If Pratigya wasn't present - Page 2

Created

Last reply

Replies

26

Views

2.6k

Users

13

Likes

114

Frequent Posters

a_uma thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#11
All his life Krishna has been conditioned by the behaviour of his father and brother, for him beating up the womenfolk of the house is as common as any other domestic chore......
also since he is uneducated, he never got alternate inputs from any other source.....

It was only when he married Prats he saw a diff aspect of family life (saxsenas)......
moreover, he saw a diff type of woman.... Pratigya..... educated, bold, honest, righteous.....


I would give him the benefit of doubt.....it is not easy to change a lifelong mindset overnight....
but he is getting there with Prats help.....and it is not proper to compare Kesar and Pratigya in Krishna's POV.... for him Kesar is just his bro's wife, he has just a distant affection for her...
whereas Prats is the love of his life... he would do anything for her..... he would obviously react differently if Prats was being harmed.....
carisma2 thumbnail
19th Anniversary Thumbnail Visit Streak 365 Thumbnail + 8
Posted: 15 years ago
#12
i think that he has not gone to see her because he is ashamed deep down inside of what his mum and brother have done.
Alwayshopeful thumbnail
15th Anniversary Thumbnail Dazzler Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#13

Thank you. I usually do not post much on this forum (apart from the last few days) because I treat primetime Hindi serials as entertainment packages and not as mirrors or solutions of societal evils. I rely on independent documentaries or literary exposes for that.

But saying that, I am a bit perplexed by the condemnations being heaped on Pratigya with such choice epithets for an action, which if it were to happen in real life, would have found a front-page feature on newspapers and encomiums from all social organizations and common people. I was reading in the newspaper about the story of an ordinary housewife whose husband had been kidnapped by UP dacoits. She gathered her jewelry and went and visited the dacoits all by herself in the deep forests and convinced them to free her husband. If such an action was shown in Pratigya I am sure she would have been denigrated as fool-hardy and impractical. My point is why watch a fictitious serial to see plebian events and foregone outcomes. Why is Krishna's character quirks and shortcomings explained away blithely by " he was brought up in such circumstances.. he doesn't know better" but lambast Pratigya's character for being true to her upbringing and life lessons imparted by her family? Why is Krishna hailed as some icon of pragmatism and Pratigya lampooned for unrealistic idealism? Was bringing an educated, head-strong, modern girl as a wife to a den of uncultured beasts and leaving her at their mercy for hours, and even days, an act of pragmatism? Was openly antagonizing his parents on behalf of Pratigya and then expecting them to treat her with kid's gloves an act of pragmatism? Was the act of living under the same roof as his family who had openly blackened his wife's and her dad's face and spoken un-tempered words of hatred and not finding any alternatives solution to this living situation impasse an act of pragmatism? Even in the present situation, as much as his state is evoking so much sympathy, I feel he is just feeling hemmed in by everyone's expectations and wants to go back to romancing his wife and sweep all the unpleasant truths begging him to let go of his cloak of inaction and apathy under the rug.

I feel that Krishna's character has been shown to unwilling in dealing with harsh realities and uncomfortable home truths of life. Just like he refused to acknowledge in the beginning that Prats didn't love her, similarly he refuses to face the ugly truth about his family members. And to me, that doesn't seem like a trait of a pragmatic man.

I have become a fan of your posts ReldašŸ‘šŸ‘šŸ‘šŸ‘šŸ‘...Please do keep writing....
Relda thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#14

Originally posted by: a_uma

All his life Krishna has been conditioned by the behaviour of his father and brother, for him beating up the womenfolk of the house is as common as any other domestic chore......
also since he is uneducated, he never got alternate inputs from any other source.....

It was only when he married Prats he saw a diff aspect of family life (saxsenas)......
moreover, he saw a diff type of woman.... Pratigya..... educated, bold, honest, righteous.....


I would give him the benefit of doubt.....it is not easy to change a lifelong mindset overnight....
but he is getting there with Prats help.....and it is not proper to compare Kesar and Pratigya in Krishna's POV.... for him Kesar is just his bro's wife, he has just a distant affection for her...
whereas Prats is the love of his life... he would do anything for her..... he would obviously react differently if Prats was being harmed.....

The way I feel is that compassion and empathy for suffering human beings is an innate, indelible characteristic , not imparted by formal education or surrounding set-ups. You either have the milk of human kindness flowing through your veins or you are immured against all sights and sounds that beseech your sympathy and understanding as a fellow human being. Kesar might be a distant relative but he is dispassionate about even his own mother being thrashed regularly. Even if he had grown up in this barbaric household as a witness to all the atrocities being meted out to the womenfolk, he is an adult now. If he were so pragmatic as people are saying he is does that mean that he has to strip himself bare of any vestige of human compassion? It is not a zero-sum game that you can either stand with the victim and forget about everyone else or you completely ignore the victim's sufferings and worry only about the immediate legal predicaments.
a_uma thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#15

Originally posted by: Relda

The way I feel is that compassion and empathy for suffering human beings is an innate, indelible characteristic , not imparted by formal education or surrounding set-ups. You either have the milk of human kindness flowing through your veins or you are immured against all sights and sounds that beseech your sympathy and understanding as a fellow human being. Kesar might be a distant relative but he is dispassionate about even his own mother being thrashed regularly. Even if he had grown up in this barbaric household as a witness to all the atrocities being meted out to the womenfolk, he is an adult now. If he were so pragmatic as people are saying he is does that mean that he has to strip himself bare of any vestige of human compassion? It is not a zero-sum game that you can either stand with the victim and forget about everyone else or you completely ignore the victim's sufferings and worry only about the immediate legal predicaments.



Behaviour IS based on culture and conditioning..... everyone has human kindness and compassion in varying degrees...... people sympathise with starving children in Africa but how many actually do something about it ???

In Afghanistan women go about covered from head to toe, they cannot be educated, they have no property, they cannot even go outside the house without a male member of the family.....
the same things would cause horrified reactions in India or the West.....

you see, it IS a matter of culture and conditioning...... the people in Afghanistan may know that injustice is being done to their women and sympathise, but who will protest, who will go against the tide ????
Which is why in this particular instance I gave Krishna the benefit of doubt....
Edited by a_uma - 15 years ago
Dyehard thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#16

Originally posted by: dhakarn

excellent post...............šŸ‘šŸ‘šŸ‘.i too was a bit uneasy that krishna just doesn't care about kesar...........but its his nature......the only persons he care about in the whole world is pratigya and his bauji.........see he is more concerned about his bauji's pride than his mother's sufferings......even if he cares for his mother it is because she is sajjan singh's patni........just my POV..........we r giong to see his complete u trun against his family only and only if when he comes to know that pratigya is in some trouble.......if not for her he just won't care who lives or who dies......he only has stood for the cause of good when pratigya or her family was in trouble.........and he thinks it is only his right to do anything to pratigya....like hw he defends her in front of the world but fights or bashes her once inside the privacy of his room..................but having said that, i would like to add that i still love krishna......😳



Of course we all love krishna, that is why we are ambitious for him! šŸ˜› Are you satisfied with a Krishna who cannot make tough choices or are we hoping for him to realise his full potential?


Relda thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#17

Originally posted by: a_uma



Behaviour IS based on culture and conditioning..... everyone has human kindness and compassion in varying degrees...... people sympathise with starving children in Africa but how many actually do something about it ???

In Afghanistan women go about covered from head to toe, they cannot be educated, they have no property, they cannot even go outside the house without a male member of the family.....
the same things would cause horrified reactions in India or the West.....

you see, it IS a matter of culture and conditioning...... the people in Afghanistan may know that injustice is being done to their women and sympathise, but who will protest, who will go against the tide ????

Thanks for your seasoned and considerate reply. I am always scared to post anything which might seem like a Krishna criticism on these boards.
Yes, of course I agree that most people go with the flow, being conditiond by their upbringing and societal mores and do not like to be an iconoclast in trying to change the way things are.
But, I am not talking about taking on the society and trying to change its customs and rules. I am talking about compassion for a famiy member who has suffered the most horrific and brutal assault and who is right now all alone and desperate, without any support or strength from any one else other than Pratigya. I mean Krishna was more concerned about Piyassia after the electrocution episode than about Kesar right now. I find it glaringly disconcerting that Kesar's well-being is practically non-existent in his list of priorities. Just a quiet, sympathetic visit to her without delving into the FIR and blame game issues would have been more in keeping with a character who is the purported "hero" of a show.
Just my views..please no offence.
a_uma thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Rocker Thumbnail Commentator Level 1 Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#18

Originally posted by: Relda

Thanks for your seasoned and considerate reply. I am always scared to post anything which might seem like a Krishna criticism on these boards.

Yes, of course I agree that most people go with the flow, being conditiond by their upbringing and societal mores and do not like to be an iconoclast in trying to change the way things are.
But, I am not talking about taking on the society and trying to change its customs and rules. I am talking about compassion for a famiy member who has suffered the most horrific and brutal assault and who is right now all alone and desperate, without any support or strength from any one else other than Pratigya. I mean Krishna was more concerned about Piyassia after the electrocution episode than about Kesar right now. I find it glaringly disconcerting that Kesar's well-being is practically non-existent in his list of priorities. Just a quiet, sympathetic visit to her without delving into the FIR and blame game issues would have been more in keeping with a character who is the purported "hero" of a show.
Just my views..please no offence.


Hey, there is no offence in posting a different POV.... every opinion is welcome.....šŸ˜›
Yes, I do agree with u that Krishna could hv shown more sympathy to Kesar, keeping the issue of the FIR aside...... however I feel that he (and the CVs) were more distracted by Amma's histrionics....
Dyehard thumbnail
16th Anniversary Thumbnail Navigator Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#19

Originally posted by: a_uma



Behaviour IS based on culture and conditioning..... everyone has human kindness and compassion in varying degrees...... people sympathise with starving children in Africa but how many actually do something about it ???

In Afghanistan women go about covered from head to toe, they cannot be educated, they have no property, they cannot even go outside the house without a male member of the family.....
the same things would cause horrified reactions in India or the West.....

you see, it IS a matter of culture and conditioning...... the people in Afghanistan may know that injustice is being done to their women and sympathise, but who will protest, who will go against the tide ????
Which is why in this particular instance I gave Krishna the benefit of doubt....



Uma, Relda, my take is that by doing a Pratigya vs Krishna reading we are losing the plot . Yes, there is resistance on Krishna's part to be won over to the right side, (P's side is undoubtedly the right side, no two ways about that) but it is the resistance of deep conditioning. It is this attrition that is the greatest charm of the show.
Unless, K who is a product of his entire context and conditioning is shown to change at every level, in his beliefs and his attitudes, how are they ever going to ever show the triumph of goodness? Sending a few baddies to jail is really not as satisfying to watch as the unfurling of a golden heart. It has unfurled for Pratigya, now it will unfurl for goodness, righteousness and justice. All in good time, though!šŸ˜‰

And Relda, the milk flows, it does. Just give him the time to eliminate the poison from the Ksheerasagara! Manthan karne mein tho samay lagta hai na? Our Baba will hold it in his Kanth and realise only the purest exilir! Faith, ye deare ones!

Relda thumbnail
17th Anniversary Thumbnail Voyager Thumbnail
Posted: 15 years ago
#20

Originally posted by: Dyehard



Uma, Relda, my take is that by doing a Pratigya vs Krishna reading we are losing the plot . Yes, there is resistance on Krishna's part to be won over to the right side, (P's side is undoubtedly the right side, no two ways about that) but it is the resistance of deep conditioning. It is this attrition that is the greatest charm of the show.
Unless, K who is a product of his entire context and conditioning is shown to change at every level, in his beliefs and his attitudes, how are they ever going to ever show the triumph of goodness? Sending a few baddies to jail is really not as satisfying to watch as the unfurling of a golden heart. It has unfurled for Pratigya, now it will unfurl for goodness, righteousness and justice. All in good time, though!šŸ˜‰

And Relda, the milk flows, it does. Just give him the time to eliminate the poison from the Ksheerasagara! Manthan karne mein tho samay lagta hai na? Our Baba will hold it in his Kanth and realise only the purest exilir! Faith, ye deare ones!

Hi Dyehard,
Your apprehensions of losing the big picture is valid. But I would posit that the plot has already been lost, at least in these forums. Everything Pratigya does will be seen through the lens of her relationship with Krishna. Leaving the irritating details like she didn't call the police in the first pace and hr desperate attempts to reach Krishna were unsucessful because Krishna was literally letting the grass grow under his feet and playing mental love games, Pratigya's actions are somehow being depicted as an action of disrespect, slight and disregard for Krishna. If we accept that her actions of not consulting Krishna was disrespectful then was Krishna disrespectful when he decided to take on Angad and his gang on Arushi's behalf without Pratigya's knowledge and then left her to burn in the fire and brimstone of amma's wrath?
My point is that sometimes situations go out of hand and you end up doing things which appear to be prudent and exigent at that time.. it has nothing to do with the balance of love and respect in a marriage. Marriage is not a ledgerbook where you keep checks and balances on who is winning and who is losing. If she wanted to put the SS's family to shame and disrepute she could have done it much earlier when Amma had inflicted verbal and physical abuse on her.
The points of my posts in this thread was not to disparage Krishna at the expense of Pratigya's character but to put forward the view that both Krishna and Pratigya are human beings with normal human faults and follies. Pratigya is not an one-dimensional character for whom no sympathy can be accorded and neither is Krishna an irreproachable, blemishless character whose every action is worthy of claps and praises.

Related Topics

Top

Stay Connected with IndiaForums!

Be the first to know about the latest news, updates, and exclusive content.

Add to Home Screen!

Install this web app on your iPhone for the best experience. It's easy, just tap and then "Add to Home Screen".