Psychological analysis of Krishna's character - Page 10

@ Kaash, no dear i'm not angry lol i just get fired up when the topic is based on Kripa.

Yes Oedipus complex was beyond me.

Originally posted by: CanadianAddict

Yes Oedipus complex was beyond me.

Reading it in detail for my psych test, was shocking to say the least and slightly humorous.

😆 it shocked and amused me greatly! To think that this man sat down and came to a conclusion that all men have a secret and inner desire for their mother was seriously 'out of the box'

Originally posted by: siinnce.09

@ Kaash, no dear i'm not angry lol i just get fired up when the topic is based on Kripa.

haa i know.....evn those days wen angad was put to jail without any reason at all.....i felt like 😡😡

Originally posted by: CanadianAddict

@Kaasshh: Sorry, I am just saying what I knew of that show...i didnt watch it that often...when i did i was very shocked by Kripa's character.

here kripa and another character wich used to annoy me the most was kashish in kahin to hoga.....u wont biliv she did so so so sooo bad with sujal whuu loved her like heellll....she told him to be a murderer and sent him to jail 😡😡

wow.

Originally posted by: --ania--

wow.

...just read your analysis, Samira. 🤗

Its like I was reviewing for Psych....hehe.

You brought in a lot of different aspects of psychology to analyze his various behaviourisms.

You see there are so many different theories to explain the cause of behaviour/actions....I like some of Freud's theories....Id, Ego, Superego is my favourite one as I think its very justifiable and one can personally sorta relate to it.

Also, I'd mention, there are other personality development theories....like that of Kohlberg, Jean Piaget, and Erikson which nicely fit in to explain if a certain stage has not been taken place properly which may influence the person later in life. For instance, in Krishna's case, the preconventional level of Kohlberg's theory has got to do alot with how Krishna has turned out and how he views morals, society, himself, family etc. and responds to these institiutions according to the way he has "learnt" to behave.

Just to give a brief note on the preconventional level: it basically involves punishment and obedience orientations. The child learns the basis on which right/wrong are punished and the basis on which something is rewarded for. So, since he has always seen SS beating his wife for small things such as less salt/spices in dinner or not getting him some tea. This then became the "norm" for Krishna....he saw that this is how women are supposed to be treated.....ie. if they dont provide you good food, don't obey you, then you're supposed to raise your hand and whip them. Now, as a child, he might have been scolded for crying if he got emotional from his brother or father and that behaviour would've been labelled as being "sissy". But, if he didn't cry for e.g. if he sees his mom getting hurt and acts like a "man", then he'd be praised by his dad...so, being rewarded for such behaviour would set up the guidelines for him that "being manly gets you the reward and women aren't a thing to pity on".

Anyways, that was just an example that how the development of this pre conventional stage must have been responsible for what he thinks is right or wrong now and where his morals lie.

Now, you mentioned the different forms of agression, well that was something new for me...but pretty much a self explanatory and easy concept....makes sense. :P

Samira, thanks for such a lovely post 👏👏👏....am sure we all learned a thing or two from your thread. =) ⭐️

u hve hit on a vry good point ania

Originally posted by: kaasshh

hve hit on a vry good point ania👏

and by the way ur new avatar is wonderful😳 sonam kapoor...js love her😳