Bigg Boss 19 - Daily Discussion Topic - 30th Aug 2025 - WKV
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 30 Aug 2025 EDT
MAIRA KNOWS 30.8
Aneet and Ahaan on the cover of THR!!
Param Sundari opens well
Throw back! When katrina did not take 'gentle' gently from Shah!
Monsoon Magic Micro-fiction Contest Felicitation Ceremony
Cannot decide who is most annoying
Nazar laga hua anda mein nahi khaata
Ijja-jjat hai
Queen 2 Tanu Weds Manu 3 Get Rolling
Trailer - Do You Wanna Partner - Tamannaah Bhatia Diana Penty
Unseen bollywood pics
Yeh Rishta Kya Kehlata Hai - 31 Aug 2025 EDT
Amaal has a message for his Phansss 😇
Vicky says Katrina hates ‘honest feedbacks’ about her acting but…..
Anupamaa completes FIVE Years !! Fifth Anniversary Celebrations
CID episode 75 - 30th August
The Curry-ous Readers 🍛 Book Talk Reading Challenge September 2025
Originally posted by: SylvaniaLUX
You know the best thing about PV characters...people like them do exist in reality...
Prashant like opportunistic, selfish cads who are so self centered they can only think about their comforts, who think its parents duty to provide stuff for children and ergo he is not obligated to reciprocate and be responsible for them in old age..If he does something for anybody its only because he expects something in return.😕Satyendra Dubey ...like a weak man, whose achilles feet is his son... his blood, who will take care of him in his old age ...akhir uska apna khoon hai . ..automatically all his sins are wiped away .😳
I have loved Shobha's character from day 1 and will continue to love her if her character remains the same. However, yesterday's Prashant-Aarti conversation got me thinking about how Prashant was as a son and the Dubeys were as parents?
Being an only son was he always selfish? Could the Dubeys have been at fault for not drawing boundaries for him while growing up ? As a mother, I know the one thing I always tell my kids are that there are always consequences for their actions and they ought to think ten times before they do something. Could they have been at fault for not teaching him to take responsibilities for his actions? Then, as a grown up, when his parents did not agree with the way he has turned out, did Prashant find a means to appease his parents by finding the perfect daughter in law.
When Prashant met Aarti, did he actually fall for her or did he see her as someone through whom he can make his parents proud? Yesterday the way Shobha spoke about Prashant sounded like she always knew he was a selfish person. So then after marriage, because of his selfishness, did he soon realize that he wanted a wife who would wait upon him and not his parents? In his selfishness, did he fail to see what Aarti wanted out of this marriage. That she wanted not just a husband but a father and a mother- a family.
Forming a relationship involves more than one person and breaking them too involves more than one person. I am beginning to feel that the whole Dubey family including Aarti is culpable of this mess:
1) the Dubeys for not instilling the right values in Prashant because these things are instilled from childhood. A person does not wake up one morning and decide to be selfish. It happens when he is not held accountable for his behavior since childhood.
2) Prashant the most culpable for being who he is that is a cad like Sylvania mentioned. Fine, he found someone else to stroke his ego and his own insecurities but there is no justification for not taking responsibility towards Ansh. He didn't have to stay married to Aarti to be a father to Ansh. No matter what his other priorities were, the minute he knew he was going to be a father he needed to make parenting his first and foremost priority.
3) Aarti, I think the only reason I would hold her culpable is maybe for not being able to see through Prashant's selfishness much earlier on.
So, Shobha absolutely loves Aarti but I wonder in a way if she is also trying to compensate for their mistakes with Prashant
There are some things which have been lingering in my mind for some time now, and wanted to point it out here on the thread just for the sake of discussion.
- Why would Aarti's in-laws want to loose their one and only grand-son and give him someone else's surname? I imagine that grand-son would carry forward their heritage name. I feel the script has lacked in showing the bond between Aarti's in laws and her son. I am not saying that they should separate Aarti from her son, but not able to understand their point of view on letting go of Aarti and their one and only grand-son. Also does Aarti's husband know that he has a son?
Originally posted by: shruthi2010
i dont know to give a big analysis but i know that i hate this prashant very much. he just came there to get help from her. the joy and hope in arti's eyes and the crush when he said he loved someone else. he is mad.