Anandis testimony - Page 2

Originally posted by: PRB_Shonit

I was mad at Shiv for stating facts selectively..

And with Anandi's reply to Shiv while depicting Jagya's truth in the court, it was a BANG ON reply to her egoistic husband 🥳 I have no more problems with Shiv's answers now.. Anandi has given him back ..

However, Anandi's clean chit to Jagya's character was a bit surprising.. But as I am favoring Jagya in this case pretty badly, I am happy with such blatant answer of Anandi which leaves no scope for prosecution to grill her 🥳

Way to go Anandi.. Jagya is a changed man now, and he totally deserves such character certificate from people 🥳

Originally posted by: charuluv_SV

well done Anandi👍🏼

i start to like u for the first time😃

@groucho..i do agree with most of your points.

but whether anandi was absolutely SPOT ON & correct is debatable, she said "jaanboojh kar kabhi kisi aurat ko dukh ya takleef nahin de sakte jagdish"

@bold .. is that true ? she was not referring to just the present but the past too .she has not only answered the lawyer's question but also much more than that.. in one stroke she proved her husband wrong...his belief that she had suffered a lot at jagya's hands in the past 😕

as i think more n more...i feel she has not been completely truthful but biased towards jagya.

also in the present, except for helping ganga, what other qualities of jagya made her make such strong statements in the court ...what proofs does she have to validate her statements ?

Originally posted by: BeyondTheSky

@groucho..i do agree with most of your points.

but whether anandi was absolutely SPOT ON & correct is debatable, she said "jaanboojh kar kabhi kisi aurat ko dukh ya takleef nahin de sakte jagdish"

@bold .. is that true ? she was not referring to just the present but the past too .she has not only answered the lawyer's question but also much more than that.. in one stroke she proved her husband wrong...his belief that she had suffered a lot at jagya's hands in the past 😕

as i think more n more...i feel she has not been completely truthful but biased towards jagya.

also in the present, except for helping ganga, what other qualities of jagya made her make such strong statements in the court ...what proofs does she have to validate her statements ?

He never set out to hurt her deliberately.

Originally posted by: BeyondTheSky

@groucho..i do agree with most of your points.

but whether anandi was absolutely SPOT ON & correct is debatable, she said "jaanboojh kar kabhi kisi aurat ko dukh ya takleef nahin de sakte jagdish"

@bold .. is that true ? she was not referring to just the present but the past too .she has not only answered the lawyer's question but also much more than that.. in one stroke she proved her husband wrong...his belief that she had suffered a lot at jagya's hands in the past 😕

as i think more n more...i feel she has not been completely truthful but biased towards jagya.

also in the present, except for helping ganga, what other qualities of jagya made her make such strong statements in the court ...what proofs does she have to validate her statements ?

^ I agree with Aparnauma..

Originally posted by: groucho

Sure I expected differing opinions...that is what makes this Forum interesting.

She was asked in the present scenario...she answered in the present. It could be construed either way...so I guess we are looking at it differently.

Yes Jagya hurt her in the past...wasn't the whole point of BV to show the effects of child marriage?? That is a whole new debate.

Did she tell Shiv she had suffered at the hands of Jagya??? I seem to recall her telling Bhairon not to blame Jagya...because he was as helpless as she was... of course she went through hell but there were more factors than just Jagya.

As for what Jagya has done...do you really think what has been shown is only Ganga and nothing else???

I accept your view even if it differs from mine 😊...as you said correctly...we are in agreement with most 😉😊

thanks @groucho 😊
i don't think she needed to tell this to shiv in words...he just understood .
yes, lets agree with the disagreement 😊
may be i am jumping the gun here...need to watch today''s episode first to get complete picture.

Originally posted by: groucho

Sure I expected differing opinions...that is what makes this Forum interesting.

She was asked in the present scenario...she answered in the present. It could be construed either way...so I guess we are looking at it differently.

Yes Jagya hurt her in the past...wasn't the whole point of BV to show the effects of child marriage?? That is a whole new debate.

Did she tell Shiv she had suffered at the hands of Jagya??? I seem to recall her telling Bhairon not to blame Jagya...because he was as helpless as she was... of course she went through hell but there were more factors than just Jagya.

As for what Jagya has done...do you really think what has been shown is only Ganga and nothing else???

I accept your view even if it differs from mine 😊...as you said correctly...we are in agreement with most 😉😊

I agree 100% with you TM! 😊

What Anandi did was correct and adequate.

Rest is duty of PP.

And if lawyers, police and Shiv could dig up other stuff from past then they could dig up stuff here too, put them in front of court or questioned Jagya or Anandi about them!

On her part, Anandi was right.

I am glad she stood by truth.

Hmm...agree he dint the job too good, it could have been better