Vibs
Thanks. Yeah, I've heard of some of those versions. In Valmiki itself, in the Uttarkand, towards the end of the narrative, Rama asks Agastya and other rishis why Ravan chose to abduct Sita when he knew that Rama was capable of killing him. The answer was that he wanted to be killed by Rama. Something I find inexplicable about this explanation is that if that was the case, why didn't he just confront Rama in Panchavati, rather than get into a war that sacrificed Indrajit, Kumbhakarna and a whole bunch of other Rakshasha heros? But it is there in Valmiki - I wonder whether your Griffith translation has it?
Years ago, when we toured S India, in Karnataka, we came across a temple where Ravan was the deity (wish I remember where that was). I too have read of how Ravan is regarded as a hero, but I was curious about how people in Sri Lanka - particularly Sinhalas - regard him. Obviously, since they are Buddhists, Rama has no religious significance, but what I was wondering was that from a historical pov, do they look at this as an invasion of their country by a foreigner that ended tragically for their ruler?