If - Page 4

if Jagya would have not become either grey or negative when they became mature, but instead A would have become grey and she would have started affair with shiv .

but then shiv would have become negative and left A again so A is back to bilaria and then she comes in contact with Gauri and Sanchi all 3 start then gossip girls show altogether 😎

Originally posted by: leavesandwaves

<font color="#CC00FF">I said If ganga was saved by shiv and shiv got attached to ganga, Not fallen for her. shalini173.

Shiv could have been Jaitsar collector and he could have saved ganga there. Both Jagya and shiv could have done lots of help by warding off Rattan.

Shiv could have a very platonic relationship with anandi. And he could have encouraged her to become a Collector.

Shiv could have helped ganga to start an NGO.

And a young Maahi could have fallen for ganga and Shiv could have encouraged it with Ira not being so stupid as of now.

</font>

I think u r offended by my comment. (Sorry for the way I expressed) Ok no Ganga-shiv. (Sorry for the misunderstanding.) I thought there's no need of Shiv and Ganga if they are not involved with the main characters (Anandhi -Jagya ) coz this story is about Jagya-Anandhi.

Now I got ur answer. So shiv and Ganga will be playing side characters like Maahi, Lal, ashima etc. Right?

Originally posted by: shalinii173

I think u r offended by my comment. (Sorry for the way I expressed) Ok no Ganga-shiv. (Sorry for the misunderstanding.) I thought there's no need of Shiv and Ganga if they are not involved with the main characters (Anandhi -Jagya ) coz this story is about Jagya-Anandhi.

Now I got ur answer. So shiv and Ganga will be playing side characters like Maahi, Lal, ashima etc. Right?

I am not offended. I tried to connect the dots.

Instead of sanchi, they should have developed mahi track, his equation with his mother.
The mother and son dont have any heartwarming moments.

Originally posted by: charuluv_SV

why my sister,i tell u if i meet a person like Jagya and if he proves he completely changed and reformed then i will go ahead with marry him but not a man who standing like a coward when his mom and sis insults his wife's father and ds.

If I were the writer, I would not have made Jagya a negative character with adultery etc. Bal vivah does not mean that the boy has go ahead with marrying another girl without even divorcing his wife. Gauri could have been shown a positive character but not in a relationship with Jagya, because even Jagya-Gauri had had bal-vivah. Instead I would have preferred Jagya- Gauri as friends and someone else as Jagya's love interest - someone positive. Jagya always had grey shades so, he would have still be selfish and wanted to marry the other girl, but he would not have been nasty with Anandi. He would have married his love interest after proper divorce with Anandi - naturally the family would have protested and here Jagya and his wife would have convinced them that he is not compatible with Anandi that he loves his new wife and whatever happened to Anandi is due to bal vivah only.

Originally posted by: SPuja

If I were the writer, I would not have made Jagya a negative character with adultery etc. Bal vivah does not mean that the boy has go ahead with marrying another girl without even divorcing his wife. Gauri could have been shown a positive character but not in a relationship with Jagya, because even Jagya-Gauri had had bal-vivah. Instead I would have preferred Jagya- Gauri as friends and someone else as Jagya's love interest - someone positive. Jagya always had grey shades so, he would have still be selfish and wanted to marry the other girl, but he would not have been nasty with Anandi. He would have married his love interest after proper divorce with Anandi - naturally the family would have protested and here Jagya and his wife would have convinced them that he is not compatible with Anandi that he loves his new wife and whatever happened to Anandi is due to bal vivah only.

Anandi would have returned to her parents with no hard feelings for Singhs/Jagya/his wife and would have started her studies and career - becoming an independent career woman- may be a teacher as she always admired her teacherjee. In due course she may meet with Shiv and marry him - a simple nice love story. Anandi would spread awareness against bal-vivah and also other social evils.

Personally, I do not think that negative characters are necessary to take the story forward, I like the stories where the circumstances become obstacles rather than evil persons like Sanchi. Creatives think the opposite.

Originally posted by: SPuja

If I were the writer, I would not have made Jagya a negative character with adultery etc. Bal vivah does not mean that the boy has go ahead with marrying another girl without even divorcing his wife. Gauri could have been shown a positive character but not in a relationship with Jagya, because even Jagya-Gauri had had bal-vivah. Instead I would have preferred Jagya- Gauri as friends and someone else as Jagya's love interest - someone positive. Jagya always had grey shades so, he would have still be selfish and wanted to marry the other girl, but he would not have been nasty with Anandi. He would have married his love interest after proper divorce with Anandi - naturally the family would have protested and here Jagya and his wife would have convinced them that he is not compatible with Anandi that he loves his new wife and whatever happened to Anandi is due to bal vivah only.

Anandi would have returned to her parents with no hard feelings for Singhs/Jagya/his wife and would have started her studies and career - becoming an independent career woman- may be a teacher as she always admired her teacherjee. In due course she may meet with Shiv and marry him - a simple nice love story. Anandi would spread awareness against bal-vivah and also other social evils.

Personally, I do not think that negative characters are necessary to take the story forward, I like the stories where the circumstances become obstacles rather than evil persons like Sanchi. Creatives think the opposite.

Not a bad idea.

Originally posted by: SPuja

If I were the writer, I would not have made Jagya a negative character with adultery etc. Bal vivah does not mean that the boy has go ahead with marrying another girl without even divorcing his wife. Gauri could have been shown a positive character but not in a relationship with Jagya, because even Jagya-Gauri had had bal-vivah. Instead I would have preferred Jagya- Gauri as friends and someone else as Jagya's love interest - someone positive. Jagya always had grey shades so, he would have still be selfish and wanted to marry the other girl, but he would not have been nasty with Anandi. He would have married his love interest after proper divorce with Anandi - naturally the family would have protested and here Jagya and his wife would have convinced them that he is not compatible with Anandi that he loves his new wife and whatever happened to Anandi is due to bal vivah only.

Anandi would have returned to her parents with no hard feelings for Singhs/Jagya/his wife and would have started her studies and career - becoming an independent career woman- may be a teacher as she always admired her teacherjee. In due course she may meet with Shiv and marry him - a simple nice love story. Anandi would spread awareness against bal-vivah and also other social evils.

Personally, I do not think that negative characters are necessary to take the story forward, I like the stories where the circumstances become obstacles rather than evil persons like Sanchi. Creatives think the opposite.