Cv's and politics - Page 4

I think timing is super wrong. There is nothing wrong if Anandi feels she is nothing without Shiv. That should be taken as their depth of love. But I agree she used that feeling for justifying Shiv and Ira behavior rather fixing the issue. I would have been happy if she thought of talking to Shiv and clear the misunderstandings right after that dialog rather sulking alone.

Originally posted by: hooked

No matter how they spin it, feeling sympathy for A is just not happening for me. Then whether she justifies herself to Kanhaji or thinks of her mom. Your first loyalty shud always be to your roots.
S was insulting n rude n malicious n derogatory n A shud hv felt very insulted. The fact that she refused to believe she heard that crap n still urged J to accept her n all her lies as proof of her love - have made me feel A has either no loyalty or no brains or no courage.

@hooked@picasso,wonderfully put it⭐️😃

Originally posted by: rightchoice

I think timing is super wrong. There is nothing wrong if Anandi feels she is nothing without Shiv. That should be taken as their depth of love. But I agree she used that feeling for justifying Shiv and Ira behavior rather fixing the issue. I would have been happy if she thought of talking to Shiv and clear the misunderstandings right after that dialog rather sulking alone.

Yesterday, Jagya also used something similar 'Tum ho to main hun!'.

I guess with such dialog alone do not constitute regressive but context is important.

Well if she had told this to Shiv then still we'd have thought it was for love. But she was using it justify their behaviour towards her. That is wrong and being a doormat.

Jagya has said it to Ganga.

But I never saw Shiv saying such extreme worded stuff to Anandi.

Saying, "I don't know what I'd have done without you" is not the same as "I am nothing without you".

Anandi has saved Shiv's life once apart from other things. Still he has not shown this passion for her or shown he can't live without her.

Seeing his behaviour now it seems that in past whenever he defended Anandi he was defending his choice, salvaging his own ego ("you can't attack my choice!") than defending her.

The moment ship reached troubled waters he abandoned it?

Anandi has been at fault often for being silent or not talking openly and frankly with him. But he never realised even once how difficult it was for her and how she had warned him despite her contraints.

Originally posted by: Picasso9

In today's episode the cvs cleverly tried to pacify Ansh fans with Anandi's monologue explaining her state of mind and why she does not blame Shiv and why Shiv is not to blame (patriarchal thinking anyone?). And basically answered some of the questions we critics had, though not adequately in my book.

It was quite a contrived scene inserting little Anandi and Bhago to tug at heart strings.

totaly agree I felt the same while Anandi's scenes.

ZenerDiode: The mood of the moment was anger, overwhelming anger towards Jagya. In that situation, anything Jagya did was wrong to Shiv. That's why he stopped Jagya from holding Sanchi's hand. "Mood" is the base word here.