Originally posted by: Krishnpriya
So many saints so many theories. I'm quite skeptical about Radhe's existence. Why would the original author not mention her given her prominence in Krishna's life ? That's why i think of her as the symbolic representation of Gopikas' love and a female form of Krishna manifested purely for romantic passtimes. Her going to Dwarika etc sounds a bit dramatic. Krishna was very practical and above worldly attachments. I at times feel bad for Rukmini. In South India, Rukmini and Satyabhama are worshipped alongside Krishna. Rukmini has some prominence in parts of Maharashtra as Ruku/Rakhu Mai as she was the princess of Vidharbha. There is a temple dedicated to Rukmini in Dwarika though they don't get worshipped together for some reason.
Yep that is the most popular theory for Radha.
She never went to Dwarika. Some stories mention their meeting but in Kurukshetra even there I do not remember what the point was. Im guessing Dau brought Nand Yashoda with him.when he came to scold Krishna and Radha tagged along.
But tab bhi Radha had given Ayan ko Dwapar version of divorce and waa independent. Abhi how did Kutila even allow this?
I think I heard somewhere ke Krishna felt guilty/Radha can see him from Vrindavan so theyre not worshipped together. Not sure tho.