Sleet of Emotional Quivers on RadhaKrishn Love CC#10/DT Nt Pg#41 - Page 114

Originally posted by: August14

Wait what ...they showed Kalyug also? Did they show Kalki avatar or Kali...or did they just mention abt it.

And ya dude these ppl spoil history just for their trp games🙄. I always knew abt Mahabharat and Siya ke Ram having fiction in them...but some stories were true.

I even used to watch Maharana Pratap in childhood but uss mai bhi they added fiction and spoiled it all. I used to watch that show only for Faisal and after he left they made it only abt romance and fake drama. Shehensa Akabar was shown cartoon in that.

No not kalki yet thankfully. They have shown Banke Bihari story which is from Kaliyug.

Ironically they mixed it (and made it a continuation of) with the story of Jalandhar (Shankhchud) which is an event of Satyug

Originally posted by: FlauntPessimism

No not kalki yet thankfully. They have shown Banke Bihari story which is from Kaliyug.

Ironically they mixed it (and made it a continuation of) with the story of Jalandhar (Shankhchud) which is an event of Satyug

Oh God these ppl are gone complete crazy man. Who even believes in this show and the fiction. They are doing complete brainwash of whoever watches it.

I hope they don't show Kalki. Kyunki aaj tak sirf purano mai hi padha gaya hai unke baare mai and if these ppl spoil that too toh phir bohat siyaape hone hai.

I am myself doing research on Lord Kalki ,Kali and Kalyuga since years but without puran I have no proper info. And these ppl won't even bother to research they'll make up their own crap🤔

I cane across a scene from today's episode where Radha asked all the ladies of the family who is more precious to them in their lives. Jamvanti said Sambh and Satyabhama said her family's peace and happiness. I saw some kids on Insta bashing these two for not calling Krishna most precious to them. 😕 It's strange that these little kiddos who find a man and a woman of dwapar yuga indulging in live-in relationship beautiful but still expect the man's wives to love him.

^^^ Twitter fans ki to baat hi useless hai. They just want their favourites should be the center of attraction for everyone and those who don't do it are cheap and worthy of being called

Have not read this completely. But want to know your thoughts about it. Though I myself don't have time to discuss. Personally I think that the article is a bit biased.

https://bodhitv.tv/article/180207b/

Originally posted by: vyapti

Have not read this completely. But want to know your thoughts about it. Though I myself don't have time to discuss. Personally I think that the article is a bit biased.

https://bodhitv.tv/article/180207b/

His philosophy, Adviata Vedanta confronted with Buddhism and it's doctrines systematically and succeeded eliminating the Buddhism from India at that time, in the 8th century.

Originally posted by: Viswasruti

Shankaracharya was an Indian philosopher who consolidated the doctrine of Advaita Vedanta. It is a Hindu philosophy which focuses on Brahman, atman, vidya (knowledge), avidya (ignorance), maya, karma and moksha. It refers to the idea that the soul or Atman is the same as Brahman.

His philosophy, Adviata Vedanta confronted with Buddhism and it's doctrines systematically and succeeded eliminating the Buddhism from India at that time, in the 8th century.

I used to think that Vedanta was from pre Buddha period. Can you elaborate on this?

Originally posted by: vyapti

I used to think that Vedanta was from pre Buddha period. Can you elaborate on this?

Shankara's philosophy is avowedly Vedic. Unlike Buddhists and Jains, he traced his knowledge to the Vedas and submitted to its impersonal authority, which made him a believer (astika).

Adi Shankaracharya’s non-dualist maxim: Jagat mithya, brahma satyam, which means the world, including measured scientific conclusions, that we experience is essentially illusory or rather, mind-dependent epistemological truths. The only mind-independent ontological truth is brahma, variously translated as God, soul, consciousness, language, or the infinitely expanded, eternal, unconditioned mind.

This doctrine of reducing the world to mere illusion, popularly known as maya-vada, enabled Shankara to do something remarkable: unite a land with diverse communities and diverse, seemingly irreconcilable, worldviews – from the Buddhists, the Jain and other religions' pov.

This is a vast subject , he is considered as Political philosopher , a sage with social consciousness.

Originally posted by: vyapti

Have not read this completely. But want to know your thoughts about it. Though I myself don't have time to discuss. Personally I think that the article is a bit biased.

https://bodhitv.tv/article/180207b/

Article is factual mostly but one sided. It is Buddhist sympathetic.

So there is no single mention of the same x similar deeds of rulers who patronized Buddhism.

It was a standard court politics where proponents of 4 religions were trying to gain patronage of rulers and proselytize the state and citizens

Converting one citizen at a time was a very slow process and hence favored method of all 4 religions was to try and convert the ruler and instigate him spread the religion across his state using whatever means he can at the same time weaken and destroy establishment / conclaves/ temples etc of the other.

The four sister religions were Sanatana (Vedic/Pauranic Hinduism). Ajivika (atheism). Jainism and Buddhism.

.

Asoka did not become peaceful after Kalinga. He already was under Buddhist influence through his mother and wife and it had acquired state patronage as soon as he became the ruler. Bindusara was under Ajivika influence. Chadragupta Maurya started Hindu and became. Jain by the time he died. Most ruthless Buddhist ruler who did similar destruction of Hindu believers, their religious saints and temples was Asoka. Chanakya was waning influence by the time Asoka came to power and once he died Buddhism became the state religion. Asoka had already patronized Buddhism as commander of Takshila.

Orissa still has scars of the destruction by Buddhist Asoka

While there had been a steady stream of proselytisers to SriLanka and eastern countries of Jain and Buddhist religion. It was Asoka through his son Mahindra and daughter Sanghamitra neutralised Hindu patronage of Lanka Royalty and converted them to Buddhism.

Now Mahendra and Sanghamitra did not oppress or kill Hindus. They may not even have asked their patron Kings to do it. Within his own kingdom the said King would be a peaceful ruler but the moment he stepped out and conquered another land he would use force to convert. He would destroy their religious icons and any establishment that had power over the masses to stoke rebellion.

Asoka did this. Hindus and Brahmin conclave favoured Sushim. Buddhist supported Asoka. When Asoka came to power he not only killed his brothers he killed his every Brahmin supporter and destroyed Hindu Mathas that could stoke rebellion against him.

So can we now blame the Buddhist supporters of Asoka for the carnage and genocide he caused.

The most important part however that is cOmoletwly wrong in that article is Sankaracharya being responsible for oppression of Buddhists by Hindu King's.

He believed and practiced Ahinsa and preached it. He believed in conversion through dialogues and debates. As did Matha established by him. None of them were built on desecrated Vihara. Neither did these math ever encourage their patron kings do desecration of other religious centres

I will give two example to explain this. Tipu Sultan destroyed and desecrated Numerous temples oF Malabar and killed 100s of Brahmins there.

Maratha attacked to destroy Hindu Sringeri Mutt and guess who Came to its rescue and refurbished it. Same Tipu Sultan as it fell in his protectorate

People are already demanding that Mallika should play the role of Ashta bharyas. I won't be surprised if they actually show that. 🤪

https://twitter.com/initinmgupta/status/1406892276056354818?s=19