CAn't tolerate Pratigya Now..

First Previous

Page

Next Last

Frequent Posters

Sweet-Violet

@Sweet-Violet

Rocker

Posted: 15 years ago

#51

Originally posted by: MERARAI

Do marriage and revenge even belong in the same sentence ever? She has made a mockery of her sanskaars she takes so much pride in, by marrying for revenge. How is that not disrespectful her principles by going through the rituals and the lies her oath were in her mind during her wedding? She has no relationship with her sasural without first a relationship with her spouse. Without that she is just a free maid service available to the Tacurse, She makes the meals, makes the bed, brings him tea, serves the meals, collects the achaar from the terrace. All these tasks can be performed by a butler for a few hundred rupees a month and the Tacurse can well afford it. There is no need for a bahu in name only in the household who causes grief to the family members bec' of the way she treats their laadla, Baba.

Its just a TV show, not real life. Most of the TV shows make a mockery of marriage in some way or the other, so nothing special or new here. There is no match between Pratigya and Krishna but they are destined to be together. In most cases, a girl and boy fall in love and then get married. Here its the opposite, they made them get married first and then start their love story. So lets see how Krishna woos his ladylove in-spite so many hurdles. Like I said before, he needs to be gentle and caring, earn her respect and love. 😃

Edited by --Anu-- - 15 years ago

Quote

Rachna

@Chaccha

Dazzler

Posted: 15 years ago

#52

Originally posted by: MERARAI

Do marriage and revenge even belong in the same sentence ever? She has made a mockery of her sanskaars she takes so much pride in, by marrying for revenge. How is that not disrespectful her principles by going through the rituals and the lies her oath were in her mind during her wedding? She has no relationship with her sasural without first a relationship with her spouse.
No, they don't belong in one sentence. Pratigya married him on the sole purpose of teaching him a lesson, but the marriage itself wasn't a joke. She didn't marry him so that she could eventually dirvorce him after he "learned" the lesson. IMO, she would've stayed married for him forever if things were bearable, but sadly, that wasn't the case. The oaths also tell the husband to protect his wife under all circumstances---that means protecting her even from himself if he is the immediate threat to her. Instead, what Krishna did was harm her mentally, physically and emotionally. It is a two-way street.

Without that she is just a free maid service available to the Tacurse, She makes the meals, makes the bed, brings him tea, serves the meals, collects the achaar from the terrace. All these tasks can be performed by a butler for a few hundred rupees a month and the Tacurse can well afford it. There is no need for a bahu in name only in the household who causes grief to the family members bec' of the way she treats their laadla, Baba. For sure she did all that a butler can do, but she was not a butler for that family. She was more than that and definately not a trophy DIL. From what I remember, she barely talked to Krishna to avoid any kind of confrontation. Even that was considered "insulting" by some. 😕😕

Quote

Looks like you are new here. Register for free, learn and contribute.

Areej

@Shezaadi

Inactive

Posted: 15 years ago

#53

woww it is soo alarming and frightening to see the number of posts against Pratigya!

is it really believed that the thakurs would forget everything and let her live in the house peacefully if she had simply apologized? Pratigya is repeatedly put in situations where she is pressured to surrender herself to the authority of men but instead she chooses to fight for herself and her rights as a woman. We should support pratigya for her brave attempts and if we can't do that then at least not bash her.

I know it's only a t.v. show and fictitious but Pratigya's character represents so much more! She is the voice of the numerous unfortunate women who endure the pain caused by so called 'men' who view women as inferior.

This show presents a female lead who is truly strong and refuses to silently endure injustices from her husband or his family just because she is a woman and it is considered her duty.

Before blindly supporting krishna and overlooking his faults and putting all the blame on pratigya, we should put ourselves in pratigya's place.

Personally, it would become very difficult for me to respect and love a man who would make me endure any sort of force, regardless of how much he says he loves me. Love, no matter how great, becomes suffocating and disgusting when put in situations of abuse and force and it should never be used as a valid justification for these horrid acts to take place.

Edited by Shezaadi - 15 years ago

Quote

167495

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#54

Originally posted by: MERARAI

Do marriage and revenge even belong in the same sentence ever? She has made a mockery of her sanskaars she takes so much pride in, by marrying for revenge. How is that not disrespectful her principles by going through the rituals and the lies her oath were in her mind during her wedding? She has no relationship with her sasural without first a relationship with her spouse. Without that she is just a free maid service available to the Tacurse, She makes the meals, makes the bed, brings him tea, serves the meals, collects the achaar from the terrace. All these tasks can be performed by a butler for a few hundred rupees a month and the Tacurse can well afford it. There is no need for a bahu in name only in the household who causes grief to the family members bec' of the way she treats their laadla, Baba.

exactly pratigya has her faults! i dun understand y she married him

Quote

koolsadhu1000

@koolsadhu1000

Stunner

+ 3

Posted: 15 years ago

#55

rightchoice

I agree with your views totally .

If she did not want to give hundred percent to the marraige why did she marry ?

For the family is a lame excuse ........is the same family not in danger anymore now that she has openly taken panga with the Thakurs ?What does she have to protect them now except the sindoor in her maang that Krishna put ? That means ultimately she is doing all this bravado on the basis of Krishna tolerating her conditions , attitude , rudeness right ? Was there any guarantee that he wud be one to tolerate her ?Had he turned out to be Shakti she wud have very little choice in this matter and wud not have been able to protect her family at all . Her family wud perhaps be saluting Shakti when he walked the roads .

It is a bitter truth of life that one takes advantage of someone who loves unconditionally . One starts taking him for granted and thats what Pratigya is clearly doing .Its not her fault really , it is Krishnas fault for cheapening himself so much by constantly running after her .

She finds no problem in marrying to take revenge , and her sanskaari bro has no problem harassing Komal as Tit For Tat simply to go to the Thakurs level and teach them a thing or two , forgetting that Komal is a human being . We clearly see Adarsh talking about this when marraiges r arranged . Both the bro sis duo married for revenge . The fact that they had NO CHOICE is a laugh coz today even at gunpoint Pratigya shows immense courage and is unafraid .And Hence I said Selective courage , selective memory .Of course this courage will desert her when she encounters the likes of Angad who r unscrupulous . The professor's courage has already desrted him and he has aLREADY changed his tune saying KRISHNA AAKHIR USKA PATI HAI . Just in one day , mind u .

The truth is they r hypocrites . If the Thakurs r chauvinists , the Saxenas r hypocrites and the MEL JOL of these two families is highly entertaining . Personally if u ask me , the chauvinists r better as they dont pretend .The Hypocrites say one thing , do another and THINK another .

And yeah . Pratigya told truth at pooja coz she NEVER lies is a laugh ......she lies very well , we have seen her past . Also Pratigya Respects the holy fire is another load of rubbish as we saw how she did not respect the holy fire where she promised to give her hundred percent to her husband in marraige .Same way , Pratigya was Afraid to tell the truth coz Krishna forced her is another rubbishy lie as we dont see her afraid at all today , we see her unfazed and brazen .

Quote

Divya

@dkmystery

Stunner

+ 4

Posted: 15 years ago

#56

really yar! Krishna should just divorce her, she is soooooooo bad
does he have the guts to do this? 😆

Quote

167495

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#57

yeh but there is no reason to bash pratigya up i think she did the right thing by not appologising!

Quote

CanadianAddict

@CanadianAddict

Voyager

+ 2

Posted: 15 years ago

#58

Pratigya should not apologize, at the end of the day, none of them really care about each others families or their sentiments. Krishna didn't care as he kept humiliating her family in front of everyone pre-marriage, and obviously Pratigya doesn't care enough to apologize.

But in the matter of apologizing she had done nothing wrong, she doesn't want to- shes taking a stand and its perfectly fine. If Krishna apologized, he apologized without understanding his mistake (which if he had, he wouldn't march in to her house with a gun and drag her back to the SS mansion.) Pratigya has slapped him before, yes, and I agree it was wrong to slap him- but her reason, well I think him marching in to a private engagement ceremony and making a huge tamasha out of it all, evading her families and her right to privacy, well I would slap him too.!

He slapped her for telling the truth, and what was so wrong with that? Because she could no longer support his lie? Well woop di doo, that seems like a good enough reason for someone people to make it an even playing field. When it clearly isn't.

Quote

AqUaMaRiN

@AqUaMaRiN

Voyager

Posted: 15 years ago

#59

Originally posted by: koolsadhu1000

Dear limits

I respectfully disagree with u on ALL points and I think we must agree to disagree here as u urself have mentioned that you do not understand my points . As far as my 'colorful imaginations' and 'vibrant imaginations' go I really feel we can do without these kind of personal remarks and stick only to the discussion of the show and characters . That said , I see no point in discussing on this topic with u as our view points are diametrically opposite and i see no middle ground .😊

Hello Koolsadhu1000!

I agree with u to disagree with each other, 😆 And I was expressing my thoughts based on urs and in no way was trying to change ur views or impose mine on u!!! And I never really expected for u to discuss but was just relieving my thoughts that were knocking hard on my poor head!!!😆

And about the imaginations, believe it or not, I meant it as a compliment coz, u must have read how I compared it with the exact opposite and common ones and NO body, well not nyone's comment that I came upon could've thought of such possibilities as urs...So, it was meant as a compliment to have been thought of something unique!!! And later when I expressed my shock, that too was being serious and genuine and NOT sarcastic...

Well, since u felt like me was being personal, it was my bad to have gotten carried away while getting rid of my head-ache... I totally agree about keeping the discussion to the characters and show and will definitely be careful next time to keep my colorful thoughts in check!!!😆 Hope u understand!!!

Edited by limits - 15 years ago

Quote

167495

Suspended

Posted: 15 years ago

#60

Originally posted by: CanadianAddict
Pratigya should not apologize, at the end of the day, none of them really care about each others families or their sentiments. Krishna didn't care as he kept humiliating her family in front of everyone pre-marriage, and obviously Pratigya doesn't care enough to apologize.

But in the matter of apologizing she had done nothing wrong, she doesn't want to- shes taking a stand and its perfectly fine. If Krishna apologized, he apologized without understanding his mistake (which if he had, he wouldn't march in to her house with a gun and drag her back to the SS mansion.) Pratigya has slapped him before, yes, and I agree it was wrong to slap him- but her reason, well I think him marching in to a private engagement ceremony and making a huge tamasha out of it all, evading her families and her right to privacy, well I would slap him too.!

He slapped her for telling the truth, and what was so wrong with that? Because she could no longer support his lie? Well woop di doo, that seems like a good enough reason for someone people to make it an even playing field. When it clearly isn't.

by the way the other time u went on and on about civil rights and just now i found out that pratigya has also slapped krishna in the past