Sinister and Stupid Strategies - Page 5

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Purely ur opinion if u think it is a false argument. Komal had no choice in the matter , Thakurs dont give women choice to decide their marraiges , their marraiges r decided by fathers and brothers although she was given latitude regarding other things as a way of pampering by SS . The argument is not whether SS cud stop Komals marraige .........ur missing the point as usual . I am not even going into that part .........that Krishna had slit his wrists , made SS helpless due to his Pratigya craze and then Guruma had butted in , showing SS that use this marraige to ur advantage . The argument is that much before SS Pratigya cud have stopped it and she DID NOT . I always say in all my posts that SS is a wrong man period . I dont expect much from him as he is the villain in the show . in my eyes

Krishna promising Komal to Adarsh was way out of line as it was SS ;s decision , not Krishnas to make ......he had no right to take this decision alone

SS listening to Guruma and saying yes was wrong as he placed election winning and personal goals over daughter

Pratigya not putting her foot down after listening to Adarshs strategy and saying I dont want this marraige with these stakes , either I go in it ALONE or not at all , was absolutely unacceptable as two lives were involved .

Let us agree to disagree here too optimist .

My dear sweet Kools, I agreed to all your posts where the facts weren't presented in a misleading and twisted manner. 😊

If you have access to the episode 22 to 30, you will find your answers. Pratigya did asked Adrash to change his mind on marring Komal. By the time Pratigya, SS and Guruma got involved, Krishna had already given his words to Adarsh. And the way krishna was portrayed those days, it is just plain wrong to think that Pratigya alone could have stopped Komal marring Ardash.

Now I wud say False argument , optimist and of course it wud be purely my opinion .

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Now I wud say False argument , optimist and of course it wud be purely my opinion .

Krishna had backed off when shagun was refused , it was Prat s who went to the adda saying Ill marry u . She has guts , I acknowledge that . When a gun was held to her head and she was warned by Krishna chupchaap u come in the house , dont do nataks , just apologise , STILL she said NO i wont . That clinched it for me.....this woman has guts and she is unafraid of Krishna. She cud have easily said NO Im not marrying too .

Lets agree to diasaggree here , its endless .Ill never accept this fact that Pratigya is aFRAID . She is not afgraid of anything , she has proved it .Not even of gundas .

What you think would have been the alternate option for Pratigya for this story to begin. This was the central Idea if you could read the show synopsis once again.

Originally posted by: SAM2U

What you think would have been the alternate option for Pratigya for this story to begin. This was the central Idea if you could read the show synopsis once again.

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

I agree with u on this one .And it proves my point that while taking a decision she made a mistake too . She took a thoughtless decision is my point .U say that U agree upto the point the story is not twisted by me ..........what u feel is twisting of story is actually a different POV of seeing the same story ............that we have . For instance many see her decision to save her family by marrying Krishna as brave and noble .I see it as thoughtless . Her decision of teaching him a lesson.......I see it as stupidly dangerous . Her actions of slapping gundas .........I see as foolhardy . U guys see it as something heroic . So while i accept the premise that she saying yes to this marraige was essential to the storyline , I dont see why we shud accept her as a WHITE heroine and not a grey one .I find her as grey as Krishna............and as flawed as him . Krishna is a grey , flawed hero . So is She is grey , flawed heroine . The only difference is in our personal taste .....I find Krishna interesting and Pratigya uninteresting . It is all a matter of prespective optimist , no one is twisting facts here .

Did I ever said that Pratigya is all white, never. The only problem with your post, though mostly i admire, is that you look at Pratigya's character from a very biased angle. Meaning the actions of all other characters had nothing to do with the decision she took to marry krishna.😕

Originally posted by: SAM2U

Did I ever said that Pratigya is all white, never. The only problem with your post, though mostly i admire, is that you look at Pratigya's character from a very biased angle. Meaning the actions of all other characters had nothing to do with the decision she took to marry krishna.😕

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Even if she did take the decision due to the actions of other characters ............it is hardly a sensible decision . To obliterate the badnaami , to stop the terror of her younger sis , to stop her bro from murdering a gunda one does nOT marry the man she thought was her stalker , period . It was sheer luck wasnt it that her stalker had a conscience . Imagine what her life wud have been if she had married Angad . As it is things turned out rather ok for her ..........The stalker turned out to be wealthy , of a higher caste , and not so bad although he was illiterate .In fact he rather supported her on every issue she made . The only problem she encountered was that the stalker's house was rather chauvinistic and old fashioned in its ideas regarding the status of women . Well , no household is perfect . But even there , The stalker did not really allow her to get burnt in the fire of chauvinism , he protected her from his family whenever he cud . So all in all she got off pretty easily due to her good luck , but i dont see HER accomplishing anything on her OWN . So she gets no admiration from me . The only time I liked her was when she accepted Tunnas moms sari and allowed them to call her Bhabhima. She came close to being human then .I also like her dealing with Kesar . I ALSO like her not bothering to reply AMMA back ever . { Amma is useless and bitchy ] . Not just that optimist I rather like it how she is ok with Komal and doesnt complain about her rudeness to Krishna. She shows some maturity there , I admit that . What puts me off majorly is her arrogant way of dealing with Krishna and the total disrespect she shows him , not as a wife but also as a human being . The way she puts him down in front of Arushi and her family members . The Layak dialogues . I get totally put off there .

So u see optimist , I am not THAT biased .😊

See the story was built around this wrong decision by Pratigya agreed, She never loved him and her perception of krishna never changed until the Anagd truth came out, hence her behavior towards krishna makes sense to me. The moment she found out the truth she admitted that she was unfair to krishna and she could no more hate him cause the reasons for hating him had her repenting somehow. Her attitude has remarkably changed towards krishna though she is still apprehensive of his forceful ways. The warmth and closeness that every one is expected form her as a wife in true sense gets so many roadblocks and events that is keeping them apart from becoming a normal husband and wife.