Originally posted by: najma123
I don't understand this. :/ I saw the ''exposing'' scene myself. I am NOT a ShaJan fan. In fact, I have even stopped watching after they screwed up Aahil and the fact that KV is leaving. Just clearing... And, I did NOT find it exposing... How is she exposing? Her blouse was covered... In the sense, it wasn't provocative. And, even if it was, I don't see what is vulgar... If people should complain about a married woman not in her senses getting her dori tied by another man because it is vulgar, and because they are promoting this couple, what about Tanveer stripping, Asad and hugging him, and pretend sleeping? What about Sanam 2 doing that with Aahil? Agreed. They were vamps. Who said, Shaad is virtue personified? And WHY should he or anyone on TV be so righteous? In reality, no one is over good or larger than life sort of good... What about Rashid who had two wives? Vulgarity is in thoughts... THAT was vulgar. When a man is 'touched' by someone other than is legally wedded wife, no question of vulgarity arises. WHY for a woman? I am looking at it solely from the point of view of how men and women are looked at... As a woman myself, I find it totally unfair that, men are allowed to have more than one wife, whereas it is considered vulgar if it is shown for women, and that too when she isn't even in her senses... Even Aahil and Asad were unconscious... They shared ''intimate'' moments with people not their legally wedded wife. More so for Aahil... Not Asad directly... Yes. I didn't like it. Because, well, I ship only SaHil... But, it wasn't vulgar.. I apologise if I have offended anyone. :P
Naj, my problem was never the blouse itself or even hooking the blouse and tying the dori! MY problem was, that they were showing a women who had been mislead and THINKS of someone as her genuine partner, being taken advantage of! I don't think Shaad is a bad guy or a pervert or anything! But the truth is he is NOT Sanam/ Jannat's husband! He knows this, she dosent! She is only giving him these liberties coz she thinks they have a close relationship! Any other time, ANY women, married or not, would not ask a strange man do up her blouse! THAT is why I said, they should not show a scene like that and attempt to "Romantisize" it! Becaus that is sending the wrong message!
It is only romantic if they were in a real relationship. But considering they are not, and this women is mislead, it is irresponsible to try to show some sort of "chemistry" type thing, by making this stranger do up her blouse! I objected to the vulgarity of the "intention!". The intention was to put two strangers into a compromising situation together! They were cynically using this opportunity to show something RISKY! Well they were wrong to do that! Because this is not some stort of sleazy show made for cheap thrills! At least I didn't THINK so, but the makers even pushed the envelop on that one!
I went to Forum 32 and I told them, that they need to be a bit more responsible as a lot of impressionable young people watch their show! It is wrong to mislead them into thinking that a women who is allowing a man to touch her because she thinks they are in a relationship, when they are NOT, is romantic! Shaad I an OK guy. But even he knows what he is doing is wrong!
I agree with your statement that a man does NOT need two wives! I also agree it is cheap and unfair! Whatever reason that law was brought in, it is now not used for the same reasons! Now it is only a vehicle for some men to fulfill their lusts in a legal way! Which is wrong! If a women can't have two husband, then a man should NOT be allowed to have two wives! End of story!
Edited by MrDarcyfan - 10 years ago
Kumkum Bhagya
Anupamaa
