Originally posted by: Relda
The way I feel is that compassion and empathy for suffering human beings is an innate, indelible characteristic , not imparted by formal education or surrounding set-ups. You either have the milk of human kindness flowing through your veins or you are immured against all sights and sounds that beseech your sympathy and understanding as a fellow human being. Kesar might be a distant relative but he is dispassionate about even his own mother being thrashed regularly. Even if he had grown up in this barbaric household as a witness to all the atrocities being meted out to the womenfolk, he is an adult now. If he were so pragmatic as people are saying he is does that mean that he has to strip himself bare of any vestige of human compassion? It is not a zero-sum game that you can either stand with the victim and forget about everyone else or you completely ignore the victim's sufferings and worry only about the immediate legal predicaments.
Behaviour IS based on culture and conditioning..... everyone has human kindness and compassion in varying degrees...... people sympathise with starving children in Africa but how many actually do something about it ???
In Afghanistan women go about covered from head to toe, they cannot be educated, they have no property, they cannot even go outside the house without a male member of the family.....
the same things would cause horrified reactions in India or the West.....
you see, it IS a matter of culture and conditioning...... the people in Afghanistan may know that injustice is being done to their women and sympathise, but who will protest, who will go against the tide ????
Which is why in this particular instance I gave Krishna the benefit of doubt....
Edited by a_uma - 15 years ago