Sleet of Emotional Quivers on RadhaKrishn Love CC#10/DT Nt Pg#41 - Page 113

Created

Last reply

Replies

1.1k

Views

53.1k

Users

21

Likes

1.5k

Frequent Posters

August14 thumbnail
4th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

Thanks for your guidance....its not changing though. Looks like I gotta wait until this Newbie tag is gone .

Sutapasima thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

New thread Kohu kya Madhuri

Life_Is_Dutiful thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

So they ruined Goddess Lakshmi's character too. They showed that Alakshmi is Lakshmi's shadow that emerged from Vishnu's feet after she touched his feet. She calls herself Lakshmi's kaali chaya. I don't understand how can they show a Goddess's chaya evil and dark. They also showed Lakshmi a poor helpless abla naari. Then the biggest idiocy, according to this show Mata Sheetala is Lakshmi's form๐Ÿ˜†whereas she was actually Parvati's form.

Life_Is_Dutiful thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

This show makers should seriously remove all the actors except their Sumellika and give different different looks and characters for the two of them to play. ๐Ÿคฃ There's nothing in this show except for Sumedh and Mallika getting different looks. The storyline is utter crap. Those Radha ki Badha tracks were much better and atleast taught us how we should get rid of all our bad qualities. Mallika as Alakshmi literally sucks. Her face is too cute to look evil. Her dialogue delivery is the biggest problem. She already has anglicized hindi accent and now as Alakshmi she speaks hindi in even more anglicized way. ๐Ÿคฃ

Also I feel this show's makers are giving royal ignorance to the senior actors who are playing the roles of Mahadev and Parvati. Recently they had 700 episodes completion party and these two were as usual missing. This is not the first time that these two actors are not seen in show related party. All those youngsters who have hardly anything to do in the show were part of the party but these two who have important roles in the show were as usual missing.

August14 thumbnail
4th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

Hey...I actually wrote one of my favorite RadhaKrishna story on this forum today....would really like if you read it and give me feedback. And please inform me if I can do more of these.

Life_Is_Dutiful thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

Lakshmana addresses Jamvanti as Mata shri but addresses Krishna as Shri Krishna. I wonder if Sumedh asked the makers to not make Lakshmana call him Pitashri or Sasur shri. ๐Ÿ˜†

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: August14

That makes sense...the makers completely ruined the real characters. What were they even thinking that this stupidity would work๐Ÿ˜‚. Anyway this show isn't completely RadhaKrishna focused I guess...like they even showed Ramayan in this and now Alakshmi concept. If only they stuck to the real concept it would have really worked for them.

But to be very honest no mythology shows made these days are completely true. They are way too far from reality. Like Siya ke Ram and Mahabharat of Starplus were beautiful shows and very much near to the truth but still they added their own fiction in between for trps๐Ÿ™„. I would have literally never known what the truth was if I hadn't searched for things myself.

And one last thing could you tell me how can I change my dp on IF. I tried searching for such option but was unable to find one๐Ÿ˜…. I am operating this account from my cell. Can you please guide me here

Star Plus Mahabharatha was anything but true.It was filled with fictional stories


The difference is that is that this show broke the barrier of Time and made the things happening in Satyug, Treta and Kaliyug all happen in Dwapar yug, Krishna does whatever is was by other Vishnu Avtars/roop and obviously these people don't age, instead look the same even after having become grandparents


The show took love angle "na umra ki seema ho na janam ka ho bandhan" way too seriously

FlauntPessimism thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

Originally posted by: Life_Is_Dutiful

Lakshmana addresses Jamvanti as Mata shri but addresses Krishna as Shri Krishna. I wonder if Sumedh asked the makers to not make Lakshmana call him Pitashri or Sasur shri. ๐Ÿ˜†

Maybe because she hates Krishna and doesn't want to keep Him at the same pedestal as her dad (who ironically is Duryodhan ๐Ÿ™„๐Ÿ™„)


I mean if it were for Sumedh even other Krishna children wouldn't have called Him pitashree though Samb does that

August14 thumbnail
4th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 4 years ago

Wait what ...they showed Kalyug also? Did they show Kalki avatar or Kali...or did they just mention abt it.

And ya dude these ppl spoil history just for their trp games๐Ÿ™„. I always knew abt Mahabharat and Siya ke Ram having fiction in them...but some stories were true.

I even used to watch Maharana Pratap in childhood but uss mai bhi they added fiction and spoiled it all. I used to watch that show only for Faisal and after he left they made it only abt romance and fake drama. Shehensa Akabar was shown cartoon in that.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".