that ...real fast. 😃

👏and blast goes another set of indian ladkis into an anorexic future. not everyone can have a waist like sanaya irani. and that is okay. learn to accept it.

i dont have a problem with the length of her blouse or the way her skirt looks like its stuck to her lower waist with glue.
i have a problem with the way her dupatta is draped.
i had a problem when khushi safetypinned her dupatta.
i had a problem when kumud used one layer chiffon for her dupatta.
i have a problem with those churidar styles that put a layer of chiffon at your midriff, too.
those are my personal problems.

i dont mind deepika wearing that outfit in ramleela because that is a movie that you go to theaters to see.. you choose to see it.. and it is a one time thing. and that movie has a rating of U/A or PG13.

this is a little closer to home. this IS a daily soap, whatever its makers want it to be. there are a lot of people watching the show, not just people of the urban/NRI community who dont care if they see less clothes than normal(as long as it is "glamorous").

in my personal opinion, it looks ridiculous when a woman with half her naked skin on display * looks pious/corteous/aagyakari.( * as compared to the support actors/extras- the women around her) ah well, i guess it matches with a "hero" who kills ruthlessly.

i dont think any of the 90's heroines looked less glamorous because they wore clothes that covered their body better. what say madhuri, kajol, aishwarya, sushmita?

when the bandits touched parvati.. i was expecting at least one to go straight for her buttercream hip.. because those hips were made to be touched. but the extras were careful to touch only clothed parts of her body.. why? because the actress, sanaya as a person, is uncomfortable with unknown men groping her? or is it because that would hit too close to reality? or because there is censoring on tv, too?

.
i come from a village, i come from a town.. i was raised by parents who insisted that a woman's virtue is accented by the clothes she wears. as a grown woman, i feel that you can be beautiful, and glamorous, without exposing your body. if you disagree, okay. if you agree, okay. this is my opinion, and thats it, rant over.

Originally posted by: pink.lotus

👏and blast goes another set of indian ladkis into an anorexic future. not everyone can have a waist like sanaya irani. and that is okay. learn to accept it.

i dont have a problem with the length of her blouse or the way her skirt looks like its stuck to her lower waist with glue.
i have a problem with the way her dupatta is draped.
i had a problem when khushi safetypinned her dupatta.
i had a problem when kumud used one layer chiffon for her dupatta.
i have a problem with those churidar styles that put a layer of chiffon at your midriff, too.
those are my personal problems.

i dont mind deepika wearing that outfit in ramleela because that is a movie that you go to theaters to see.. you choose to see it.. and it is a one time thing. and that movie has a rating of U/A or PG13.

this is a little closer to home. this IS a daily soap, whatever its makers want it to be. there are a lot of people watching the show, not just people of the urban/NRI community who dont care if they see less clothes than normal(as long as it is "glamorous").

in my personal opinion, it looks ridiculous when a woman with half her naked skin on display * looks pious/corteous/aagyakari.( * as compared to the support actors/extras- the women around her) ah well, i guess it matches with a "hero" who kills ruthlessly.

i dont think any of the 90's heroines looked less glamorous because they wore clothes that covered their body better. what say madhuri, kajol, aishwarya, sushmita?

when the bandits touched parvati.. i was expecting at least one to go straight for her buttercream hip.. because those hips were made to be touched. but the extras were careful to touch only clothed parts of her body.. why? because the actress, sanaya as a person, is uncomfortable with unknown men groping her? or is it because that would hit too close to reality? or because there is censoring on tv, too?

.
i come from a village, i come from a town.. i was raised by parents who insisted that a woman's virtue is accented by the clothes she wears. as a grown woman, i feel that you can be beautiful, and glamorous, without exposing your body. if you disagree, okay. if you agree, okay. this is my opinion, and thats it, rant over.

Personally I dont like short blouse be it on anyone in movie or in Tv.

My final comment on this thread. I am just going to say that people are free to have their own likes and dislikes and I know that some people may not like certain ways of dressing which is understandable. I am surely not judging everyone or questioning everyone's sensibilities. Some may even be unaware of how Rajasthani women really dress. I myself was no expert.

But I am wary of certain people and their POV and I have strong reasons for this. As I said earlier, deja vu. And in this case, her clothes aren't even unauthentic. I loved Paro's look from day one, and after googling the pics, I like them even more as I can now see that the makers have indeed kept it realistic.

Rafaya1 and ankitamishra201 - thanks.

ipkknd_ - You're right. The clothes aren't really glamorous and sexy if you look at them as just clothes. It's Sanaya who makes them look sexy without appearing vulgar in any way. Loved your whole comment...very well put.👏

Sunara - thanks sweety. 🤗🤗 love you too. muahh. 😳 I think they have done a good job in making Sanaya look different than others, and maintaining the authenticity at the same time.

Vimal89 - Agree with your comment. She has a killer figure and if she has no qualms flaunting it than why should we? She looks gorgeous as Paro and does look like a village girl to me as well.

paro is beautiful dan khushi, gunjan and chhanchhan. .m in love wid paro look of sanaya..its different nd sexy.

Originally posted by: pink.lotus

👏and blast goes another set of indian ladkis into an anorexic future.not everyone can have a waist like sanaya irani. and that is okay. learn to accept it.

i dont have a problem with the length of her blouse or the way her skirt looks like its stuck to her lower waist with glue.
i have a problem with the way her dupatta is draped.
i had a problem when khushi safetypinned her dupatta.
i had a problem when kumud used one layer chiffon for her dupatta.
i have a problem with those churidar styles that put a layer of chiffon at your midriff, too.
those are my personal problems.

i dont mind deepika wearing that outfit in ramleela because that is a movie that you go to theaters to see.. you choose to see it.. and it is a one time thing. and that movie has a rating of U/A or PG13.

this is a little closer to home. this IS a daily soap, whatever its makers want it to be. there are a lot of people watching the show, not just people of the urban/NRI community who dont care if they see less clothes than normal(as long as it is "glamorous").

in my personal opinion, it looks ridiculous when a woman with half her naked skin on display * looks pious/corteous/aagyakari.( * as compared to the support actors/extras- the women around her) ah well, i guess it matches with a "hero" who kills ruthlessly.

i dont think any of the 90's heroines looked less glamorous because they wore clothes that covered their body better. what say madhuri, kajol, aishwarya, sushmita?

when the bandits touched parvati.. i was expecting at least one to go straight for her buttercream hip.. because those hips were made to be touched. but the extras were careful to touch only clothed parts of her body.. why? because the actress, sanaya as a person, is uncomfortable with unknown men groping her? or is it because that would hit too close to reality? or because there is censoring on tv, too?

.
i come from a village, i come from a town.. i was raised by parents who insisted that a woman's virtue is accented by the clothes she wears. as a grown woman, i feel that you can be beautiful, and glamorous, without exposing your body. if you disagree, okay. if you agree, okay. this is my opinion, and thats it, rant over.