Originally posted by: Krishni51
So,you mean all the versions made on SitaRam,Valmiki Ramayan,Ram Charit Manas,Bhavartha Ramayan,Adhyatma Ramayan,Kamba Ramayan,Jain Ramayan etc. are the varying interpretations of the absolute truth!Don't get confused between one who is recording an event and those who are interpreting it subsequently. Every version you mention, and there are others as well, they are recording or retelling the events as they took place, not interpreting them. They also tell us what they are recoding. That is, pick up any version of Ramayan and it'll tell you unambiguously that it is a retelling of the divine play of ParBrahm SitaRam. Of course, since there are so many events, a version may pick up or skip an event and another version may skip some other event. Also, since we are talking about events so ancient, the versions which we have today can, & most probably do, contain some later interpolations here & there.
Now, it's the readers who do their interpretations. And why they do it? We have already answered that question in earlier posts, because different people are under three different facets of Maayic power. If every reader is to completely believe that Shri Ram is Supreme Lord, that means everyone reading Ramayan happens to be a Ram bhakt, situation regarding different interpretations will be greatly simplified. But when that's not the case, different interpretations start. We have already seen in an earlier post how we have different interpretations of a single event (though disputed) mentioned in Uttarkand of Valmiki Ramayan. we can take up any other example as well. for example, when Shri Ram, along with Lakshman, comes back to his hut and finds it empty, he suffers extreme sorrow & anxiety over the absence of Sitaji. He starts shouting "Sita, Sita", he asks the animals, birds and trees of the forest if they know where Sitaji is, and falls unconscious again & again! Every version of Ramayan merely records this event. Readers subsequently look at it in different ways. Ask any bhakt and he'll say that his Lord is trying to act human. Asking animals, birds & trees of the forest about the whereabouts of mom, that's Shri Ram's idea of enacting a human setting scene of dad coming back home & not finding the wife there, asking all his kids if they know where their mom is. And when the kids don't tell him anything, he starts crying, shouting, "Sita," & falls unconscious.
But those who have doubt about the Vedic claim that SitaRam is the Supreme personality, will see this event and say, "Oh, so this man who is crying on not finding his wife at home, and is repeatedly falling unconscious because of extreme sorrow, is supposed to be the Supreme Personality, all powerful, all knowing, and Sarva Vyapak. I don't get it." See.
Though some are Satvik , some Rajasic , some Tamsic interpretations they all are of the absolute truth(directly or indirectly)!If I'm not troubling you I want to know one thing...They say Ramayan,Mahabharat etc. truly happened 1000s of years ago.Definitely there will be a chronology of events that took place!Of course there is. This chronology is what all versions of Ramayan are informing us about. Only thing is, different versions skip this or that event, and some versions may suffer from later interpolations, as is widely believed about the Uttar kand of valmiki Ramayan.
Sita and Ram if were born on earth "Born" is misleading in this case. They are without any beginning, and therefore have no end. Being the Lord of all realms, and Sarva Vyapak, He manifests himself whenever he feels like it, in His Maayic realm, which is not separate from Him, rather is contained IN HIMin different bodies though one in soul "different bodies" is again misleading. Please try thinking beyond the Maayic concepts of a soul inside three bodies, i.e. casual, astral & physical, in this case. SitaRam is one personality, though visible as two, and NOT two different bodies. I know I am unable to explain this properly, really sorry about that, but that's the best I could do. This means, that who is Sita is Ram & vice versa. Here, the concept of two different bodies won't stand. Sita & Ram, depending upon their choice, may appear to us sitting next to each other, or they may appear to us separated by thousands of miles, this doesn't mean they are "two different bodies." Note that Veds simply define this Supreme Couple as "infinite bliss" (the exact term used for them in Veds is "Anant Ananda.")then they might have lead a life though not ordinary a yogic life I should say! They lead neither ordinary, not yogic, nor any other sort of "life." again, the concept of "life" as we understand won't apply to them. There divine play is Sanatan(without beginning or end, and everlasting). Once in a while, we may get an opportunity, thanks to them being infinitely compassionate towards their bhakts, to witness this sanatan divine play in Maayic realm, and can take benefit from witnessing it if we view it as their bhakt.An event in their life can be interpreted in many ways like we did earlier! People have been doing this since time immemorial, for sure, simply because they have either sattvic, rajas or tamsic intellect. 😊They will definitely do their Karma(action){karma that remains ideal to the humanity}... I'll have to ask you to ponder over the following questions. How can the Lord of Maya do "karm" which is a concept applicable in Maayic realm?? How can someone who is beyond all realms and contains infinite Maayic realms IN HIM do "karm"??? Veds call Shri Ram as Maayadhishvar (Lord of Maya) and declare that while Shri Ram has infinite powers, we will discuss only two, Maaya & Jeev, because that what concerns all Jeevs, whom Veds are addressing. The Vedic concepts of Karm, Karm-phal cycle, Karta being Jeevatma but made out to be Mann, all these require long, and rather confusing for a beginner, explanations. If you could somehow understand it, all I can say here is that please don't mix two entirely separate, & hugely different, concepts of "Karm" & "Divine play" (leela.) If you are still not able to understand, tell me. I'll try to elaborate upon this later.and we interpret it in different ways but we are solely talking about the absolute truth!If there is no Karma done then there will be no point of interpretation!How can we make interpretations for the karma they aren't responsible for? Remember, a person can interpret any event he or she reads or sees or hears about, based on his or her vivek, regardless of whether it is a "karm" by a Maayic Jeev or "divine play" of Shri Bhagwan.
I mean would it be appropriate to create an event or action on our own and give the interpretation!Isn't it something like an insult to such pious dignitaries!Won't the people miss the real life incidents of such Legendary Heroes!