somepics of Prithviraj Chauhan

REMIX ROX_APU thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#1
Prithviraj Chauhan and Sanyogta of Kannauj: Fact or Fiction?


Drawing "Wedding Procession" courtesy of Susnatha Poddar and www.indianwargammers.com. By permission. The image is copyright and cannot be reproduced without the artist's permission.


On the face of it, the story of Sanyogta and Prithviraj may seem to have nothing to with the latter's wars and campaigns. But if it is true that Sanyogta's father Jaichand, already a rival of Prithviraj, was angry that she eloped with the Chauhan king, then the bad blood between Chauhan and Rathore is a definite backdrop to the geopolitics of the time. Also, if – as it is said – Prithviraj was so besotted with Sanyogta that he neglected his kingdom to the extent he was oblivious to the danger Mahmud of Gaur presented, then again we can legitimately discuss Sanyogta.



After all, this is no ordinary king we are discussing, but the man who was the last Hindu emperor of Delhi, a man of immense contradictions, and who appears to have lost his empire to the Muslims despite his magnificent warrior qualities because of a lack of diligence and a preference for the good and soft life. So from this angle, too, Sanyogta is important.



The problem is, according to R.C. Majumdar, there is no evidence to back the story. It originates from the Prithviraso, which was written much after the events it narrates.



It's also worth noting that Prithviraj and Sanyogta are supposed to have eloped in 1175. Even given that she was his youngest queen, if 17 years later the man is still so infatuated with her that he cannot think straight, we can legitimately ask if the story is as told. Kings had their favorite wives, but they had many wives. It would be a bit unusual for a wife to have such a hold for so many years that she is the cause of the king's neglecting his duties.



Our difficulty originates with the part concerning Prithviraj's antecedents. The popular story has it that two daughters of Anangpal, King of Delhi, married rival kings: Someshwar Chauhan of Ajmer, and Vijaypal Rathore of Kannauj. Prithviraj was born to Someshwar and his wife Kamladevi, Jaichand was born to Vijaypal and his wife Roopsundari. This would make Prithviraj and Jaichand first cousins, though Jaichand was much older to Prithviraj.



Furthur, Anangpal of Delhi, having no son, decided to leave his kingdom to Prithviraj, because young as Prithviraj was, he was clearly a better soldier than Jaichand. This discrimination by the grandfather in favor of the junior grandson further exacerbated the hostility Jaichand bore Prithviraj.



The problem with this story is several-fold.



First, Prithviraj's mother was not the daughter of the King of Delhi, but of Achalaraja, the Kalachuri king of Tripuri, which is today's Jabbalpore in Madhya Pradesh. Her name was Karpuradevi and not Kamladevi.



Second, Prithviraj inherited the kingdom of Delhi from his father, Someshwar of Ajmer, not from any king of Delhi. Delhi was a vassal of Ajmer, so when Someshwar died, Prithviraj got Delhi as well as Ajmer.



Third, there was no Anangpal ruling Delhi during Prithviraj's time. The closest Anangpal we have been able to locate is the jagirdar of Bhatnar [modern Bhatinda?]. He was a decendent of Bhimpal, last Shahi king of the Punjab – who was disposed of his kingdom by Mahmud Ghaznavi in the 11th century.



Anangpal, according to the story, was an Aruyvaid herbalist doctor who became close friends with Prithviraj. The later liked him so much he added to Anangpal's jagir at Bhatnar, and this inspired Anangpal to attack and recover his lost inheritance of Lahore 1179. However, he could not hold on to Lahore, was pushed out by the Muslims and died. His son Gorakrai was brought back to Bahtnar, and later became a luminary at Prithviraj's court.



Be that as it may, insofar national psyches are shaped by legends, the story of Prithviraj and Sanyogta is one of the most powerful of Indian legends. For Indians, the romance is on par with the most famous of all Western civilization romances, Paris and Helen of Troy. So while as historians we must remain skeptical, as Indians we should remain free to enjoy the story.

Created

Last reply

Replies

14

Views

3.3k

Users

9

Frequent Posters

REMIX ROX_APU thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#2
Prithviraj Chauhan versus Jaichand Rathore: the Fatal Quarrel
Quote from: http://www.khannamohyals.com/7clans-2520vaid.htm


Raja Jai Chand convened his famous Rajsu Yajna at Kannauj in 1191 with the object of expelling the Muslims from India. Prithviraj was a special invitee to this function, which was attended by many ruling chiefs of the period. Its seven eminent men represented the Mohyal community, one from each caste of its constellation. They were: Gorakh Rai Vaid, Rai Tirlok Nath Bali, Rai Midder Dev Datt, Rai Narsing Dev Chhibber, Rai Takhan Dev Mohan, Rai Inder Sain Lau and Rai Kailash Dev Bhimwal.



However, the ill-fated convention failed to achieve its goal due to the clash of Prithviraj and Jai Chand whose old rivalries came to the surface over-riding national interests. Prithviraj had abducted Sanyogta, Jai Chand's daughter, from a crowded Swyambar. When he ascended to the throne of Delhi, Jai Chand refused to recognize him as a sovereign and made a rival claim. This breach occurred at a crucial time when a series of invasions of Mohammed Ghori were looming in he horizon. Ghori had captured the empire of Mahmud Ghazni after his death and was now poised with the same devilish designs to conquer India.

REMIX ROX_APU thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#3
The Chauhans of Ranthambhore


They represent a collateral branch of the Chauhans of Ajmer, and came into their own after the death of Prithviraj III after Second Tarain, 1193.



The dynasty's founder, Govindaraja, was banished from Prithviraj III's court at Ajmer and settled at Ranthambhore. His descendents were:



Govindaraja
Balahara, son of Govindaraja
Prahlada, son of Balahara
Viranarayan, son of Prahlada
Vagbhata, son of Balahara
Jaitrashsimha, son of Vagbhata
Hammira [Hammirdeva], son of Jaithrashsimha.


Of the dynasty, Hammirdeva was the most famous.
jatt1234 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#4
coool i have read this before all though it was ages ago

thnx agen

althoughi would still prefer to believe the sagars version... 😉
REMIX ROX_APU thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#5
256747 thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#6
YA, 😳 😳 a,same heree...Historians ALWAYSSS specualate...That's their JOB?! But yaa...NO-ONEE KNOWSSwhat the truth is..NO-ONEE EVERRR WILLL...I JUST WANT TO BELIEVEE & DREAM ABOUT THE SAGARS' VERSION OF HISTORY 😳
Edited by lime ice - 18 years ago
ching thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#7
thank for everything 😛

CHing 😃
Edited by ching - 18 years ago
kudiya thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#8
thanks for the information...........but I prefer to believe Sagar's version as this is the one which brings us close to our PRC
kritical_kritix thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#9
thanx. but dunno when the time machine will be invented. then we'll know what the real truth is
merry911 thumbnail
18th Anniversary Thumbnail Explorer Thumbnail
Posted: 18 years ago
#10

After all, this is no ordinary king we are discussing, but the man who was the last Hindu emperor of Delhi, a man of immense contradictions, and who appears to have lost his empire to the Muslims despite his magnificent warrior qualities because of a lack of diligence and a preference for the good and soft life. So from this angle, too, Sanyogta is important.



The problem is, according to R.C. Majumdar, there is no evidence to back the story. It originates from the Prithviraso, which was written much after the events it narrates. I have a confusion if raso is written by Chandra Bardai then could it be written years after.??



It's also worth noting that Prithviraj and Sanyogta are supposed to have eloped in 1175. I read somewhere it was in 1185.
Even given that she was his youngest queen, if 17 years later Prithvi succeeded the throne when he was 13 yr old in 1179 and ruled for 13yrs. How could he be married for 17yrs.
the man is still so infatuated with her that he cannot think straight, we can legitimately ask if the story is as told. Kings had their favorite wives, but they had many wives. It would be a bit unusual for a wife to have such a hold for so many years that she is the cause of the king's neglecting his duties.

There is lot confusion in the story.


Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".